TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, CICERO Centre for International Climate Research, University of Oslo, Norway.
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Feb;51(1):3-27. doi: 10.1177/0306312720941933. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Over the last 10 years, the concept of a global 'carbon budget' of allowable CO emissions has become ubiquitous in climate science and policy. Since it was brought to prominence by the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC, the carbon budget has changed how climate change is enacted as an issue of public concern, from determining the optimal rate of future emissions to establishing a fixed limit for how much emissions should be allowed before they must be stopped altogether. Exploring the emergence of the carbon budget concept, this article shows how the assessment process of the IPCC has offered scientific experts the means to modify how the climate issue is problematized, and discusses the implications of this 'modifying-work' for the politics of climate change. It finds that the 'modified climate issue' must be seen as an outcome of the ordinary work within established scientific and political institutions, and the agency these institutions afford scientists to enact the issue differently. On this basis, it argues that the case of the carbon budget holds important insights not only for the relationship between climate science and policy, but also for the pragmatist literature on 'issue formation' in STS.
在过去的 10 年中,允许 CO2 排放的全球“碳预算”概念在气候科学和政策中无处不在。自 IPCC 第五次评估报告将其突出以来,碳预算改变了气候变化作为公众关注问题的实施方式,从确定未来排放的最佳速度到为必须完全停止排放之前设定允许排放的固定限制。本文探讨了碳预算概念的出现,展示了 IPCC 的评估过程如何为科学专家提供了修改气候问题的方法,并讨论了这种“修改工作”对气候变化政治的影响。它发现,“修改后的气候问题”必须被视为既定科学和政治机构内的常规工作的结果,以及这些机构为科学家提供的实施问题的不同机构。在此基础上,它认为碳预算的案例不仅对气候科学与政策之间的关系具有重要意义,而且对 STS 中关于“问题形成”的实用主义文献也具有重要意义。