• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圆锥角膜检测与严重程度评分的逻辑指数(Logik)。

Logistic index for keratoconus detection and severity scoring (Logik).

作者信息

Issarti Ikram, Consejo Alejandra, Jiménez-García Marta, Kreps Elke O, Koppen Carina, Rozema Jos J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium; Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103809. Epub 2020 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103809
PMID:32658727
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop an objective severity scoring system for keratoconus for the use in clinical practice.

METHODS

Corneal elevation and minimum thickness data of 812 subjects were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups: one control group with normal topography in both eyes (304 eyes), and one keratoconus group (508 eyes). Keratoconus cases ranged from suspect to moderate and had at least 1 examination in 1 of 2 recruiting centres. The elevation data were fitted to Zernike polynomial functions up to 8th order. An adapted machine learning algorithm was then applied to derive a platform-independent severity scoring and identification system for keratoconus.

RESULTS

The resulting logistic index for keratoconus (Logik) provided consistent and progressing scoring that reflected keratoconus severity. Moreover, the system provided an accurate classification of suspect keratoconus versus normal (sensitivity of 85.2%, specificity of 70.0%) when compared with Belin/Ambrosio Display Deviation (BAD_D) (sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 74.4%) and the Pentacam Topographical Keratoconus Classification (TKC) (sensitivity of 9.3%, specificity of 97.0%). Logik also showed better accuracy for grading keratoconus stages with an average accuracy of 99.9% versus (98.2%, 94.7%) with BAD_D and TKC respectively.

CONCLUSION

Logik is a reliable index to identify suspect keratoconus and to score the severity of the disease. It shows an agreement with existing approaches while achieving better performance.

摘要

目的

开发一种用于圆锥角膜的客观严重程度评分系统,以供临床实践使用。

方法

回顾性收集812名受试者的角膜高度和最小厚度数据,并将其分为两组:一组为双眼地形图正常的对照组(304只眼),另一组为圆锥角膜组(508只眼)。圆锥角膜病例范围从疑似到中度,且至少在两个招募中心之一进行过1次检查。将高度数据拟合到八阶泽尼克多项式函数。然后应用一种改进的机器学习算法来推导一个与平台无关的圆锥角膜严重程度评分和识别系统。

结果

所得的圆锥角膜逻辑指数(Logik)提供了一致且渐进的评分,反映了圆锥角膜的严重程度。此外,与贝林/安布罗西显示偏差(BAD_D)(灵敏度75.0%,特异性74.4%)和Pentacam地形图圆锥角膜分类(TKC)(灵敏度9.3%,特异性97.0%)相比,该系统对疑似圆锥角膜与正常情况提供了准确的分类(灵敏度85.2%,特异性70.0%)。Logik在圆锥角膜分期分级方面也显示出更高的准确性,平均准确率为99.9%,而BAD_D和TKC分别为98.2%、94.7%。

结论

Logik是识别疑似圆锥角膜和对疾病严重程度进行评分的可靠指标。它与现有方法一致,同时表现更优。

相似文献

1
Logistic index for keratoconus detection and severity scoring (Logik).圆锥角膜检测与严重程度评分的逻辑指数(Logik)。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103809. Epub 2020 May 16.
2
Computer aided diagnosis for suspect keratoconus detection.计算机辅助诊断可疑圆锥角膜。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jun;109:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
[Analysis on the role of Sirius combined topography and tomography system in screening for suspect keratoconus].[Sirius综合地形和断层扫描系统在圆锥角膜疑似病例筛查中的作用分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 11;54(1):33-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.01.007.
4
Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages.比较分析不同阶段正常角膜和圆锥角膜的形态和生物力学特性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;41(11):3699-3711. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01929-4. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
5
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning Classifiers for Early Detection of Keratoconus.基于人工智能的机器学习分类器在圆锥角膜早期检测中的比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;32(3):1352-1360. doi: 10.1177/11206721211073442. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
[Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].基于Corvis® ST参数的圆锥角膜检测与分类:一项基于机器学习算法的研究
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul;118(7):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01231-1. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Asymmetry between Left and Right Eyes in Keratoconus Patients Increases with the Severity of the Worse Eye.圆锥角膜患者左右眼的不对称性随较差眼病情严重程度的增加而增大。
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):848-855. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1451545. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.在诊断非对称性圆锥角膜患者对侧眼的亚临床圆锥角膜时,多指标D指数与角膜曲率、角膜厚度及后表面高度参数的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.052. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
[Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].[圆锥角膜患者父母的角膜地形图特征]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 11;56(6):456-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20191008-00200.
10
Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection.分析门诊扫描和 Pentacam 参数,以早期发现圆锥角膜。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;226:235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Corneal Diseases.人工智能在角膜疾病中的临床应用
Vision (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;9(3):71. doi: 10.3390/vision9030071.
2
A Method for Visualizing Corneal Dynamics Through Pixel Intensity Tracking.一种通过像素强度跟踪可视化角膜动态的方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 2;14(6):24. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.24.
3
Advances in machine learning for keratoconus diagnosis.圆锥角膜诊断中机器学习的进展。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 30;45(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03496-4.
4
A Comprehensive Survey on Emerging Assistive Technologies for Visually Impaired Persons: Lighting the Path with Visible Light Communications and Artificial Intelligence Innovations.新兴助视技术综述:可见光通信与人工智能创新照亮视障人士前行之路。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;24(15):4834. doi: 10.3390/s24154834.
5
Utility of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: a systematic review.人工智能在圆锥角膜诊断与管理中的应用:一项系统评价
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024 May 17;4:1380701. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1380701. eCollection 2024.
6
Smart decision support system for keratoconus severity staging using corneal curvature and thinnest pachymetry indices.基于角膜曲率和最薄角膜厚度指数的圆锥角膜严重程度分期智能决策支持系统
Eye Vis (Lond). 2024 Jul 8;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40662-024-00394-1.
7
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.人工智能在圆锥角膜检测中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
8
Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review.圆锥角膜的诊断:从基础到人工智能:一项系统性叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;13(16):2715. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162715.
9
Comparison of different corneal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence for diagnosis of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于人工智能的不同角膜成像方式在圆锥角膜诊断中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr;262(4):1017-1039. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06154-6. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
10
Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习辅助检测圆锥角膜的准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 18;11(3):478. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030478.