Suppr超能文献

多基因风险评分与携带 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 致病性变异的个体的乳腺癌和上皮性卵巢癌风险。

Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Epidemiology (PSOE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2020 Oct;22(10):1653-1666. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort.

RESULTS

The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25-1.33], P = 3×10). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27-1.36], P = 7×10). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25-1.40], P = 3×10) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30-1.60], P = 4×10) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar.

CONCLUSION

Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.

摘要

目的

我们评估了基于人群的多基因风险评分(PRS)与 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 致病性变异携带者乳腺癌(BC)或上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)风险之间的关联。

方法

我们获得了 18935 名欧洲裔 BRCA1 和 12339 名 BRCA2 女性致病性变异携带者的回顾性队列数据。评估了三种基于是否预测总体、雌激素受体(ER)阴性或 ER 阳性 BC 的 313 个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)BC PRS 版本,以及两种用于总体或高级别浆液性 EOC 的 PRS。在一个前瞻性队列中验证了关联。

结果

ER 阴性 PRS 与 BRCA1 携带者的 BC 风险相关性最强(每标准差风险比 [HR] = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25-1.33],P = 3×10)。对于 BRCA2,最强的关联是总体 BC PRS(HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27-1.36],P = 7×10)。HR 估计值随年龄显著下降,并且存在预测变异对蛋白质表达影响的关联差异的证据。HR 估计值小于一般人群的估计值。高级别浆液性 PRS 与 BRCA1(HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25-1.40],P = 3×10)和 BRCA2(HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30-1.60],P = 4×10)携带者的 EOC 风险相关性最强。前瞻性队列中的关联相似。

结论

基于人群的 PRS 与 BRCA1/2 携带者的 BC 和 EOC 风险密切相关,并预测 PRS 分布极端的女性存在实质性的绝对风险差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3791/7521995/ee55cb099d65/41436_2020_862_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验