Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020937827. doi: 10.1177/2309499020937827.
Prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved side after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial as it balances increased surgical risks against the possibility of protecting a normal hip from initial slip and deformity. A posterior sloping angle (PSA) of greater than 12-14.5° has been proposed by various authors as a treatment threshold to predict for contralateral hip progression and prophylactic pinning.
A retrospective review of a 10-year series of patients with the diagnosis of SCFE and follow-up of 18 months was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups, those with Isolated Unilateral Slips and those who subsequently underwent Subsequent Contralateral Progression. PSA measurements were performed by two clinicians and assessed for inter-observer reliability. Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, Loder class, endocrinopathy, renal impairment, radiation exposure, and PSA.
There were no significant differences between the distribution of gender, site of slip, age of onset, Loder class, and presence of medical comorbidities between the Isolated Unilateral Slip and Subsequent Contralateral Progression groups ( > 0.05). The mean PSA value was not significantly higher in the Subsequent Contralateral Progression group (17.9 ± 4.32 (10.5-23.5)) compared to the Isolated Unilateral Slip group (15.8 ± 5.31 (6-26)) ( = 0.32). The receiver operator coefficient-derived ideal treatment threshold of 16.5° gave a sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.64, and number needed to treat of 3.
PSA differences between the Subsequent Contralateral Progression and Isolated Unilateral Slip groups were not statistically significant in this series. All proposed treatment thresholds had poor specificity. Prophylactic pinning should not be based on isolated PSA values.
III.
对于单侧股骨颈骨骺滑脱(SCFE)患者,预防性固定对侧未受累侧存在争议,因为它需要权衡增加手术风险与保护正常髋关节免受初始滑脱和畸形的可能性。许多作者提出后倾斜率角(PSA)大于 12-14.5°作为预测对侧髋关节进展和预防性固定的治疗阈值。
对诊断为 SCFE 并随访 18 个月的 10 年系列患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组,一组为单纯单侧滑脱,另一组为随后发生对侧进展。由两位临床医生进行 PSA 测量,并评估观察者间的可靠性。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、种族、Loder 分级、内分泌疾病、肾功能不全、辐射暴露和 PSA。
在单纯单侧滑脱和随后对侧进展组之间,性别、滑脱部位、发病年龄、Loder 分级和合并症的分布无显著差异(>0.05)。随后对侧进展组的平均 PSA 值(17.9 ± 4.32(10.5-23.5))与单纯单侧滑脱组(15.8 ± 5.31(6-26))相比无显著升高(= 0.32)。基于受试者工作特征曲线推导的理想治疗阈值 16.5°的敏感性为 0.71,特异性为 0.64,治疗需要数为 3。
在本研究中,随后对侧进展组和单纯单侧滑脱组之间的 PSA 差异无统计学意义。所有提出的治疗阈值特异性均较差。预防性固定不应基于孤立的 PSA 值。
III。