• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同车针龋洞预备效果的评估与比较:一项显微计算机断层扫描辅助研究

Evaluation and Comparison of Caries Excavation Efficacy of Three Different Burs: A Micro-computed Tomographic-assisted Study.

作者信息

Vusurumarthi Vinay, Ballullaya Srinidhi V, Pushpa Shankarappa, Veluvarti Venkata Ramya K, Loka Pramod R, Galla Pavan K

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saint Joseph Dental College and Hospital, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Apr 14;10(2):213-219. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_133_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_133_19
PMID:32670911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7339996/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three different caries excavation methods using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen freshly extracted human molar teeth with occlusal dentinal caries were selected. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally into two halves and were randomly divided into three groups ( = 10) depending on the caries removal technique: Group 1: tungsten carbide (TC) bur, Group 2: cerabur (CB), and Group 3: Excavus (EX) tipEX). A preoperative micro-CT scan of all the samples was taken. The caries excavation procedures were carried out followed by postoperative micro-CT scan. The preoperative and postoperative scans of each tooth were analyzed for caries removal effectiveness (CRE), mineral density (MD), and minimal invasiveness potential (MIP) using Avizo 9.4 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). Statistical analysis was conducted by applying three-way analysis of variance and independent sample -test using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, USA).

RESULTS

Among the three groups, the TC group had the smallest RC/IC (residual caries/initial caries) ratio, highest mean MD at the cavity floor, and highest MIP. The EX group significantly had the highest RC/IC, lowest mean MD, and lowest MIP. Both the CRE and MIP parameters of CB group were acceptable (RC/IC = 0.08, mean MD = 1.09g/cm, and MIP = 1.09).

CONCLUSION

As compared with the three excavation methods, CBs can be considered as an alternative to TC burs because of its MIP and complete removal of infected carious dentin.

摘要

目的与目标

本研究旨在使用微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估三种不同龋洞挖掘方法的有效性。

材料与方法

选取15颗新拔除的有咬合面牙本质龋的人类磨牙。将牙齿纵向切成两半,并根据龋洞去除技术随机分为三组(每组n = 10):第1组:碳化钨(TC)车针,第2组:cerabur(CB),第3组:Excavus(EX)尖端。对所有样本进行术前微型计算机断层扫描。进行龋洞挖掘程序,随后进行术后微型计算机断层扫描。使用Avizo 9.4软件(德国赛默飞世尔科技公司)对每颗牙齿的术前和术后扫描结果进行龋洞去除效果(CRE)、矿物质密度(MD)和最小侵入性潜力(MIP)分析。使用社会科学统计软件包20.0版(美国IBM公司)进行方差分析和独立样本t检验的统计分析。

结果

在三组中,TC组的RC/IC(残留龋/初始龋)比值最小,洞底平均MD最高,MIP最高。EX组的RC/IC显著最高,平均MD最低,MIP最低。CB组的CRE和MIP参数均可接受(RC/IC = 0.08,平均MD = 1.09g/cm³,MIP = 1.09)。

