• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness of treatment options against SARS-CoV-2 infection.针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的治疗方案有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):775-785. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26302. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Review of Emerging Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病治疗药物的研究进展。
Pharmacotherapy. 2020 May;40(5):416-437. doi: 10.1002/phar.2398. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
[The praise of uncertainty: a systematic living review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug treatments for patients with covid-19.].[对不确定性的赞誉:一项系统的循证综述,以评估新冠病毒疾病患者药物治疗的疗效和安全性。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2021 Mar;112(3):195-206. doi: 10.1701/3565.35458.
4
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.氯喹或羟氯喹预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
5
Psychopharmacology of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的精神药理学。
Psychosomatics. 2020 Sep-Oct;61(5):411-427. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Early experience with remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.瑞德西韦治疗 SARS-CoV-2 肺炎的早期经验。
Infection. 2020 Oct;48(5):779-782. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01448-x. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Safety and efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in symptomatic patients of Covid-19 infection - a randomised controlled trial (SEV-COVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.抗病毒联合治疗在新冠病毒感染有症状患者中的安全性和有效性 - 一项随机对照试验(SEV-COVID 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 20;21(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04774-5.
8
Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.瑞德西韦、羟氯喹和洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗 COVID-19 的不良反应:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 2;12(3):e048502. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048502.
9
Pooled analysis of the MANTICO2 and MONET randomized controlled trials comparing drug efficacy for early treatment of COVID-19 during Omicron waves.奥密克戎变异株流行期间比较 COVID-19 早期治疗药物疗效的 MANTICO2 和 MONET 随机对照研究的汇总分析。
J Infect. 2024 Nov;89(5):106294. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106294. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
10
A Review of the Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy of Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Lopinavir-Ritonavir Treatments against COVID-19.瑞德西韦、羟氯喹和洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗 COVID-19 的临床前和临床疗效评价综述。
SLAS Discov. 2020 Dec;25(10):1108-1122. doi: 10.1177/2472555220958385. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Dexamethasone chronotherapy of COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit: an exploratory study.重症监护病房收治的COVID-19患者的地塞米松时间疗法:一项探索性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11322-6.
2
Clinical and pharmacological factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 in a high complexity hospital in Manaus: A retrospective study.临床和药理学因素与马瑙斯一家高复杂度医院 COVID-19 患者死亡率的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0280891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280891. eCollection 2023.
3
Potential limitations in systematic review studies assessing the effect of the main intervention for treatment/therapy of COVID-19 patients: An overview.评估新冠病毒疾病患者治疗/疗法主要干预措施效果的系统评价研究中的潜在局限性:概述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 15;9:966632. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.966632. eCollection 2022.
4
Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab´)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: A retrospective cohort study.RBD 特异性多克隆马 F(ab´)2 片段治疗住院严重 COVID-19 患者的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 26;17(9):e0274796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274796. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19: An umbrella review.托珠单抗治疗 COVID-19 的疗效:一项伞状评价。
Rev Med Virol. 2022 Nov;32(6):e2388. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2388. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Predicting Mutational Effects on Receptor Binding of the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Variants.预测新冠病毒变异株刺突蛋白受体结合的突变效应
J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Oct 27;143(42):17646-17654. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c07965. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.新冠康复期血浆疗法的安全性与有效性:系统评价综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 11;11(9):1663. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091663.
8
Tocilizumab in COVID-19: Factors Associated With Mortality Before and After Treatment.托珠单抗治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎:治疗前后与死亡率相关的因素
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 1;12:620187. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.620187. eCollection 2021.
9
What gastroenterologists should know about SARS-CoV 2 vaccine: World Endoscopy Organization perspective.胃肠病学家应该了解的关于 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的知识:世界内镜组织的观点。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Sep;9(7):787-796. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12103. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cancer Patients Affected by a Novel Coronavirus.新型冠状病毒感染癌症患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Feb 24;5(2):pkaa102. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa102. eCollection 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes and Plasma Concentrations of Baloxavir Marboxil and Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Randomized, Controlled Trial.COVID-19 患者巴洛沙韦马立克韦和法维拉韦的临床结局和血浆浓度:一项探索性随机对照试验。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Feb 1;157:105631. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
2
Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.羟氯喹在美国 COVID-19 住院患者中的使用效果。
Med. 2020 Dec 18;1(1):114-127.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
Adjuvant corticosteroid therapy for critically ill patients with COVID-19.COVID-19重症患者的辅助性皮质类固醇治疗
Crit Care. 2020 May 19;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02964-w.
4
Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.瑞德西韦治疗成人重症 COVID-19 的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1569-1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Hydroxychloroquine in patients with mainly mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019: open label, randomised controlled trial.羟氯喹治疗主要为轻症和中症的 2019 冠状病毒病患者:开放标签、随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2020 May 14;369:m1849. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1849.
6
Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State.纽约州 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率与羟氯喹或阿奇霉素治疗的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2493-2502. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8630.
7
[A pilot study of hydroxychloroquine in treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19].羟氯喹治疗中度新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的一项试点研究
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 May 25;49(2):215-219. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03.
8
Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 住院患者的观察性研究。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2411-2418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012410. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab.托珠单抗治疗重症 COVID-19 患者有效。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10970-10975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005615117. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高剂量与低剂量磷酸氯喹作为辅助治疗对住院的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染患者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 24;3(4):e208857. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8857.

针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的治疗方案有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness of treatment options against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):775-785. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26302. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1002/jmv.26302
PMID:32667699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7404948/
Abstract

Treatment options for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are limited with no clarity on efficacy and safety profiles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on patients ≥18 years reporting data on therapeutic interventions in SARS-CoV-2. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of mechanical ventilation, viral clearance, adverse events, discharge, and progression to severe disease. Pooled rates and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Twenty-nine studies with 5207 patients were included. Pooled all-cause mortality in intervention arm was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1%-17.4%). Mortality was significantly higher for studies using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for intervention (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.97-1.89). Adverse events were also higher in HCQ subgroup (OR: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.60-9.45). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. There is a need for well-designed randomized clinical trials for further investigation of every therapeutic intervention for further insight into different therapeutic options.

摘要

治疗严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的方法有限,其疗效和安全性尚不清楚。我们对≥18 岁的患者进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,这些患者报告了 SARS-CoV-2 治疗干预的数据。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局是机械通气、病毒清除、不良事件、出院和疾病进展的发生率。计算了汇总率和比值比(OR)。纳入了 29 项研究,共 5207 例患者。干预组的全因死亡率为 12.8%(95%置信区间:8.1%-17.4%)。使用羟氯喹(HCQ)进行干预的研究死亡率显著更高(OR:1.36;95%置信区间:0.97-1.89)。HCQ 亚组的不良事件发生率也更高(OR:3.88;95%置信区间:1.60-9.45)。其他次要结局无差异。需要进行精心设计的随机临床试验,以进一步研究每种治疗干预措施,以深入了解不同的治疗选择。