Khatib Mohd Sibghatullah, Ameer Bilal, Ajit Mannur Nikita, Ramalingaiahsetty Amith Madi, Peerzade Sayed Mateen, Bambawale Amrut
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. Syamala Reddy Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, India.
SJM Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Apr 17;10(2):142-147. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_488_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
The objective of this article was to understand and decode the mystery of the formation of para-chloroaniline (PCA). The ingredient of the brown precipitate after mixing sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) is still in debate.
Various studies adopt a different methodology to substantiate that it may contain PCA, which is a carcinogenic agent. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the relationship between PCA and brown precipitate. Two reviewers independently conducted a comprehensive literature search. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched. In addition, the bibliographies were manually searched. There was no disagreement between the two reviewers. This review was reported and conducted in step with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Of 233 articles, only 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. Available scientific evidence was more supportive that the brown precipitate form after mixing NaOCl and CHX may form para-chloroamide moiety rather than free PCA, and PCA may be the by-product of CHX degradation.
On the basis of the current evidence and data extracted from the various databases, it can be concluded that the mixture of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine does not form PCA, and PCA may be the by-product of high concentrated chlorhexidine. Further studies are required to substantiate the evidence.
本文旨在了解并破解对氯苯胺(PCA)的形成之谜。次氯酸钠(NaOCl)与葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)混合后棕色沉淀物的成分仍存在争议。
各项研究采用不同方法来证实其可能含有PCA,而PCA是一种致癌物质。本系统评价的目的是评估PCA与棕色沉淀物之间的关系。两名评价者独立进行全面的文献检索。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane和PubMed数据库。此外,还手动检索了参考文献。两名评价者之间没有分歧。本评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行报告和实施。
在233篇文章中,只有13篇文章符合纳入标准。现有科学证据更支持次氯酸钠和葡萄糖酸氯己定混合后形成的棕色沉淀物可能形成对氯酰胺部分而非游离的PCA,且PCA可能是葡萄糖酸氯己定降解的副产物。
根据从各个数据库中提取的现有证据和数据,可以得出结论,次氯酸钠和氯己定的混合物不会形成PCA,且PCA可能是高浓度氯己定的副产物。需要进一步的研究来证实这一证据。