Foulkes Rachel, Man Ernest, Thind Jasmine, Yeung Suet, Joy Abigail, Hoskins Clare
School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.
Biomater Sci. 2020 Sep 7;8(17):4653-4664. doi: 10.1039/d0bm00558d. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
The use of nanomaterials in biomedicine has increased over the past 10 years, with many different nanoparticle systems being utilised within the clinical setting. With limited emerging success in clinical trials, polymeric, metallic, and lipid based nanoparticles have all found a place in medicine, with these generally providing enhanced drug efficacy or therapeutic effect compared to the standard drug treatments. Although there is great anticipation surrounding the field of nanomedicine and its influence on the pharmaceutical industry, there is currently very little regulatory guidance in this area, despite repeated calls from the research community, something that is critical to provide legal certainty to manufacturers, policymakers, healthcare providers and the general public. This is reflected in the lack of an international definition of what these materials are, with several bodies, including the National Institute of Health, USA, the European Science Foundation and the European Technology Platform, having differing definitions, and the FDA having no clear definition at all. The uncertainty created by the lack of consistency across the board may ultimately impact funding, research and development of such products negatively thus destroying public acceptance and perception of nano-products. This review aims to discuss the use of nanomaterials within the clinical setting, why regulation of these materials is so important, and the challenges faced in regulating these materials generally, as well as the current regulation used in different nations.
在过去十年中,纳米材料在生物医学中的应用有所增加,许多不同的纳米颗粒系统已在临床环境中得到应用。尽管临床试验取得的新成功有限,但基于聚合物、金属和脂质的纳米颗粒在医学领域都已占有一席之地,与标准药物治疗相比,这些纳米颗粒通常能提高药物疗效或治疗效果。尽管围绕纳米医学领域及其对制药行业的影响抱有很大期望,但尽管研究界多次呼吁,该领域目前的监管指导却非常少,而这对于为制造商、政策制定者、医疗保健提供者和公众提供法律确定性至关重要。这体现在缺乏对这些材料的国际定义上,包括美国国立卫生研究院、欧洲科学基金会和欧洲技术平台在内的多个机构有不同的定义,而美国食品药品监督管理局根本没有明确的定义。全面缺乏一致性所造成的不确定性最终可能会对这类产品的资金投入、研发产生负面影响,从而破坏公众对纳米产品的接受度和认知。本综述旨在讨论纳米材料在临床环境中的应用、对这些材料进行监管为何如此重要、监管这些材料通常面临的挑战以及不同国家目前所采用的监管措施。