• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术与自体腹直肌筋膜悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of midurethral tape with autologous rectus fascial sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Güler Yavuz

机构信息

Urology Department, The Private Safa Hospital, T.C. Rumeli University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2025 Mar;19(2):95-109. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000225. Epub 2023 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000225
PMID:40314007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12042186/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the success rates of autologous fascial mesh (sling and transobturator tape [TOT]) with midurethral synthetic meshes (tension-free vaginal tape sling [TVT] and TOT) for stress urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search for studies published in English was conducted from May 10, 2022, to June 1, 2022. The search included MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest, using the terms{"Autologous fascial slings"}OR {"AFS"} AND{"TOT"} OR {"Transobturator tape"} OR{"TVT"} OR{"Transvaginal tape"}. A total of 20 studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials, were selected for the review. RevMan software (version 5.3) was used to calculate the pooled effect estimates for operative and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

In the systemic review, 20 studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials, were assessed. In the TVT versus autologous pubovaginal sling (A-PVS) groups, the effect estimates for the surgical duration, catheter duration, success, and complication rates were more advantageous for TVT. However, in comparison to autologous transobturator tape groups, TOT provided better operative time and a shorter hospital stay. Moreover, in comparison to the A-PVS group, the TOT group was superior in terms of operating time, urethral catheterization, hospital stay, amount of residual urine, and wound complications. The A-PVS group had significantly more groin and thigh pain.

CONCLUSIONS

During medium- and long-term follow-ups, the use of autologous rectus fascia grafts using a A-PVS or TOT provided similar complication rates and urinary continence results as using midurethral synthetic meshes (TVT and TOT).

摘要

目的

比较自体筋膜网片(吊带和经闭孔带 [TOT])与中尿道合成网片(无张力阴道吊带 [TVT] 和 TOT)治疗压力性尿失禁的成功率。

材料与方法

于2022年5月10日至2022年6月1日对以英文发表的研究进行文献检索。检索范围包括MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网、谷歌学术和ProQuest,检索词为{"自体筋膜吊带"}或{"AFS"}以及{"TOT"}或{"经闭孔带"}或{"TVT"}或{"经阴道吊带"}。共筛选出20项研究,其中包括10项随机对照试验用于本综述。使用RevMan软件(5.3版)计算手术和术后变量的合并效应估计值。

结果

在系统评价中,评估了20项研究,包括10项随机对照试验。在TVT与自体耻骨后阴道吊带(A-PVS)组中,TVT在手术时间、导尿管留置时间、成功率和并发症发生率方面的效应估计更具优势。然而,与自体经闭孔带组相比,TOT的手术时间更短,住院时间更短。此外,与A-PVS组相比,TOT组在手术时间、尿道插管、住院时间、残余尿量和伤口并发症方面更具优势。A-PVS组的腹股沟和大腿疼痛明显更多。

