• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PC I)穿孔的趋势、预测因素和结局(来自 NCDR Cath PCI 注册研究)。

Contemporary Trends, Predictors and Outcomes of Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From the NCDR Cath PCI Registry).

机构信息

St David's Hospital, Austin, Texas.

Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014
PMID:32665131
Abstract

Coronary artery perforation (CP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given the marked increase in high-risk and complex PCIs, careful review and understanding of PCI complications may help to improve procedural and clinical outcomes. Our aim was to study the trends, predictors and outcomes of CP in the contemporary era. This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry between July 2009 and June 2015. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify predictors of CP and compare the in-hospital outcomes of CP and non-CP patients. Of 3,759,268 PCIs performed during the study period, there were 13,779 CP (0.37%). During the study period, the proportion of PCI that developed CP remained unchanged (0.33% to 0.4%) (p for trend 0.16). Chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI as percentage of total PCI volume increased over the study period (3% to 4%) (p for trend <0.001) with a concomitant significant increase in CTOs with perforation (1.2% to 1.5%, p for trend = 0.02). CTO PCI (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.59) female gender (OR 1.38), saphenous vein graft PCI (OR 1.2), ACC Type C lesion (1.48), cardiogenic shock on presentation (1.15), and use of atherectomy (laser/ rotational) (OR 2.38) were significant predictors of CP. CP patients had significantly higher rates of cardiogenic shock (7.73% vs 1.02%), tamponade (9.6% vs 0.05%) and death (4.87% vs 1.14%) compared with those without CP. Strongest predictors of any adverse events amongst CP were cardiogenic shock (OR 3.93), cardiac arrest (OR 2.02) and use of atherectomy device (OR 2.5). Use of covered stents was also strongly associated with adverse events (OR 3.67) reflecting severity of these CPs. CP in CTO PCI had higher rates of any adverse event than non-CTO CP (26.8% vs 22%, p < 0.001). However non-CTO CP had higher rates of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (urgent, emergent, or salvage) (5.8% vs 4.5%, p = 0.03) and death (6.9% vs 5.6%, p = 0.04). CP in CABG PCI had fewer adverse events compared with those without previous CABG (16.1% vs 24.7%). In a large real world experience, we identified several clinical and procedural factors associated with increased risk of CP and adverse outcomes. The trends in CP remained constant over the study period.

摘要

冠状动脉穿孔(CP)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一种罕见但潜在致命的并发症。鉴于高危和复杂 PCI 的明显增加,仔细审查和了解 PCI 并发症可能有助于改善程序和临床结果。我们的目的是研究当代 CP 的趋势、预测因素和结果。这项横断面多中心分析包括了 2009 年 7 月至 2015 年 6 月期间参加国家心血管数据注册 CathPCI 登记处的机构所收集的数据。多变量逻辑回归模型用于确定 CP 的预测因素,并比较 CP 和非 CP 患者的住院期间结局。在研究期间,共进行了 3759268 例 PCI,其中有 13779 例 CP(0.37%)。在研究期间,CP 发生的 PCI 比例保持不变(0.33%至 0.4%)(趋势 p 值为 0.16)。慢性完全闭塞(CTO)PCI 占总 PCI 量的比例在研究期间增加(从 3%增加至 4%)(趋势 p 值<0.001),同时伴有穿孔的 CTO 显著增加(从 1.2%增加至 1.5%,趋势 p 值=0.02)。CTO PCI(优势比[OR] 2.59)、女性(OR 1.38)、大隐静脉移植 PCI(OR 1.2)、ACC 类型 C 病变(OR 1.48)、入院时心源性休克(OR 1.15)和使用旋磨术(激光/旋转)(OR 2.38)是 CP 的显著预测因素。CP 患者的心源性休克(7.73%比 1.02%)、心脏压塞(9.6%比 0.05%)和死亡(4.87%比 1.14%)发生率明显高于非 CP 患者。CP 患者的任何不良事件最强预测因素为心源性休克(OR 3.93)、心脏骤停(OR 2.02)和旋磨术设备的使用(OR 2.5)。带膜支架的使用也与不良事件密切相关(OR 3.67),反映了这些 CP 的严重程度。CTO PCI 中的 CP 与非 CTO CP 相比,任何不良事件的发生率更高(26.8%比 22%,p<0.001)。然而,非 CTO CP 更倾向于进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(紧急、紧急或抢救)(5.8%比 4.5%,p=0.03)和死亡(6.9%比 5.6%,p=0.04)。CABG PCI 中的 CP 与无先前 CABG 的 CP 相比,不良事件发生率较低(16.1%比 24.7%)。在一项大规模真实世界研究中,我们确定了一些与 CP 风险增加和不良结局相关的临床和程序因素。CP 的趋势在研究期间保持不变。

