• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同机械方法去除牙本质龋的效果:显微CT和数字图像评估

Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation.

作者信息

Ferraz C, Freire A R, Mendonça J S, Fernandes C A O, Cardona J C, Yamauti M

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):263-70. doi: 10.2341/13-278-L. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

DOI:10.2341/13-278-L
PMID:25575196
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasive potential (MIP) of caries excavation methods using digital imaging and microtomography analyses.

METHODS

Twelve human molars with occlusal caries lesions in dentin were randomly divided into three groups (carbide bur, exacavator, and polymer bur). They were sectioned mesiodistally, and standardized digital and computed microtomography x-ray (micro-CT) images were taken from each section before and after caries excavation. On each image, initial carious dentin (IC), prepared cavity (PC), and residual caries (RC) were defined according to visual criteria using ImageJ software. CRE was determined based on the RC/IC ratio, whereas MIP was determined by the PC/IC ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Student t-test or with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls test. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

For both digital image and micro-CT analysis, the carbide bur showed higher CRE values than the excavator (p=0.0063 and p=0.0263, respectively) and the polymer bur (p=0.0028 and p=0.0005, respectively). The latter two presented similar results (p>0.05). Regarding MIP, for the digital image analysis, the polymer bur was different from the carbide bur (p=0.0030) but was not different from that of the excavator (p=0.1240). For micro-CT analysis, the MIP values of all the groups were significantly different, and the polymer bur was the most conservative method (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The carbide bur was the most effective method for caries removal but was not completely conservative. The polymer bur and excavator presented low invasive potential but were not able to remove all of the carious dentin.

摘要

目的

通过数字成像和显微断层扫描分析,确定龋洞预备方法的龋坏组织去除效果(CRE)和微创潜能(MIP)。

方法

选取12颗有牙本质咬合面龋损的人类磨牙,随机分为三组(硬质合金车针组、挖匙组和聚合车针组)。将牙齿近远中向切开,在龋洞预备前后从每个切片获取标准化的数字图像和计算机显微断层扫描X线(显微CT)图像。在每张图像上,使用ImageJ软件根据视觉标准定义初始龋坏牙本质(IC)、预备洞形(PC)和残留龋坏(RC)。基于RC/IC比值确定CRE,而MIP由PC/IC比值确定。数据采用单因素方差分析和Student t检验,或Kruskal-Wallis和Student-Newman-Keuls检验进行分析。显著性水平设定为0.05。

结果

对于数字图像和显微CT分析,硬质合金车针组的CRE值均高于挖匙组(分别为p = 0.0063和p = 0.0263)和聚合车针组(分别为p = 0.0028和p = 0.0005)。后两组结果相似(p>0.05)。关于MIP,对于数字图像分析,聚合车针组与硬质合金车针组不同(p = 0.0030),但与挖匙组无差异(p = 0.1240)。对于显微CT分析,所有组的MIP值均有显著差异,聚合车针组是最保守的方法(p<0.05)。

结论

硬质合金车针是去除龋坏最有效的方法,但并非完全保守。聚合车针和挖匙的微创潜能较低,但不能去除所有龋坏牙本质。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation.不同机械方法去除牙本质龋的效果:显微CT和数字图像评估
Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):263-70. doi: 10.2341/13-278-L. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
2
Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.龋病去除效果和微创潜力的龋病治疗技术:微 CT 研究。
J Dent. 2011 Feb;39(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
3
Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal.数字图像分析方法评估传统和自限制概念在牙本质龋去除中的性能。
J Dent. 2013 Aug;41 Suppl 3:e31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal.用于选择性龋坏牙本质去除的聚酰胺聚合物车针的临床评价
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Jul 1;10(4):26-34.
5
Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth.四种乳牙牙本质洞形预备方法的性能
Caries Res. 2006;40(2):117-23. doi: 10.1159/000091057.
6
Evaluation and Comparison of Caries Excavation Efficacy of Three Different Burs: A Micro-computed Tomographic-assisted Study.三种不同车针龋洞预备效果的评估与比较:一项显微计算机断层扫描辅助研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Apr 14;10(2):213-219. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_133_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
7
Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.微计算机断层扫描评估荧光辅助龋齿清除术(FACE)技术:与其他三种龋齿去除技术的比较。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):461-7. doi: 10.1111/adj.12106.
8
Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation.与传统碳化钨球钻相比,聚合物球钻SmartPrep在牙本质龋洞预备中的效率。
Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):256-60. doi: 10.2341/05-24.
9
In vivo comparison of reduction in bacterial count after caries excavation with 3 different techniques.采用3种不同技术进行龋洞预备后细菌数量减少情况的体内比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2011 Jan-Apr;78(1):31-5.
10
Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography against Micro-computed Tomography for Evaluation of Remaining Coronal Dentin Thickness.光学相干断层扫描与微型计算机断层扫描用于评估剩余牙冠牙本质厚度的对比验证
J Endod. 2015 Aug;41(8):1349-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
High-intensity focused ultrasound: an innovative approach for micro-manipulation of demineralized dentine.高强度聚焦超声:一种用于脱矿牙本质微操作的创新方法。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 8;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-06008-7.
2
3-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior composite restorations lined with ion-releasing materials.3 年随机临床试验评估释放离子材料衬里的后牙复合树脂修复体的性能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55329-6.
3
Shear Bond Strength of Adhesives Placed following Selective Removal of Red-Fluorescing Carious Dentine in vitro.
体外选择性去除红色荧光龋坏牙本质后黏结剂的抗剪粘结强度。
Caries Res. 2024;58(1):17-29. doi: 10.1159/000534349. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Ultrasound device as a minimally invasive approach for caries dentin removal.超声设备作为一种微创的龋坏牙本质去除方法。
Braz Dent J. 2022 Jan-Feb;33(1):57-67. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202203878.
5
Histological determination of cariously altered collagen after dentin caries excavation with the polymer bur PolyBur P1 in comparison to a conventional bud bur.用聚合物车针 PolyBur P1 与传统球钻相比,对牙本质龋挖除后的龋变胶原进行组织学评估。
Head Face Med. 2019 Jul 15;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0205-9.
6
Incompatible amount of 3-D and 2-D periodontal attachments on micro-CT scanned premolars.在 micro-CT 扫描的前磨牙上存在 3-D 和 2-D 牙周附着物不兼容的情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 8;13(3):e0193894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193894. eCollection 2018.
7
Inconsistency in the Crown-to-Root Ratios of Single-Rooted Premolars Measured by 2D and 3D Examinations.二维和三维检查测量的单根前磨牙冠根比的不一致性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 28;7(1):16484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16612-x.