结论

在中长期随访中,使用A-PVS或TOT的自体腹直肌筋膜移植与使用中尿道合成网片(TVT和TOT)的并发症发生率和尿失禁结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/2e1795b9687e/curr-urol-19-095-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/8e42a0ca986c/curr-urol-19-095-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/a9a46408edec/curr-urol-19-095-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/1927c0d16b46/curr-urol-19-095-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/d8b99a839d43/curr-urol-19-095-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/0b66372e2767/curr-urol-19-095-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9c6f4cd82ca8/curr-urol-19-095-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/604a80583491/curr-urol-19-095-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/d19ece16f75c/curr-urol-19-095-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/0a367394c64a/curr-urol-19-095-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/dc0ec0fb2764/curr-urol-19-095-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/4897491a7f10/curr-urol-19-095-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/2390edb9102e/curr-urol-19-095-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9aa0da971b8a/curr-urol-19-095-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/cbd5e1d0f7d8/curr-urol-19-095-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/62fabcbd6bf6/curr-urol-19-095-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9dc615e45ccb/curr-urol-19-095-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/25fd1fa08f02/curr-urol-19-095-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/f3d4754fba79/curr-urol-19-095-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/2e1795b9687e/curr-urol-19-095-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/8e42a0ca986c/curr-urol-19-095-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/a9a46408edec/curr-urol-19-095-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/1927c0d16b46/curr-urol-19-095-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/d8b99a839d43/curr-urol-19-095-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/0b66372e2767/curr-urol-19-095-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9c6f4cd82ca8/curr-urol-19-095-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/604a80583491/curr-urol-19-095-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/d19ece16f75c/curr-urol-19-095-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/0a367394c64a/curr-urol-19-095-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/dc0ec0fb2764/curr-urol-19-095-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/4897491a7f10/curr-urol-19-095-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/2390edb9102e/curr-urol-19-095-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9aa0da971b8a/curr-urol-19-095-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/cbd5e1d0f7d8/curr-urol-19-095-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/62fabcbd6bf6/curr-urol-19-095-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/9dc615e45ccb/curr-urol-19-095-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/25fd1fa08f02/curr-urol-19-095-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/f3d4754fba79/curr-urol-19-095-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd4/12042186/2e1795b9687e/curr-urol-19-095-g019.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of midurethral tape with autologous rectus fascial sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术与自体腹直肌筋膜悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Curr Urol. 2025 Mar;19(2):95-109. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000225. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
4
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
5
A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence.自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术与合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的对比研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Meta-analysis of female stress urinary incontinence treatments with adjustable single-incision mini-slings and transobturator tension-free vaginal tape surgeries.可调节单切口迷你吊带术与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2015 Jul 7;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0060-3.
7
Midurethral slings for women with stress urinary incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(3):1-61. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
8
Comparison between tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape in treating stress urinary incontinence after vaginal mesh surgery.无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗阴道网片手术后压力性尿失禁的比较
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;57(4):528-531. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.008.
9
Transobturator hybrid tape versus synthetic tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: A prospective randomized clinical study.经闭孔混合带与合成带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Urologia. 2025 Feb;92(1):154-160. doi: 10.1177/03915603241293838. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
10
Effectiveness and complication rates of tension-free vaginal tape, transobturator tape, and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence in a medium- to long-term follow up. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.无张力阴道吊带术、经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术及无张力阴道吊带-闭孔术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的中长期随访疗效及并发症发生率:随机对照试验的Meta分析
Saudi Med J. 2014 Jan;35(1):20-32.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Autologous Rectus Fascia and Synthetic Sling Methods of Transobturator Mid-Urethral Sling in Urinary Stress Incontinence.经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁中自体腹直肌筋膜与合成吊带方法的比较
Cureus. 2022 Mar 17;14(3):e23278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23278. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Long-term postoperative follow-up results of transobturator autologous rectus fascial sling versus transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes for female stress urinary incontinence: Randomized controlled clinical trial.经闭孔自体腹直肌筋膜吊带与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的术后长期随访结果:随机对照临床试验
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Jan;41(1):281-289. doi: 10.1002/nau.24813. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
Impact of Autologous Transobturator Sling Surgery on Female Sexual Function: A Comparative Study with Mesh Used Mid-Urethral Sling Surgeries.
经阴道闭孔吊带术对女性性功能的影响:与网片用于中段尿道吊带术的比较研究。
Urol Int. 2021;105(9-10):764-770. doi: 10.1159/000514415. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Modified Autologous Transobturator Tape Surgery - A Prospective Comparison With Transobturator Tape Surgery.改良自体经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术——与经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术的前瞻性比较
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence.自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术与合成材料经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的对比研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.062. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
7
Autologous versus synthetic slings in female stress urinary incontinence: A retrospective study.女性压力性尿失禁中自体吊带与合成吊带的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Arab J Urol. 2018 Jul 9;16(4):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.05.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Renaissance of the autologous pubovaginal sling.自体耻骨后阴道吊带术的复兴
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Feb;29(2):177-178. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3521-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery.耻骨后合成材料中尿道吊带与耻骨阴道筋膜吊带在吊带手术失败后的比较。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Sep;35(7):851-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22819. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.