Vidrio Duarte Ramon, Martínez Martínez Antonio Ramiro, Ortega León Luis H, Gutierrez Ochoa Juan, Ramírez Nava Ariel, López Sámano Gustavo, Torres Del Real Daniel, Vidrio Duarte Eduardo
General Surgery, Hospital General De México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, MEX.
Emergency, Hospital Central Sur De Alta Especialidad Pemex, Mexico City, MEX.
Cureus. 2020 Jul 10;12(7):e9113. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9113.
Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently one of the most commonly performed procedures globally. Morbidity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is low; however, bile duct injury is still a feared complication. Despite worldwide efforts, the global incidence of bile duct injury remains higher for laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy. Despite the general belief that the learning curve and lack of laparoscopic skills represent the most common causes of bile duct injuries, the principal cause is the misidentification of biliary anatomy. The aim of our study is to determine if laparoscopic transillumination is a feasible approach to bile and vascular structures visualization during laparoscopic cholecystectomy because the only other method for real-time visualization is fluorescent cholangiography, which can be cost-prohibitive and requires specialized equipment and training. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes between the transillumination approach in 10 patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy (group A) and a control group of 50 conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (group B). We compared demographic data, type of surgery, operative time, bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay. We used a conventional four-port positioning for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and a 5-mm/30° scope was used as a light source and placed behind the area identified as Calot's triangle. Results Group A consisted of 10 patients (9 women, 1 man), with a mean age of 50.7 (± 17.4) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) in group A was 26.8 (± 0.65) kg/m. In group A, three of the cholecystectomies were conducted as emergency procedures. Group B consisted of 50 patients (40 women, 10 men), with a mean age of 49.7 (±15.2) years. The mean BMI in group B was 27.5 (±4.5) kg/m, and two cholecystectomies were emergency procedures. In comparing the transillumination approach with conventional cholecystectomy, we found no statistical differences in operative time, bleeding, complications, or mean hospital stay. Conclusions Laparoscopic transillumination is a feasible method for real-time visualization of Calot's triangle structures. Our initial experience with transillumination did not provide better outcomes than conventional cholecystectomy.
背景 腹腔镜胆囊切除术是目前全球最常开展的手术之一。腹腔镜胆囊切除术的发病率较低;然而,胆管损伤仍是令人担忧的并发症。尽管全球都在努力,但与开腹胆囊切除术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术的全球胆管损伤发生率仍然较高。尽管人们普遍认为学习曲线和缺乏腹腔镜技术是胆管损伤最常见的原因,但主要原因是胆管解剖结构的误认。我们研究的目的是确定腹腔镜透照法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中是否是一种可行的观察胆管和血管结构的方法,因为唯一的实时观察方法是荧光胆管造影,其成本高昂,且需要专门的设备和培训。
材料与方法 我们对10例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者(A组)采用透照法与50例传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者(B组)的结果进行了回顾性比较。我们比较了人口统计学数据、手术类型、手术时间、出血量、术中及术后并发症以及住院时间。我们采用传统的四孔定位进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并使用5毫米/30°的腹腔镜作为光源,置于被确定为胆囊三角的区域后方。
结果 A组包括10例患者(9名女性,1名男性),平均年龄为50.7(±17.4)岁。A组的平均体重指数(BMI)为26.8(±0.65)kg/m²。在A组中,3例胆囊切除术为急诊手术。B组包括50例患者(40名女性,10名男性),平均年龄为49.7(±15.2)岁。B组的平均BMI为27.5(±4.5)kg/m²,2例胆囊切除术为急诊手术。在将透照法与传统胆囊切除术进行比较时,我们发现手术时间、出血量、并发症或平均住院时间没有统计学差异。
结论 腹腔镜透照法是实时观察胆囊三角结构的一种可行方法。我们最初的透照法经验并未比传统胆囊切除术提供更好的结果。