• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重腹腔内感染开放性腹腔处理中早期与延迟源头控制的比较:111例回顾性分析

Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.

作者信息

Rausei Stefano, Pappalardo Vincenzo, Ruspi Laura, Colella Antonio, Giudici Simone, Ardita Vincenzo, Frattini Francesco, Rovera Francesca, Boni Luigi, Dionigi Gianlorenzo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Viale Luigi Borri 57, 21100, Varese, Italy.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y
PMID:28936682
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Time to source control plays a determinant prognostic role in patients having severe intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Open abdomen (OA) management became an effective treatment option for peritonitis. Aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between time to source control and outcome in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis and treated by OA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients affected by abdominal sepsis and treated with OA from May 2007 to May 2015. Patients were classified according to time interval from first patient evaluation to source control. The end points were intra-hospital mortality and primary fascial closure rate.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 21.6% (24/111), and the primary fascial closure rate was 90.9% (101/111). A time to source control ≥6 h resulted significantly associated with a poor prognosis and a lower fascial closure rate (mortality 27.0 vs 9.0%, p = 0.04; primary fascial closure 86 vs 100%, p = 0.02). We observed a direct increase in mortality (and a reduction in closure rate) for each 6-h delay in surgery to source control.

CONCLUSION

Early source control using OA management significantly improves outcome of patients with severe IAIs. This damage control approach well fits to the treatment of time-related conditions, particularly in case of critically ill patients.

摘要

背景

对于患有严重腹腔内感染(IAIs)的患者,实现源头控制的时间起着决定性的预后作用。开放腹腔(OA)管理已成为治疗腹膜炎的一种有效选择。本研究的目的是分析腹腔脓毒症患者采用OA治疗时,源头控制时间与预后之间的相关性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年5月至2015年5月期间111例接受OA治疗的腹腔脓毒症患者。根据从首次评估患者到实现源头控制的时间间隔对患者进行分类。终点指标为院内死亡率和一期筋膜关闭率。

结果

院内死亡率为21.6%(24/111),一期筋膜关闭率为90.9%(101/111)。源头控制时间≥6小时与预后不良和筋膜关闭率较低显著相关(死亡率分别为27.0%和9.0%,p = 0.04;一期筋膜关闭率分别为86%和100%,p = 0.02)。我们观察到,手术至源头控制每延迟6小时,死亡率直接增加(筋膜关闭率降低)。

结论

采用OA管理进行早期源头控制可显著改善严重IAIs患者的预后。这种损伤控制方法非常适合治疗与时间相关的病症,尤其是在危重症患者中。

相似文献

1
Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.严重腹腔内感染开放性腹腔处理中早期与延迟源头控制的比较:111例回顾性分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y.
2
Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study.网片介导筋膜牵张的真空辅助伤口闭合优于单纯真空辅助伤口闭合:一项比较研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1679-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4354-3.
3
Fascial closure after open abdomen: initial indication and early revisions are decisive factors--a retrospective cohort study.开放性腹部手术后的筋膜关闭:初始指征和早期修正术是决定性因素——一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
4
Fluid volume overload negatively influences delayed primary facial closure in open abdomen management.液体容量超负荷会对开放性腹部管理中延迟初次面部关闭产生负面影响。
J Surg Res. 2014 Mar;187(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.032. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
5
Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.严重腹部脓毒症的开放性腹腔关闭方法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1819-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Fascia-to-fascia closure with abdominal topical negative pressure for severe abdominal infections: preliminary results in a department of general surgery and intensive care unit.筋膜对筋膜关闭联合腹部创面负压治疗严重腹部感染:普通外科和重症监护病房的初步结果。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;11(6):523-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.042.
7
Vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction for primary closure of the open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients.重症外科患者开放性腹部初次缝合中应用真空和网片介导的筋膜牵引。
Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1725-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8914. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
8
Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate.在腹部脓毒症患者中使用市售负压封闭引流系统治疗开放性腹部伤口:一期缝合率低。
World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2724-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9762-y.
9
Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction.开放性腹部手术后使用真空和网片介导筋膜牵引闭合筋膜的多中心前瞻性研究。
Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):735-43. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7383. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
Superior primary fascial closure rate and lower mortality after open abdomen using negative pressure wound therapy with continuous fascial traction.使用负压创面治疗联合持续筋膜牵张技术行开放性腹部手术后初级筋膜闭合率更高,死亡率更低。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1136-1142. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002889.

引用本文的文献

1
Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.非创伤性腹部急症中的损伤控制手术:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)及曼海姆腹膜炎指数的预后价值
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01984-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Sepsis, Management & Advances in Metabolomics.脓毒症:代谢组学的管理与进展。
Nanotheranostics. 2024 Feb 25;8(3):270-284. doi: 10.7150/ntno.94071. eCollection 2024.
3
Timing of surgical operation for patients with intra-abdominal infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
2
Fluid resuscitation in human sepsis: Time to rewrite history?人类脓毒症中的液体复苏:是时候改写历史了?
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0231-8. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Abdominal Sepsis.腹部脓毒症
腹腔内感染患者手术时机:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct 27;15(10):2320-2330. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2320.
4
Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines.急诊普通外科中的源头控制:WSES、GAIS、SIS-E、SIS-A 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jul 21;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00509-4.
5
Epidemiological Characteristics, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile, and Surgical Outcome of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection at a Tertiary Hospital in Somalia.索马里一家三级医院复杂腹腔内感染的流行病学特征、抗菌药物敏感性概况及手术结果
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 22;15:7427-7434. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S379711. eCollection 2022.
6
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.负压伤口疗法在非创伤患者中用于管理开放性腹部。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD013710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2.
7
Rate of stoma formation following damage-control surgery for severe intra-abdominal sepsis: a single-centre consecutive case series.严重腹腔内感染行损伤控制性手术后造口形成率:单中心连续病例系列研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Nov 9;5(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab106.
8
Lessons Learned in 11 Years of Experience With Open Abdomen Treatment With Negative-Pressure Therapy for Various Abdominal Emergencies.负压治疗开放性腹腔应对各种腹部急症11年经验总结
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 4;8:632929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.632929. eCollection 2021.
9
What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study.我们对波兰医院脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理了解多少?一项问卷调查研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 1;9(2):140. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020140.
10
Current progress of source control in the management of intra-abdominal infections.目前在腹腔感染管理中源控制的进展。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Dec;23(6):311-313. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Aug;18(8):23. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0531-z.
4
The Changing Epidemiology and Definitions of Sepsis.脓毒症不断变化的流行病学及定义
Clin Chest Med. 2016 Jun;37(2):165-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis: The Importance of Early Source Control and Antifungal Treatment.腹腔念珠菌病:早期源头控制和抗真菌治疗的重要性
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0153247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153247. eCollection 2016.
6
The role of the open abdomen procedure in managing severe abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.开放腹腔手术在处理严重腹部脓毒症中的作用:世界急诊外科学会立场文件
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug 12;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0032-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Management of abdominal sepsis--a paradigm shift?腹部脓毒症的管理——是一种范式转变吗?
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):400-8. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0026. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.腹腔内感染管理指南。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.非创伤患者开放性腹部及临时腹部关闭技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项长达 7.5 年的研究中,绩效指标与结局之间的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0. Epub 2014 Oct 1.