数字鸿沟对在线医疗保健和社会福利服务感知益处的影响:全国横断面调查研究。
Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
机构信息
Finnish Institution for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
出版信息
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17616. doi: 10.2196/17616.
BACKGROUND
The number of online services in health care is increasing rapidly in developed countries. Users are expected to take a more skilled and active role in taking care of their health and prevention of ill health. This induces risks that users (especially those who need the services the most) will drop out of digital services, resulting in a digital divide or exclusion. To ensure wide and equal use of online services, all users must experience them as beneficial.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine associations of (1) demographics (age, gender, and degree of urbanization), (2) self-rated health, (3) socioeconomic position (education, experienced financial hardship, labor market position, and living alone), (4) social participation (voting, satisfaction with relationships, and keeping in touch with friends and family members), and (5) access, skills, and extent of use of information and communication technologies (ICT) with perceived benefits of online health care and social welfare services. Associations were examined separately for perceived health, economic, and collaboration benefits.
METHODS
We used a large random sample representative of the Finnish population including 4495 (56.77% women) respondents aged between 20 and 97 years. Analyses of covariance were used to examine the associations of independent variables with perceived benefits.
RESULTS
Access to online services, ICT skills, and extent of use were associated with all examined benefits of online services. ICT skills seemed to be the most important factor. Poor self-rated health was also consistently associated with lower levels of perceived benefits. Similarly, those who were keeping in touch with their friends and relatives at least once a week perceived online services more often beneficial in all the examined dimensions. Those who had experienced financial hardship perceived fewer health and economic benefits than others. Those who were satisfied with their relationships reported higher levels of health and collaboration benefits compared with their counterparts. Also age, education, and degree of urbanization had some statistically significant associations with benefits but they seemed to be at least partly explained by differences in access, skills, and extent of use of online services.
CONCLUSIONS
According to our results, providing health care services online has the potential to reinforce existing social and health inequalities. Our findings suggest that access to online services, skills to use them, and extent of use play crucial roles in perceiving them as beneficial. Moreover, there is a risk of digital exclusion among those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, in poor health, or socially isolated. In times when health and social services are increasingly offered online, this digital divide may predispose people with high needs for services to exclusion from them.
背景
在发达国家,医疗保健领域的在线服务数量正在迅速增加。人们期望在照顾自己的健康和预防健康不良方面发挥更熟练和积极的作用。这带来了用户(尤其是最需要这些服务的用户)退出数字服务的风险,从而导致数字鸿沟或排斥现象。为了确保广泛和平等地使用在线服务,所有用户都必须认为这些服务是有益的。
目的
本研究旨在探讨(1)人口统计学特征(年龄、性别和城市化程度)、(2)自我评估健康状况、(3)社会经济地位(教育、经历经济困难、劳动力市场地位和独居)、(4)社会参与(投票、对人际关系的满意度以及与朋友和家人保持联系)以及(5)信息和通信技术(ICT)的获取、技能和使用程度与在线医疗保健和社会福利服务的感知益处之间的关联。分别检查了感知健康、经济和协作益处的关联。
方法
我们使用了一个代表芬兰人口的大型随机样本,其中包括 4495 名(56.77%为女性)年龄在 20 至 97 岁之间的受访者。使用协方差分析来检查自变量与感知益处之间的关联。
结果
在线服务的访问、ICT 技能和使用程度与所有检查到的在线服务益处相关。ICT 技能似乎是最重要的因素。自我评估健康状况较差也与感知益处水平较低始终相关。同样,那些每周至少与朋友和亲戚保持一次联系的人在所有检查维度中都更经常认为在线服务有益。经历过经济困难的人比其他人感知到的健康和经济益处更少。与他们的同龄人相比,对人际关系满意的人报告的健康和协作益处水平更高。同样,年龄、教育程度和城市化程度与益处也有一些具有统计学意义的关联,但它们似乎至少部分归因于在线服务的获取、技能和使用程度的差异。
结论
根据我们的结果,在线提供医疗保健服务有可能加剧现有的社会和健康不平等。我们的研究结果表明,在线服务的访问、使用技能和使用程度在感知其有益性方面起着至关重要的作用。此外,在社会经济处于不利地位、健康状况不佳或社会孤立的人群中,存在数字排斥的风险。在健康和社会服务越来越多地在线提供的时代,这种数字鸿沟可能使那些对服务有高需求的人被排斥在服务之外。
相似文献
J Med Internet Res. 2016-11-22
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-6-23
引用本文的文献
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025-1-8
本文引用的文献
J Med Internet Res. 2019-3-5
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016-1-23