结论

与三种挖掘方法相比,由于CB的MIP以及能完全去除感染的龋坏牙本质,可被视为TC车针的一种替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/ad91ffd0b4f9/JISPCD-10-213-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/af1c1e99082e/JISPCD-10-213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/723314065852/JISPCD-10-213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/23ebac6478d0/JISPCD-10-213-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/7ead988ba76c/JISPCD-10-213-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/b749c69be553/JISPCD-10-213-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/ad91ffd0b4f9/JISPCD-10-213-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/af1c1e99082e/JISPCD-10-213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/723314065852/JISPCD-10-213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/23ebac6478d0/JISPCD-10-213-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/7ead988ba76c/JISPCD-10-213-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/b749c69be553/JISPCD-10-213-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4040/7339996/ad91ffd0b4f9/JISPCD-10-213-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and Comparison of Caries Excavation Efficacy of Three Different Burs: A Micro-computed Tomographic-assisted Study.三种不同车针龋洞预备效果的评估与比较:一项显微计算机断层扫描辅助研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Apr 14;10(2):213-219. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_133_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
2
Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.微计算机断层扫描评估荧光辅助龋齿清除术(FACE)技术:与其他三种龋齿去除技术的比较。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):461-7. doi: 10.1111/adj.12106.
3
Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.龋病去除效果和微创潜力的龋病治疗技术:微 CT 研究。
J Dent. 2011 Feb;39(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
4
Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation.不同机械方法去除牙本质龋的效果:显微CT和数字图像评估
Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):263-70. doi: 10.2341/13-278-L. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs.使用聚合物车针与传统碳化钨车针进行牙本质龋洞预备的比较。
Quintessence Int. 2007 Jul-Aug;38(7):565-9.
6
Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal.数字图像分析方法评估传统和自限制概念在牙本质龋去除中的性能。
J Dent. 2013 Aug;41 Suppl 3:e31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Polymer Bur, Cera Bur, and Tungsten Carbide Bur in Dentin Caries Excavation of Mandibular Primary Molars: An Study.聚合物车针、陶瓷车针和碳化钨车针在下颌第一乳磨牙龋洞预备效率的比较评价:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1442-S1446. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_842_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation.与传统碳化钨球钻相比,聚合物球钻SmartPrep在牙本质龋洞预备中的效率。
Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):256-60. doi: 10.2341/05-24.
9
Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth.四种乳牙牙本质洞形预备方法的性能
Caries Res. 2006;40(2):117-23. doi: 10.1159/000091057.
10
In vitro comparison of ceramic burs and conventional tungsten carbide bud burs in dentin caries excavation.陶瓷车针与传统碳化钨球头车针在牙本质龋洞预备中的体外比较
Quintessence Int. 2008 Jun;39(6):495-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Volumetric analysis after caries excavation with caries detecting dyes and chemomechanical caries removal agents using 3D scanner-a randomised clinical trial.使用 3D 扫描仪评估龋病探测染料和化学机械去龋剂去腐后的容积变化:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03907-5.
2
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Minimal Invasive Methods Versus Conventional Methods for Caries Removal in Primary Molars.乳牙龋病微创去龋方法与传统方法疗效的评估
Cureus. 2023 Dec 19;15(12):e50803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50803. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Diagnosis and Assessment of Dental Caries Using Novel Bioactive Caries Detecting Dye Solution.

本文引用的文献

1
A Century of Change towards Prevention and Minimal Intervention in Cariology.一个世纪以来龋病预防和最小干预的转变。
J Dent Res. 2019 Jun;98(6):611-617. doi: 10.1177/0022034519837252.
2
Minimal intervention dentistry for partially dentate older adults.老年人部分牙列缺损的微创牙科治疗。
Gerodontology. 2019 Jun;36(2):92-98. doi: 10.1111/ger.12389. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Minimally Invasive Approach for Improving Anterior Dental Aesthetics: Case Report with 1-Year Follow-Up.改善前牙美学的微创方法:1年随访病例报告
使用新型生物活性龋齿检测染料溶液进行龋齿的诊断与评估
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 9;11(2):500. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020500.
Case Rep Dent. 2018 Sep 6;2018:4601795. doi: 10.1155/2018/4601795. eCollection 2018.
4
Selective Removal of Carious Tissue.龋坏组织的选择性去除
Monogr Oral Sci. 2018;27:82-91. doi: 10.1159/000487838. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An Study.采用传统技术和化学机械技术去除乳牙龋坏后剩余牙本质微硬度的评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S166-S172. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_148_17.
6
Atraumatic restorative treatment and minimal intervention dentistry.非创伤性修复治疗与微创牙科
Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 11;223(3):183-189. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.664.
7
Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin.储存溶液对牙冠釉质和牙本质显微硬度的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):262-266. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156848.
8
Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.微计算机断层扫描评估荧光辅助龋齿清除术(FACE)技术:与其他三种龋齿去除技术的比较。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):461-7. doi: 10.1111/adj.12106.
9
Micro-tensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of an adhesive bonded to dentin prepared by contemporary caries-excavation techniques.当代龋损微创去腐技术处理牙本质后牙本质粘结的微拉伸粘结强度和界面特征。
Dent Mater. 2011 Jun;27(6):552-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
10
Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.龋病去除效果和微创潜力的龋病治疗技术:微 CT 研究。
J Dent. 2011 Feb;39(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 25.