• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部脓毒症病灶清除时间与脓毒症患者的死亡率。

Time to clearance of abdominal septic focus and mortality in patients with sepsis.

机构信息

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Jun;32(2):245-250. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200029. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

DOI:10.5935/0103-507x.20200029
PMID:32667437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7405735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between time to focus clearance and hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

This was an observational, single-center study with a retrospective analysis of the time to clearance of abdominal septic focus. Patients were classified according to the time to focus clearance into an early (≤ 12 hours) or delayed (> 12 hours) group.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were evaluated. There was no association between time to focus clearance and hospital mortality (≤ 12 hours versus > 12 hours): 52.3% versus 52.9%, with p = 0.137.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in hospital mortality among patients with sepsis or septic shock who had an infectious focus evacuated before or after 12 hours after the diagnosis of sepsis.

摘要

目的

评估脓毒症和感染性休克患者焦点清除时间与住院死亡率之间的关系。

方法

这是一项观察性、单中心研究，对腹部感染焦点清除时间进行回顾性分析。根据焦点清除时间将患者分为早期（≤12 小时）或延迟（＞12 小时）组。

结果

共评估了 135 例患者。焦点清除时间与住院死亡率之间无关联（≤12 小时与＞12 小时）：52.3%与 52.9%，p=0.137。

结论

在诊断为脓毒症后 12 小时之前或之后清除感染灶的脓毒症或感染性休克患者，其住院死亡率无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9700/7405735/09954537d27b/rbti-32-02-0245-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9700/7405735/09954537d27b/rbti-32-02-0245-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9700/7405735/09954537d27b/rbti-32-02-0245-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Time to clearance of abdominal septic focus and mortality in patients with sepsis.腹部脓毒症病灶清除时间与脓毒症患者的死亡率。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Jun;32(2):245-250. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200029. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of polymyxin-B immobilized fiber column and conventional medical therapy in the management of abdominal septic shock in Italy.意大利应用多黏菌素 B 固定纤维柱与常规治疗方案治疗腹腔感染性休克的成本效果分析。
Blood Purif. 2011;32(4):331-40. doi: 10.1159/000333826. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
3
Comparison of Survival Prediction with Single versus Combination Use of Microcirculation End Point Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克中微循环终点复苏单药使用与联合使用的生存预测比较
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Oct;50(4):275-282.
4
Impact of Source Control in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的源头控制的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002011.
5
Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.早期目标导向治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的Meta 分析和随机对照试验序贯分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 May;33(5):296-309. doi: 10.1177/0885066616671710. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性：可提高生存率，亡羊补牢，为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
Risk factors for mortality despite early protocolized resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克进行早期规范化复苏后仍存在的死亡风险因素。
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
9
Quality Improvement Initiative for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Reduces 90-Day Mortality: A 7.5-Year Observational Study.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克质量改进计划降低 90 天死亡率：一项 7.5 年观察性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):241-252. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002069.
10
Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的液体管理、模式和结局：对大型国家数据库的分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis survivors readmitted within 30 days: outcomes of a single-center retrospective study.30天内再次入院的脓毒症幸存者：一项单中心回顾性研究的结果
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Dec 16;36:e20240116en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240116-en. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.严重腹腔内感染开放性腹腔处理中早期与延迟源头控制的比较：111例回顾性分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y.
2
The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study.巴西重症监护病房脓毒症的流行病学（脓毒症患病率评估数据库，SPREAD）：一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference.
腹腔内感染的处理：WSES 2016 共识会议的建议。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 May 4;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7. eCollection 2017.
4
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动：脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南：2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
5
Impact of Source Control in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的源头控制的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002011.
6
The impact of early surgical intervention in free intestinal perforation: a time-to-intervention pilot study.早期手术干预对游离性肠穿孔的影响：一项干预时机的初步研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Nov 6;10:54. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0047-0. eCollection 2015.
7
Time from admission to initiation of surgery for source control is a critical determinant of survival in patients with gastrointestinal perforation with associated septic shock.从入院到开始进行手术以控制感染源的时间是伴有感染性休克的胃肠道穿孔患者生存的关键决定因素。
Crit Care. 2014 May 2;18(3):R87. doi: 10.1186/cc13854.
8
Diagnostics, therapy and outcome prediction in abdominal sepsis: current standards and future perspectives.腹部脓毒症的诊断、治疗及预后预测：当前标准与未来展望
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):11-22. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1132-z. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
9
Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.巴西公立和私立医院脓毒症治疗和结局的差异：一项多中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 6;8(6):e64790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064790. Print 2013.
10
Surgical delay is a critical determinant of survival in perforated peptic ulcer.手术时机是影响穿孔性消化性溃疡患者生存的关键决定因素。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jul;100(8):1045-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9175.