Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan, China; Department of Surgery, Baltimore, MD; The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Surgery, Baltimore, MD; Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Nov;231(5):527-535.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
The frequency and significance of the germline variants in DNA damage repair genes still need to be elucidated in patients with sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Our purpose was to determine whether germline variants in DNA damage repair genes were associated with survival of patients with sporadic PDAC.
We retrospectively identified 854 patients with sporadic PDAC with germline DNA sequenced in targeted 22 DNA damage repair genes by next-generation sequencing. Outcomes were compared in terms of clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
Nineteen patients had deleterious mutations; 103 had variant(s) of unknown significance (VUS). Germline DNA damage repair deleterious variant carriers had superior DFS (median, 19.1 months vs 11.9 months, p = 0.012) and OS (median, 29.7 months vs 20.2 months, p = 0.034), as compared with wild-type patients. Germline DNA damage repair VUS variant carriers also had superior DFS when compared with wild-type patients. In subgroup analysis, this improved survival was limited to patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, deleterious variant carriers vs wild-type patients DFS (median 36.3 months vs 13.1 months, p = 0.006) and OS (median 43.7 months vs 24.3 months, p = 0.045), VUS variant carriers vs wild-type patients DFS (16.5 months vs 13.1 months, p = 0.007).
Having a deleterious variant in a DNA damage repair gene is associated with improved survival after resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
在散发性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中,仍需要阐明 DNA 损伤修复基因的种系变异的频率和意义。我们的目的是确定 DNA 损伤修复基因中的种系变异是否与散发性 PDAC 患者的生存相关。
我们回顾性地鉴定了 854 名接受过下一代测序靶向 22 个 DNA 损伤修复基因的种系 DNA 测序的散发性 PDAC 患者。根据临床病理特征、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)比较结局。
19 名患者存在有害突变;103 名患者存在意义不明的变异(VUS)。种系 DNA 损伤修复有害变异携带者的 DFS(中位,19.1 个月比 11.9 个月,p=0.012)和 OS(中位,29.7 个月比 20.2 个月,p=0.034)均优于野生型患者。与野生型患者相比,种系 DNA 损伤修复 VUS 变异携带者的 DFS 也更好。在亚组分析中,这种生存改善仅限于接受辅助化疗的患者,有害变异携带者与野生型患者的 DFS(中位,36.3 个月比 13.1 个月,p=0.006)和 OS(中位,43.7 个月比 24.3 个月,p=0.045),VUS 变异携带者与野生型患者的 DFS(16.5 个月比 13.1 个月,p=0.007)。
在 DNA 损伤修复基因中存在有害变异与胰腺导管腺癌切除术后和辅助化疗后的生存改善相关。