Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):714-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27804. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with the v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) p.G13D mutation (an amino acid substitution at position 13 in KRAS from a glycine to an aspartic acid) and received cetuximab treatment had better clinical outcomes than patients who had mCRC tumors with KRAS codon 12 mutations.
Relevant studies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Database, and Wan Fang Digital Journals from inception to October 2011. The primary clinical outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using fixed-effects or random-effects models according to heterogeneity between studies.
Ten studies were considered eligible that included 1487 patients with mCRC. Patients who had tumors with the KRAS p.G13D mutation had a significantly higher ORR (10 studies; RR, 1.642; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.131-2.384), longer PFS (1 study; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81), and longer OS (1 study; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.80) than patients who had tumors with KRAS codon 12 mutations. Compared with patients who had KRAS wild-type tumors, patients with the p.G13D mutation had a significantly lower ORR (9 studies; RR, 0.540; 95% CI, 0.381-0.765) and nonsignificantly shorter PFS (1 study; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.68-1.45) and OS (1 study; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.66-1.54).
Patients who had mCRC with the KRAS p.G13D mutation appeared to benefit more from cetuximab than patients who had tumors with KRAS codon 12 mutations. However, because of the limited sample sizes in the current meta-analysis, these results should be interpreted with caution.
作者进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以检验携带转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)且 KRAS 密码子 13 发生 p.G13D 突变(KRAS 第 13 位氨基酸由甘氨酸突变为天冬氨酸)的患者接受西妥昔单抗治疗是否比携带 KRAS 密码子 12 突变的 mCRC 患者具有更好的临床结局。
通过检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库和万方数字化期刊,作者从建库至 2011 年 10 月进行了文献检索。主要临床结局包括客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据研究间的异质性,采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型来估计合并的相对危险度(RR)或风险比(HR)。
纳入了 10 项研究共 1487 例 mCRC 患者,符合纳入标准。与 KRAS 密码子 12 突变的肿瘤患者相比,KRAS p.G13D 突变的肿瘤患者具有更高的 ORR(10 项研究;RR,1.642;95%置信区间 [CI],1.131-2.384)、更长的 PFS(1 项研究;HR,0.54;95% CI,0.36-0.81)和 OS(1 项研究;HR,0.52;95% CI,0.33-0.80)。与 KRAS 野生型肿瘤患者相比,p.G13D 突变的肿瘤患者具有更低的 ORR(9 项研究;RR,0.540;95% CI,0.381-0.765)和非显著更短的 PFS(1 项研究;HR,0.99;95% CI,0.68-1.45)和 OS(1 项研究;HR,1.01;95% CI,0.66-1.54)。
与携带 KRAS 密码子 12 突变的肿瘤患者相比,携带 KRAS p.G13D 突变的 mCRC 患者似乎从西妥昔单抗治疗中获益更多。然而,由于当前荟萃分析的样本量有限,这些结果应谨慎解释。