YouTube 视频中自闭症谱系障碍描绘的横断面描述性分析:简短报告。
A cross-sectional descriptive analysis of portrayal of autism spectrum disorders in YouTube videos: A short report.
机构信息
Lamar University, USA.
Manipal University, India.
出版信息
Autism. 2020 Jan;24(1):263-268. doi: 10.1177/1362361319864222. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
Professionals have expressed concerns about the quality of autism-related information available from Internet-based sources. The purpose of this study was to examine the source, content, usability, and actionability of autism spectrum disorder-related information contained in 100 different videos directed to families of children with autism spectrum disorder uploaded to YouTube. Upload sources were identified, and video content was coded. Understandability and actionability of the videos were examined using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials. The collective number of views of the videos was almost 100 million. The length of videos was 691.17 min (i.e. 11.5 h) with the shortest video being 30 s and the longest video being 37.36 min. The YouTube videos related to autism spectrum disorder covered a range of issues, although much of the content was focused on signs and symptoms. No difference in content reporting was noted based on sources for most categories, although differences were noted in some categories (e.g. professionals mentioned diagnosis and resources more frequently). Poor understandability and actionability scores (i.e. below 70%) were reported for all videos regardless of video source. However, the videos generated by the professionals were superior in terms of understandability. Study implications and recommendations for further research are discussed.
专业人士对互联网上提供的自闭症相关信息的质量表示担忧。本研究旨在检查在 YouTube 上上传的 100 个不同的自闭症谱系障碍相关视频中,自闭症谱系障碍相关信息的来源、内容、可用性和可操作性。确定了上传来源,并对视频内容进行了编码。使用视听材料患者教育材料评估工具检查了视频的可理解性和可操作性。这些视频的总浏览量接近 10 亿次。视频的长度为 691.17 分钟(即 11.5 小时),最短的视频为 30 秒,最长的视频为 37.36 分钟。与自闭症谱系障碍相关的 YouTube 视频涵盖了一系列问题,尽管大部分内容都集中在症状和体征上。尽管在某些类别(例如,专业人员更频繁地提到诊断和资源)中存在差异,但基于大多数类别,来源并未发现内容报告存在差异。无论视频来源如何,所有视频的可理解性和可操作性得分(即低于 70%)均较差。然而,专业人员制作的视频在可理解性方面更胜一筹。讨论了研究意义和进一步研究的建议。