LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Neuromotor and Rehabilitation, San Sebastiano di Correggio Hospital, USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Department of Rehabilitation Geriatrics, NHS-University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):537-546. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06148-1. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Controlling inappropriateness of care is an essential issue, especially in rehabilitation medicine. In fact, admitting a patient to a rehabilitation hospital or unit is a complex decision also due to the absence of shared and objective admission criteria.
The aim was to define clinical admission criteria and rules in rehabilitation medicine.
Survey based on the application of the Delphi method on a sample of rehabilitation medicine experts.
Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning appropriateness of admission to intensive rehabilitation.
Volunteer sample of 53 experts with the following inclusion criteria: being members of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, having practical experience in the research field, agreeing to the confidentiality of the information and being skilled in both rehabilitation and healthcare organization.
A three-round Delphi survey was conducted according to international guidelines. The two initial rounds consisted of an electronic online questionnaire while in the third one a report of the results was provided to the participants. The experts had to score their agreement with each item in the questionnaires, based on either a Likert scale or a dichotomous statement. Consensus between the experts was assessed.
A total of 53 health professionals completed the Delphi survey. 19 out of 20 Italian regions were represented. The first round consisted of 8 multiple-choice questions. The second round was designed according to the suggestions provided by the panelists in the previous one and consisted of a twelve items questionnaire. At the end of the survey, seven criteria of appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation were identified and five rules defining an appropriate admission to a rehabilitation facility were elaborated.
This study represents an attempt to create a worthwhile and reliable tool for a more conscious clinical practice in admission to rehabilitation, based on a set of shared criteria and rules.
To increase appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation. Improving appropriateness in healthcare delivery must be a primary goal in order to improve healthcare quality, save money and ensure system sustainability.
控制医疗服务的不当提供是一个至关重要的问题,尤其是在康复医学领域。事实上,由于缺乏共同和客观的入院标准,将患者收治到康复医院或病房也是一个复杂的决策。
旨在确定康复医学的临床入院标准和规则。
基于德尔菲法的调查,针对康复医学专家样本进行。
关于强化康复入院适宜性的电子在线问卷管理。
具有以下纳入标准的 53 名专家自愿样本:是意大利物理和康复医学学会的成员,具有研究领域的实践经验,同意信息保密,并精通康复和医疗保健组织。
根据国际指南进行了三轮德尔菲调查。前两轮包括电子在线问卷,而在第三轮中,向参与者提供了结果报告。专家必须根据李克特量表或二分法对问卷中的每个项目的同意程度进行评分。评估专家之间的共识。
共有 53 名卫生专业人员完成了德尔菲调查。代表了 20 个意大利地区中的 19 个。第一轮包括 8 个多项选择题。第二轮是根据前一轮小组成员的建议设计的,由 12 个项目的问卷组成。调查结束时,确定了 7 项康复入院适宜性标准,并制定了 5 项定义康复机构适宜入院的规则。
这项研究试图根据一套共同的标准和规则,为更有意识的康复入院临床实践创建一个有价值且可靠的工具。
提高康复入院的适宜性。提高医疗服务的适宜性必须是首要目标,以提高医疗质量、节省资金并确保系统可持续性。