• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术与合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的对比研究

A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Sharma J B, Deoghare Manasi Kamalakar, Bhatla Neerja, Kachhawa Garima, Mahey Reeta, Kumari Rajesh, Seth Amlesh, Sharma Alpana

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062
PMID:32659641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare short term results of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery with synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) STUDY DESIGN: It was a comparative study on 30 women between 25-65 years of age with urodynamic proven SUI who were randomly allocated to autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery (Group I)(15 women) and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure (Group II) (15 women). Preoperative and postoperative ICIQ (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire) score, urodynamic study and serum CRP and IL-6 were done in all cases.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), parity, mean ICIQ score and mean preoperative CRP and IL-6 levels were similar in two groups. Mean operative time was significantly longer (55.60 ± 5.77 vs 25.27 ± 4.32 minutes, p = 0.001) in group I than group II. Mean hospital stay of 7.1 ± 1.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.4 days, mean duration of catheterization 5.8 vs 1.2 day (<0.01) and postoperative urinary retention requiring recathterization were all significantly higher in group I than II. Wound infection was more in group I than in group II (p = 0.01) while groin pain was significantly more in group II (p = 0.01). One patient developed vesicovaginal fistula, while one patient required cutting of tape in group I. Pdet at Q max (Detrusor pressure at peak urine flow) increased significantly in both the groups after surgery. ICIQ score was zero in both the groups indicating 100 % success. Surgical trauma was more in group I as shown by significantly higher CRP levels.

CONCLUSION

The success rate of the two groups was similar but, autologous rectus fascia sling surgery took longer, had more complications and urinary retention as compared to transobturator vaginal tape procedure.

摘要

目的

比较自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术与合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的短期疗效。

研究设计

这是一项针对30名年龄在25至65岁之间、经尿动力学证实为SUI的女性的比较研究,她们被随机分为自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术组(I组,15名女性)和合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术组(II组,15名女性)。所有病例均进行术前和术后ICIQ(国际尿失禁咨询问卷)评分、尿动力学研究以及血清CRP和IL-6检测。

结果

两组在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、产次、平均ICIQ评分以及术前平均CRP和IL-6水平等基线特征方面相似。I组的平均手术时间显著长于II组(55.60 ± 5.77分钟对25.27 ± 4.32分钟,p = 0.001)。I组的平均住院时间为7.1 ± 1.2天,而II组为1.2 ± 0.4天;I组的平均导尿持续时间为5.8天,而II组为1.2天(<0.01),且I组术后需要再次导尿的尿潴留发生率均显著高于II组。I组的伤口感染情况比II组更严重(p = 0.01),而II组的腹股沟疼痛明显更严重(p = 0.01)。I组有1例患者发生膀胱阴道瘘,1例患者需要剪断吊带。两组术后最大尿流率时的逼尿肌压力(Pdet at Q max)均显著升高。两组的ICIQ评分均为零,表明成功率为100%。如CRP水平显著升高所示,I组的手术创伤更大。

结论

两组的成功率相似,但与经闭孔阴道吊带术相比,自体腹直肌筋膜吊带术耗时更长,并发症更多,尿潴留发生率更高。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence.自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术与合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的对比研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
2
Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up.无张力阴道吊带术与自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的中期随访
Med Princ Pract. 2008;17(3):209-14. doi: 10.1159/000117794. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
3
Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence.采用自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的临床及尿动力学结果
Int J Urol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1076-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01909.x.
4
Comparison of video urodynamic results after the pubovaginal sling procedure using rectus fascia and polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence.使用腹直肌筋膜和聚丙烯网片行耻骨后阴道悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁后的视频尿动力学结果比较
J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):163-8. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00039.
5
Comparative analysis of urinary incontinence severity after autologous fascia pubovaginal sling, pubovaginal sling and tension-free vaginal tape.自体筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术、耻骨后阴道吊带术及无张力阴道吊带术后尿失禁严重程度的比较分析
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):604-8; discussion 608-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.062.
6
Autologous versus synthetic slings in female stress urinary incontinence: A retrospective study.女性压力性尿失禁中自体吊带与合成吊带的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Arab J Urol. 2018 Jul 9;16(4):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.05.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Transobturator tape and mini-sling methods in stress urinary incontinence: Results of a randomized clinical trial.经闭孔尿道中段无张力吊带术与迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁:一项随机临床试验的结果
Urologia. 2019 Aug;86(3):152-155. doi: 10.1177/0391560319845255. Epub 2019 May 10.
8
Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up.用于治疗压力性尿失禁的迷你吊带(奥菲拉)与耻骨后阴道吊带:中期随访
Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):210-8. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2015.60.
9
Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.自体耻骨阴道吊带与合成经闭孔(TOT)SAFYRE吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的对比研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Feb;273(5):288-92. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0083-1. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
10
Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.术前常规尿动力学检查无法预测Burch阴道悬吊术与耻骨后阴道吊带术相比后发生的排尿功能障碍。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2076-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of midurethral tape with autologous rectus fascial sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术与自体腹直肌筋膜悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Curr Urol. 2025 Mar;19(2):95-109. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000225. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Autologous Slings in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.自体吊带在女性压力性尿失禁治疗中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):759-773. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05768-6. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
3
Role of Incontinence Severity Index in Evaluating Severity and Impact of Treatment Of Stress Urinary Incontinence.
尿失禁严重程度指数在评估压力性尿失禁严重程度及治疗效果中的作用
J Midlife Health. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):139-144. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_113_20. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Autologous Fascial Slings for Surgical Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Come Back.用于压力性尿失禁手术治疗的自体筋膜吊带:卷土重来。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Apr;71(2):106-114. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01408-3. Epub 2021 Jan 2.