School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen 361005, China.
Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies, Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen 361005, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 10;17(14):4976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144976.
In order to promote the employment of persons with disabilities, two dominant legal approaches-anti-discrimination legislation based on the social model of disability and an employment quota scheme based on the medical model-are usually employed on a nation-state basis in disability policies. This article systematically examines the reasons why both the anti-discrimination and employment quota scheme legal frameworks have limited effectiveness in promoting employment of persons with disabilities in China. We found that the lack of a definition of disability, the lack of a definition of discrimination, and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms are the reasons for poor outcomes of the anti-discrimination legal framework. For the employment quota scheme, conflicts between the mainstream labor market legal framework and the quota scheme legal framework have prompted employers to pay penalties rather than hire persons with disabilities. China should address these issues in the current legal system in the short term. Meanwhile, the CRPD should be more strongly emphasized in China. This article argues for the human rights model espoused by the CRPD, instead of the medical model, to develop a coherent and sustainable disability legal framework for promoting participation of persons with disabilities, rather than focusing on viewing them as recipients of care.
为了促进残疾人就业,各国在制定残疾人政策时,通常会采用两种主要的法律方法:基于残疾社会模式的反歧视立法和基于残疾医学模式的就业配额方案。本文系统地考察了反歧视和就业配额方案法律框架在中国促进残疾人就业方面效果有限的原因。我们发现,缺乏残疾定义、缺乏歧视定义以及缺乏有效的执行机制是反歧视法律框架效果不佳的原因。对于就业配额方案,主流劳动力市场法律框架和配额方案法律框架之间的冲突促使雇主宁愿支付罚款也不愿雇用残疾人。中国应在短期内解决当前法律体系中的这些问题。同时,中国应更加强调《残疾人权利公约》。本文主张采用《残疾人权利公约》所倡导的人权模式,而不是医学模式,为促进残疾人参与制定一个连贯和可持续的残疾法律框架,而不是将他们视为照顾对象。