相似文献

1
Contemporary Trends, Predictors and Outcomes of Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From the NCDR Cath PCI Registry).当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PC I)穿孔的趋势、预测因素和结局(来自 NCDR Cath PCI 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作结果:来自 NCDR(国家心血管数据注册中心)的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.014.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Complex Non-Occlusive Coronary Artery Disease.慢性完全闭塞血管再通与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂非闭塞性冠状动脉疾病的长期结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 15;125(2):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.034. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion-The Michigan Experience: Insights From the BMC2 Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞:密歇根经验:BMC2 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1357-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Legacy Effect of Coronary Perforation Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusive Disease: An Analysis of 26 807 Cases From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发冠状动脉穿孔的后遗症:英国心血管介入学会数据库 26807 例分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004642.
6
Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Perforation During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉穿孔的发生率、治疗及结局
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;120(8):1285-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Coronary Perforation Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: An Analysis of 309 Perforation Cases From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.冠状动脉穿孔并发经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的冠状动脉旁路手术史:英国心血管介入学会数据库中的 309 例穿孔病例分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005581.
8
Prevalence and Predictors of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (from the ORPKI National Registry in Poland).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉穿孔的发生率及预测因素(来自波兰的 ORPKI 国家注册中心)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1186-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Predictors, treatment, and long-term outcomes of coronary perforation during retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention via epicardial collaterals for recanalization of chronic coronary total occlusion.经心外膜侧支逆行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉病变中冠状动脉穿孔的预测因素、治疗方法和长期转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(S1):800-809. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28093. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Real-World Use and Appropriateness of Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry).慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉介入治疗的真实世界应用及适宜性(来自日本多中心注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;116(6):858-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Who Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.系统性免疫炎症指数对既往接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的慢性完全闭塞患者心血管事件的预测价值
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Nov 9;17:8611-8623. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S486692. eCollection 2024.
2
SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup.SCAI关于无现场外科支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的专家共识声明。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jan 30;2(2):100560. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100560. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
3
Nearly catastrophe coronary perforation: Is it second drug-eluting stent effective?
近乎灾难的冠状动脉穿孔:再次应用药物洗脱支架是否有效?
Narra J. 2024 Apr;4(1):e637. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i1.637. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Long-term outcomes of periprocedural coronary dissection and perforation for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a Japanese multicenter registry.日本多中心注册研究中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者围术期冠状动脉夹层和穿孔的长期预后。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47444-7.
5
Coronary Artery Perforation After Balloon Dilatation for Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis Inside the Double-Layered Previous Stents.双层既往支架内复发性支架内再狭窄行球囊扩张术后冠状动脉穿孔
JACC Case Rep. 2023 Aug 5;21:101976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101976. eCollection 2023 Sep 6.
6
Sex-specific Inequalities in the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Sub-analysis of the PREPARE-CALC Trial.严重钙化冠状动脉病变治疗中的性别特异性不平等:PREPARE-CALC试验的亚组分析。
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jan 20;18:e02. doi: 10.15420/icr.2022.07. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Intra- and Postprocedural Management of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉穿孔的术中及术后管理
Circ Rep. 2022 Oct 13;4(11):517-525. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0092. eCollection 2022 Nov 10.
8
Coronary perforation incidence, outcomes and temporal trends (COPIT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉穿孔发生率、结局和时间趋势(COPIT):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2022 Oct;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002076.
9
Multi-Center Experience of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Between 2010 and 2020.2010 年至 2020 年间经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心肌梗死穿孔的多中心经验:临床和血管造影特征、处理和结局。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Aug;26(8):608-618. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1337.
10
Safety and effectiveness of introducing a robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention program in a tertiary center: a prospective study.在三级医疗中心引入机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗项目的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022 Feb;12(1):67-76. doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-442.