Department of Cardiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. However, there is limited evidence on how their outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compare with those without IBD. All PCI-related hospitalizations from the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2015 were included, stratified into 3 groups: no-IBD, Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the association between IBD subtypes and in-hospital outcomes. A total of 6,689,292 PCI procedures were analyzed, of which 0.3% (n = 18,910) had an IBD diagnosis. The prevalence of IBD increased from 0.2% (2004) to 0.4% (2015). Patients with IBD were less likely to have conventional cardiovascular risk factors and more likely to undergo PCI for an acute indication, and to receive bare metal stents. In comparison to patients without IBD, those with IBD had reduced or similar adjusted odds ratios (OR) of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (CD OR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.78; UC OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85), mortality (CD: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.11; UC OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.45) or acute cerebrovascular accident (CD: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; UC: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15). However, IBD patients had an increased odds for major bleeding (CD: OR 1.42 95% CI 1.23 to 1.63, and UC: OR 1.35 95% CI 1.16 to 1.58). In summary, IBD is associated with a decreased risk of in-hospital post-PCI complications other than major bleeding that was significantly higher in this group. Long term follow-up is required to evaluate the safety of PCI in IBD patients from both bleeding and ischemic perspectives.
患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的患者发生缺血性心脏病的风险增加。然而,关于他们经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的结局与无 IBD 患者相比如何的证据有限。纳入了 2004 年至 2015 年全国住院患者样本中的所有与 PCI 相关的住院治疗,分为 3 组:无 IBD、克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。我们评估了 IBD 亚型与住院期间结局之间的关系。共分析了 6689292 例 PCI 手术,其中 0.3%(n=18910)有 IBD 诊断。IBD 的患病率从 0.2%(2004 年)增加到 0.4%(2015 年)。IBD 患者发生传统心血管危险因素的可能性较小,更有可能因急性指征而行 PCI,并接受金属裸支架治疗。与无 IBD 的患者相比,IBD 患者发生主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的调整后比值比(OR)降低或相似(CD OR 0.69,95%置信区间(CI)0.62 至 0.78;UC OR 0.75,95%CI 0.66 至 0.85)、死亡率(CD:OR 0.94,95%CI 0.79 至 1.11;UC:OR 0.35,95%CI 0.27 至 0.45)或急性脑血管意外(CD:OR 0.73,95%CI 0.60 至 0.89;UC:OR 0.94,95%CI 0.77 至 1.15)的风险降低。然而,IBD 患者发生大出血的几率更高(CD:OR 1.42,95%CI 1.23 至 1.63,UC:OR 1.35,95%CI 1.16 至 1.58)。总之,IBD 与除大出血以外的 PCI 后住院并发症的风险降低相关,而在该组中,出血风险显著更高。需要进行长期随访,以评估从出血和缺血角度来看,IBD 患者行 PCI 的安全性。