• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公路铁路平交道口碰撞严重程度分析:随机生存森林法。

A crash severity analysis at highway-rail grade crossings: The random survival forest method.

机构信息

Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Dept. 2880, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.

Department of Transportation, Logistics, and Finance, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105683. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105683. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105683
PMID:32659490
Abstract

This paper proposes a machine learning approach, the random survival forest (RSF) for competing risks, to investigate highway-rail grade crossing (HRGC) crash severity during a 29-year analysis period. The benefits of the RSF approach are that it (1) is a special type of survival analysis able to accommodate the competing nature of multiple-event outcomes to the same event of interest (here the competing multiple events are crash severities), (2) is able to conduct an event-specific selection of risk factors, (3) has the capability to determine long-term cumulative effects of contributors with the cumulative incidence function (CIF), (4) provides high prediction performance, and (5) is effective in high-dimensional settings. The RSF approach is able to consider complexities in HRGC safety analysis, e.g., non-linear relationships between HRGCs crash severities and the contributing factors and heterogeneity in data. Variable importance (VIMP) technique is adopted in this research for selecting the most predictive contributors for each crash-severity level. Moreover, marginal effect analysis results real several HRGC countermeasures' effectiveness. Several insightful findings are discovered. For examples, adding stop signs to HRGCs that already have a combination of gate, standard flashing lights, and audible devices will reduce the likelihood of property damage only (PDO) crashes for up to seven years; but after the seventh year, the crossings are more likely to have PDO crashes. Adding audible devices to crossing with gates and standard flashing lights will reduce crash likelihood, PDO, injury, and fatal crashes by 49 %, 52 %, 46 %, and 50 %, respectively.

摘要

本文提出了一种机器学习方法,即随机生存森林(RSF),用于研究 29 年分析期间公路铁路交叉口(HRGC)碰撞严重程度的竞争风险。RSF 方法的优点在于:(1) 它是一种特殊类型的生存分析方法,能够适应同一感兴趣事件(这里的竞争多事件是碰撞严重程度)的多个事件结果的竞争性质;(2) 能够对风险因素进行特定事件的选择;(3) 具有通过累积发生率函数(CIF)确定贡献者长期累积效应的能力;(4) 提供高预测性能;(5) 在高维环境中有效。RSF 方法能够考虑 HRGC 安全分析的复杂性,例如 HRGC 碰撞严重程度与贡献因素之间的非线性关系以及数据的异质性。本研究采用变量重要性(VIMP)技术来选择每个碰撞严重程度水平最具预测性的贡献因素。此外,边际效应分析结果真实反映了几种 HRGC 对策的有效性。发现了一些有见地的发现。例如,在已经有门、标准闪光灯和声音装置的 HRGC 上添加停车标志,将降低财产损失(PDO)碰撞的可能性,最长可达七年;但在第七年之后,这些交叉口更有可能发生 PDO 碰撞。在带有门和标准闪光灯的交叉路口添加声音设备,将分别降低碰撞可能性、PDO、伤害和致命碰撞的可能性 49%、52%、46%和 50%。

相似文献

1
A crash severity analysis at highway-rail grade crossings: The random survival forest method.公路铁路平交道口碰撞严重程度分析:随机生存森林法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105683. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105683. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Investigating the effectiveness of safety countermeasures at highway-rail at-grade crossings using a competing risk model.利用竞争风险模型研究公路-铁路平交道口安全措施的有效性。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Geometric effect analysis of highway-rail grade crossing safety performance.公路铁路平交道口安全性能的几何效应分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105470. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105470. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
4
Contributing factors of crash injury severity at public highway-railroad grade crossings in the U.S.美国公共公路-铁路平交道口碰撞伤害严重程度的影响因素
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
5
What are the differences in driver injury outcomes at highway-rail grade crossings? Untangling the role of pre-crash behaviors.在公路与铁路平交道口,驾驶员受伤结果有哪些差异?厘清碰撞前行为的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Dec;85:157-69. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
A comparative study of rail-pedestrian trespassing crash injury severity between highway-rail grade crossings and non-crossings.铁路-行人闯入碰撞伤害严重程度的公路-铁路平交道口与非平交道口比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:427-438. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
Driver injury severity related to inclement weather at highway-rail grade crossings in the United States.美国公路-铁路平交道口恶劣天气与驾驶员受伤严重程度的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1034274. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Using hierarchical tree-based regression model to predict train-vehicle crashes at passive highway-rail grade crossings.使用基于层次树的回归模型预测被动式公铁平交道口的列车-车辆碰撞事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
Accident prediction model for public highway-rail grade crossings.公共公路-铁路平交道口事故预测模型
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 May;90:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
10
Applying machine learning, text mining, and spatial analysis techniques to develop a highway-railroad grade crossing consolidation model.应用机器学习、文本挖掘和空间分析技术开发公路-铁路平交道口整合模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105985. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105985. Epub 2021 Jan 22.