Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Departments of Pathology and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Dec;20(6):e723-e748. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
Pathologic nipple discharge (PND) is one of the most common breast-related complaints for referral because of its supposed association with breast cancer. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound, mammogram, cytology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ductoscopy in patients with PND, as well as to determine the best diagnostic strategy to assess the risk of malignancy as cause for PND. Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched to collect relevant literature from the inception of each of the diagnostic methods until January 27, 2020. The search yielded 1472 original citations, of which 36 studies with 3764 patients were finally included for analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were performed using an NMA approach to evaluate the combined odd ratios and to determine the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the diagnostic value of different imaging methods for the detection of breast cancer in patients with PND. Additionally, a subgroup meta-analysis comparing ductoscopy to MRI when conventional imaging was negative was also performed. According to this NMA, sensitivity for detection of malignancy in patients with PND was highest for MRI (83%), followed by ductoscopy (58%), ultrasound (50%), cytology (38%), and mammogram (22%). Specificity was highest for mammogram (93%) followed by ductoscopy (92%), cytology (90%), MRI (76%), and ultrasound (69%). Diagnostic accuracy was the highest for ductoscopy (88%), followed by cytology (82%), MRI (77%), mammogram (76%), and ultrasound (65%). Subgroup meta-analysis (comparing ductoscopy to MRI when ultrasound and mammogram were negative) showed no significant difference in sensitivity, but ductoscopy was statistically significantly better with regard to specificity and diagnostic accuracy. The results from this NMA indicate that although ultrasound and mammogram may remain low-cost useful first choices for the detection of malignancy in patients with PND, ductoscopy outperforms most imaging techniques (especially MRI) and cytology.
乳头溢液(PND)是最常见的乳房相关转介症状之一,因为它与乳腺癌有关。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)的目的是比较超声、乳房 X 线照相术、细胞学、磁共振成像(MRI)和乳管镜检查在 PND 患者中的诊断效果,并确定评估 PND 恶性肿瘤风险的最佳诊断策略。从每个诊断方法的开始到 2020 年 1 月 27 日,Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed 和 Embase 被搜索以收集相关文献。搜索产生了 1472 条原始引文,其中 36 项研究共 3764 例患者最终被纳入分析。使用 NMA 方法进行直接和间接比较,以评估不同成像方法对 PND 患者乳腺癌检测的联合优势比,并确定不同成像方法检测 PND 患者乳腺癌的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)。此外,还进行了一项亚组荟萃分析,比较了常规成像阴性时乳管镜检查与 MRI 的比较。根据这项 NMA,在 PND 患者中检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性,MRI 最高(83%),其次是乳管镜检查(58%)、超声(50%)、细胞学(38%)和乳房 X 线照相术(22%)。特异性最高的是乳房 X 线照相术(93%),其次是乳管镜检查(92%)、细胞学(90%)、MRI(76%)和超声(69%)。诊断准确性最高的是乳管镜检查(88%),其次是细胞学(82%)、MRI(77%)、乳房 X 线照相术(76%)和超声(65%)。亚组荟萃分析(比较超声和乳房 X 线照相术阴性时乳管镜检查与 MRI 的比较)显示,敏感性没有显著差异,但特异性和诊断准确性方面,乳管镜检查明显更好。这项 NMA 的结果表明,尽管超声和乳房 X 线照相术可能仍然是检测 PND 患者恶性肿瘤的低成本有用首选方法,但乳管镜检查优于大多数成像技术(尤其是 MRI)和细胞学。