• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后倾角度在预测对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱中的作用。

The utility of posterior sloping angle in predicting contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Park Sangdo, Hsu Jason E, Rendon Norma, Wolfgruber Hayley, Wells Lawrence

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Oct-Nov;30(7):683-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efb888.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efb888
PMID:20864853
Abstract

PURPOSE

Prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved side after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. The posterior sloping angle (PSA) has previously been proposed to predict contralateral slip. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the PSA can predict subsequent slip after unilateral SCFE, and if so, whether a sex difference exists.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed comparing 51 patients who initially presented with unilateral SCFE and subsequently developed contralateral slip (Bilateral) with 51 patients who had unilateral SCFE only (Unilateral). Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, and PSA.

RESULTS

The patients in the Bilateral group had significantly higher PSA (14.5±6.1 vs. 10.6±5.3, P=0.001) and were younger (11.3±1.5 vs.12.3±1.2, P<0.001) than the patients in the Unilateral group. A receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the threshold for pinning a contralateral hip with PSA >12.66 yields an area under the curve of 67%. When the analysis was repeated with respect to sex, girls in the Bilateral group had significantly higher PSA (15.9±6.3 vs. 10.1±6.0, P=0.002) and were younger (10.7±1.1 vs.11.9±1.0, P<0.001) than the girls in the Unilateral group. Among boys, these associations were not significant. A receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the threshold for pinning a contralateral hip with PSA >13 in girls yields an area under the curve of 76%.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA is predictive of contralateral slip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE. However, it is more predictive in girls, and we recommend considering prophylactic pinning in girls with PSA >13.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

目的

单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)后对未受累侧进行预防性固定存在争议。先前有人提出后倾角度(PSA)可预测对侧滑脱。本研究的目的是确定PSA是否能预测单侧SCFE后的后续滑脱,如果可以,是否存在性别差异。

方法

进行一项回顾性病例对照研究,比较51例最初表现为单侧SCFE且随后发生对侧滑脱(双侧组)的患者与51例仅患有单侧SCFE的患者(单侧组)。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、种族和PSA。

结果

双侧组患者的PSA显著高于单侧组(14.5±6.1对10.6±5.3,P = 0.001),且年龄更小(11.3±1.5对12.3±1.2,P < 0.001)。受试者操作特征曲线表明,PSA>12.66时对侧髋关节固定的阈值产生的曲线下面积为67%。按性别重复分析时,双侧组女孩的PSA显著高于单侧组女孩(15.9±6.3对10.1±6.0,P = 0.002),且年龄更小(10.7±1.1对11.9±1.0,P < 0.001)。在男孩中,这些关联不显著。受试者操作特征曲线表明,女孩中PSA>13时对侧髋关节固定的阈值产生的曲线下面积为76%。

结论

PSA可预测单侧SCFE患者的对侧滑脱。然而,它在女孩中预测性更强,我们建议对PSA>13的女孩考虑进行预防性固定。

证据水平

三级。

相似文献

1
The utility of posterior sloping angle in predicting contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.后倾角度在预测对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱中的作用。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Oct-Nov;30(7):683-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efb888.
2
Posterior sloping angle of the capital femoral physis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis has poor clinical utility and should not guide treatment on prophylactic fixation.在股骨头骨骺滑脱中,股骨头骨骺后倾角度的临床实用性较差,不应用于预防性固定的指导。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020937827. doi: 10.1177/2309499020937827.
3
Bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: predictive factors for contralateral slip.双侧股骨头骨骺滑脱:对侧滑脱的预测因素
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jun;27(4):411-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000271325.33739.86.
4
Posterior sloping angle of the capital femoral physis: interobserver and intraobserver reliability testing and predictor of bilaterality.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Oct-Nov;27(7):801-4. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31814256af.
5
Prediction of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis using the modified Oxford bone age score.使用改良牛津骨龄评分预测对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Apr-May;32(3):290-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182471eb4.
6
Posterior sloping angle of the capital femoral physis: a predictor of bilaterality in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.股骨头骨骺后倾角度:股骨头骨骺滑脱双侧性的预测指标
J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):445-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000158811.29602.a5.
7
Subclinical bilateral involvement of the hip in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.股骨头骨骺滑脱患者髋关节的亚临床双侧受累:一项多中心研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):477-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2131-y. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Posterior sloping angle as a predictor of contralateral slip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.后倾角度预测股骨颈骨骺滑脱对侧滑移。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 16;95(2):146-50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00365.
9
Predicting Risk of Contralateral Slip in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Posterior Epiphyseal Tilt Increases and Superior Epiphyseal Extension Reduces Risk.预测单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱对侧滑移的风险:后骨骺倾斜增加和上骨骺延伸减少风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):209-217. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00440.
10
Chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, and slip severity in patients with subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱患者的软骨溶解、骨坏死及滑脱严重程度
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):485-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01027.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Radiographic Measurements Best Predict Contralateral Slip in Patients Who Undergo Pinning for Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?对于接受单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱固定术的患者,哪些影像学测量方法能最佳预测对侧滑脱?
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 23;12:100204. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100204. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Subsequent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients With Unilateral Slips.预测单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱患者对侧股骨头骨骺随后发生滑脱的机器学习算法的开发与内部验证
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 24;12:100208. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100208. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Morphologic Development of the Posterior Sloping Angle of the Proximal Femoral Epiphysis in Children: What Is the Peak Risk Age for Slipping?
儿童股骨近端骨骺后倾角度的形态学发育:滑脱的最高风险年龄是多少?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Apr 1;45(4):e310-e317. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002875. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
4
Capital Femoral Epiphysis with Acute Unstable Valgus Type Slip Managed with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation: A Case Report.采用闭合复位和经皮固定治疗急性不稳定外翻型股骨头骨骺滑脱:一例报告
Orthop Res Rev. 2023 Nov 4;15:207-213. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S429844. eCollection 2023.
5
Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?考虑到单侧 SCFE 患者对侧髋关节预防性固定,哪种因素更可靠?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jul;29(7):818-823. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038.
6
[Osteonecrosis of the femoral head complicating prophylactic screw fixation for upper femoral epiphyolysis: case report and literature review].[股骨近端骨骺预防性螺钉固定术后并发股骨头坏死:病例报告及文献复习]
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 2;37:112. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.112.23228. eCollection 2020.
7
Epiphyseal Angulation and Related Spatial Orientation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Theoretical Model and Biomechanical Explanation of Varus and Valgus Slip.股骨头骨骺滑脱中的骨骺成角及相关空间定位:内翻和外翻滑脱的理论模型及生物力学解释
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Dec 23;5(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00099. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
8
Probability analysis of sequential SCFE (PASS score).连续性股骨头骨骺滑脱的概率分析(PASS评分)
J Child Orthop. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):387-396. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200080.
9
Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach.预测对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱:一种基于证据的方法。
J Child Orthop. 2020 Apr 1;14(2):91-97. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200012.
10
Alpha Angle as a Predictor of Impending Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in an Asian Population.α角在亚洲人群中对即将发生的对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱的预测作用。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(4):466-473. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.466. Epub 2019 Nov 12.