Fawcett Timothy J, Cooper Chad S, Longenecker Ryan J, Walton Joseph P
Global Center for Hearing and Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Research Computing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Global Center for Hearing and Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Oct 1;344:108853. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108853. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
The acoustic startle response (ASR) is a simple reflex that results in a whole body motor response after animals hear a brief loud sound and is used as a multisensory tool across many disciplines. Unfortunately, a method of how to record, process, and analyze ASRs has yet to be standardized, leading to high variability in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of ASRs within and between laboratories.
ASR waveforms collected from young adult CBA/CaJ mice were normalized with features extracted from the waveform, the resulting power spectral density estimates, and the continuous wavelet transforms. The features were then partitioned into training and test/validation sets. Machine learning methods from different families of algorithms were used to combine startle-related features into robust predictive models to predict whether an ASR waveform is a startle or non-startle.
An ensemble of several machine learning models resulted in an extremely robust model to predict whether an ASR waveform is a startle or non-startle with a mean ROC of 0.9779, training accuracy of 0.9993, and testing accuracy of 0.9301.
ASR waveforms analyzed using the threshold and RMS techniques resulted in over 80% of accepted startles actually being non-startles when manually classified versus 2.2% for the machine learning method, resulting in statistically significant differences in ASR metrics (such as startle amplitude and pre-pulse inhibition) between classification methods.
The machine learning approach presented in this paper can be adapted to nearly any ASR paradigm to accurately process, sort, and classify startle responses.
听觉惊吓反应(ASR)是一种简单的反射,动物听到短暂的响亮声音后会产生全身运动反应,并且在许多学科中被用作一种多感官工具。不幸的是,如何记录、处理和分析ASR的方法尚未标准化,导致不同实验室内部和之间在ASR的收集、分析和解释方面存在很大差异。
从年轻成年CBA/CaJ小鼠收集的ASR波形通过从波形中提取的特征、所得的功率谱密度估计值和连续小波变换进行归一化。然后将这些特征划分为训练集和测试/验证集。使用来自不同算法家族的机器学习方法将与惊吓相关的特征组合成强大的预测模型,以预测ASR波形是惊吓还是非惊吓。
几个机器学习模型的集成产生了一个极其强大的模型,用于预测ASR波形是惊吓还是非惊吓,平均受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC)为0.9779,训练准确率为0.9993,测试准确率为0.9301。
使用阈值和均方根(RMS)技术分析的ASR波形在人工分类时,超过80%被接受的惊吓实际上是非惊吓,而机器学习方法为2.2%,这导致分类方法之间在ASR指标(如惊吓幅度和预脉冲抑制)上存在统计学显著差异。
本文提出的机器学习方法几乎可以适用于任何ASR范式,以准确地处理、分类和区分惊吓反应。