• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字PCR检测血浆样本中结直肠癌KRAS突变的可靠性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ye Peng, Cai Peiling, Xie Jing, Zhang Jie

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Histology, College of Medicine, Chengdu University.

Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Provincial Fourth People's Hospital.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e21171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021171.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000021171
PMID:32664155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7360253/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensitive methods.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients.

DATA SOURCES

Literature research was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Database searching found 188 relevant studies. After removing duplicates, eligible studies were selected from 151 publications using the following exclusion criteria: STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS:: Data were extracted from the eligible studies by 2 independent researchers. Pooled accuracy parameters were calculated from those extracted data using Meta-DiSc and STATA software.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. After calculation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 7.30 (95%CI: 4.78-11.17), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.15-0.32), and 41.00 (95%CI: 21.07-79.78), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.9322.

LIMITATIONS

Although no significant bias was identified, number of included studies was still quite small, especially in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS

Digital PCR showed high accuracy and could be a reliable detection method for KRAS mutation in plasma samples. Large-cohort prospective study is required to further confirm the usefulness of digital PCR in KRAS mutation detection.

摘要

背景

在对结直肠癌患者给予西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗治疗之前,检测KRAS体细胞突变状态是必要的。转移性结直肠癌患者有时缺乏肿瘤组织样本,而血浆样本中KRAS突变的检测需要高灵敏度的方法。

目的

本研究旨在评估数字PCR检测结直肠癌患者血浆样本中KRAS突变的准确性。

数据来源

在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行文献研究。

研究入选标准、参与者和干预措施:数据库检索发现188项相关研究。去除重复项后,使用以下排除标准从151篇出版物中选择符合条件的研究:研究评估和综合方法:数据由2名独立研究人员从符合条件的研究中提取。使用Meta-DiSc和STATA软件从提取的数据中计算合并准确性参数。

结果

选择12项符合条件的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。计算后,合并灵敏度和特异性分别为0.83(95%CI:0.79 - 0.86)和0.91(95%CI:0.88 - 0.93)。合并阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断比值比分别为7.30(95%CI:4.78 - 11.17)、0.22(95%CI:0.15 - 0.32)和41.00(95%CI:21.07 - 79.78)。汇总ROC曲线下面积为0.9322。

局限性

虽然未发现显著偏倚,但纳入研究的数量仍然相当少,尤其是在亚组分析中。

关键发现的结论和意义

数字PCR显示出高准确性,可能是血浆样本中KRAS突变的可靠检测方法。需要进行大样本队列前瞻性研究以进一步证实数字PCR在KRAS突变检测中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/41866e149514/medi-99-e21171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/98577576e6b1/medi-99-e21171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/dffc38ab778f/medi-99-e21171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/41866e149514/medi-99-e21171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/98577576e6b1/medi-99-e21171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/dffc38ab778f/medi-99-e21171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2c/7360253/41866e149514/medi-99-e21171-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字PCR检测血浆样本中结直肠癌KRAS突变的可靠性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e21171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021171.
2
The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字 PCR、ARMS 和 NGS 检测结直肠癌患者循环游离 DNA 中 KRAS 突变的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0248775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248775. eCollection 2021.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.循环游离 DNA 检测结直肠癌 KRAS 突变状态的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1218-1231. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1989. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.数字PCR、ARMS和NGS检测结直肠癌患者游离DNA中KRAS突变的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20708. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020708.
5
Reliability of BRAF mutation detection using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis.采用血浆样本检测 BRAF 基因突变的可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28382. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028382.
6
KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.成人转移性结直肠癌肿瘤的KRAS突变检测:一项系统评价与成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(62):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta18620.
7
Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.18F-FDG PET/CT 预测结直肠癌患者 KRAS 突变的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1703-1711. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-01891-3.
8
Circulating tumor DNA is effective for detection of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.循环肿瘤DNA对检测结直肠癌中的KRAS突变有效:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Biol Markers. 2017 Oct 31;32(4):e421-e427. doi: 10.5301/ijbm.5000295.
9
KRAS p.G13D mutation and codon 12 mutations are not created equal in predicting clinical outcomes of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.KRAS p.G13D 突变与 12 号密码子突变在预测转移性结直肠癌患者接受西妥昔单抗治疗的临床结局方面并非等效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):714-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27804. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
Detection of KRAS Mutations in Plasma DNA Using a fully Automated Rapid Detection System in Colorectal Cancer Patients.使用全自动快速检测系统检测结直肠癌患者血浆DNA中的KRAS突变
Pathol Oncol Res. 2017 Oct;23(4):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0175-1. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.循环游离 DNA 检测结直肠癌 KRAS 突变状态的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1218-1231. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1989. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Evaluation of three advanced methodologies, COLD-PCR, microarray and ddPCR, for identifying the mutational status by liquid biopsies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.评估三种先进方法,即 COLD-PCR、微阵列和 ddPCR,通过液体活检鉴定转移性结直肠癌患者的突变状态。
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Feb;489:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Prospective multicenter real-world RAS mutation comparison between OncoBEAM-based liquid biopsy and tissue analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer.
基于 OncoBEAM 的液体活检与组织分析在转移性结直肠癌中的前瞻性多中心真实世界 RAS 突变比较。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Dec;119(12):1464-1470. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0293-5. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
4
Measuring KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA by Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing.通过液滴数字PCR和下一代测序技术检测循环肿瘤DNA中的KRAS突变
Transl Oncol. 2018 Oct;11(5):1220-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
5
Monitoring circulating tumor DNA revealed dynamic changes in status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.监测循环肿瘤DNA发现转移性结直肠癌患者的状态呈动态变化。
Oncotarget. 2018 May 11;9(36):24398-24413. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25309.
6
Cross-platform comparison for the detection of RAS mutations in cfDNA (ddPCR Biorad detection assay, BEAMing assay, and NGS strategy).用于检测游离DNA中RAS突变的跨平台比较(数字PCR伯乐检测法、BEAMing检测法和二代测序策略)。
Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 20;9(30):21122-21131. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24950.
7
Targeting KRAS in metastatic colorectal cancer: current strategies and emerging opportunities.针对转移性结直肠癌中的 KRAS:当前策略和新出现的机会。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 13;37(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0719-1.
8
Evaluation of liquid biopsies for detection of emerging mutated genes in metastatic colorectal cancer.评估液体活检在转移性结直肠癌中检测新兴突变基因的应用。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.224. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Droplet-based digital PCR and next generation sequencing for monitoring circulating tumor DNA: a cancer diagnostic perspective.基于液滴的数字 PCR 和下一代测序技术用于监测循环肿瘤 DNA:癌症诊断视角。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;18(1):7-17. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1400384. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
RAS testing of liquid biopsy correlates with the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in the CAPRI-GOIM trial.液体活检中 RAS 检测与 CAPRI-GOIM 试验中接受一线 FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的结局相关。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):112-118. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx417.