Retzer Ameeta, Kaye Jane, Gray Ron
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Br J Soc Work. 2020 Jun;50(4):1185-1200. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz076. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
Literature suggests that, as parents, people with intellectual disabilities experience disproportionately high rates of child removal compared to other groups. A factorial survey of 191 children's social workers investigated the effect of disclosing parental intellectual disability (ID) upon risk assessments in a range of hypothetical child safeguarding scenarios. The case scenarios depicted a range of child safeguarding situations and parents' ID status was randomly included as an additional item of information. The data were fitted into a generalised ordinal logistic regression model. Findings indicate that when presented with scenarios considered to be less risky, the parental ID disclosure contributed significantly to a higher risk assessment score. However, when presented with scenarios that were considered more risky, the additional parental ID disclosure did not significantly contribute to a higher score. These findings indicate that the risk associated with parental ID is not fixed but relative to the situation in which it is encountered. The research concludes that in cases of low risk, the effect of parental ID is identified as a support need, whereas the lesser contribution of the disclosure to assessments of higher risk cases may indicate that parental ID is overlooked.
文献表明,作为父母,与其他群体相比,智障人士的子女被带走的比例高得不成比例。一项对191名儿童社会工作者的析因调查研究了在一系列假设的儿童保护场景中披露父母智力残疾(ID)对风险评估的影响。案例场景描绘了一系列儿童保护情况,父母的ID状态被随机列为一项额外信息。数据被纳入广义有序逻辑回归模型。研究结果表明,当面对被认为风险较低的场景时,披露父母的ID会显著提高风险评估得分。然而,当面对被认为风险较高的场景时,额外披露父母的ID并不会显著提高得分。这些结果表明,与父母ID相关的风险不是固定不变的,而是相对于遇到该情况的背景而言的。研究得出结论,在低风险情况下,父母ID的影响被视为一种支持需求,而在高风险案例评估中披露的影响较小,这可能表明父母的ID被忽视了。