Daniels K C, Ferneyhough H S
Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jul;14(3):164-71.
In a study to determine the reliability of specific direct fluorescent antibody staining of Treponema pallidum (DFATP) in lesion exudate, and to evaluate it as a potential diagnostic test to be used in lieu of or as an adjunct to the darkfield and other laboratory tests as an aid in the diagnosis of early syphilis, two types of comparisons were made: Study A-Replicate specimens from each of 350 lesions were examined in the state laboratory by DFATP and in the field by darkfield microscopy and the results were compared; Study B--95 specimens of lesion exudate were tested by the DFATP test and compared with the Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS) test on patients' sera. The tests in each study were evaluated as to sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with each other. The DFATP proved to be as reliable as the darkfield, was advantageous in some instances, and can be valuable when a darkfield examination is not feasible. Much of the responsibility of an adequate DFATP or darkfield test rests on the one who takes the specimen.
在一项旨在确定梅毒螺旋体特异性直接荧光抗体染色法(DFATP)对病变渗出液检测可靠性,并评估其作为一种潜在诊断试验以替代暗视野及其他实验室检测或作为辅助手段用于早期梅毒诊断的研究中,进行了两类比较:研究A——来自350个病变的重复标本在州立实验室采用DFATP检测,同时在现场采用暗视野显微镜检查,对结果进行比较;研究B——采用DFATP检测95份病变渗出液标本,并与患者血清的荧光螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA - ABS)结果进行比较。对每项研究中的检测在敏感性、特异性及相互一致性方面进行评估。结果表明,DFATP与暗视野检测同样可靠,在某些情况下具有优势,且在无法进行暗视野检查时可能很有价值。DFATP或暗视野检测是否充分很大程度上取决于采集标本的人员。