• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会健康不平等与电子健康:一项对理论和实证研究进行定性综合的文献综述

Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies.

作者信息

Latulippe Karine, Hamel Christine, Giroux Dominique

机构信息

Department of Studies of Teaching and Learning, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.

Faculté de médecine, Département de réadaptation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.6731
PMID:28450271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5427250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth is developing rapidly and brings with it a promise to reduce social health inequalities (SHIs). Yet, it appears that it also has the potential to increase them.

OBJECTIVES

The general objective of this review was to set out how to ensure that eHealth contributes to reducing SHIs rather than exacerbating them. This review has three objectives: (1) identifying characteristics of people at risk of experiencing social inequality in health; (2) determining the possibilities of developing eHealth tools that avoid increasing SHI; and (3) modeling the process of using an eHealth tool by people vulnerable to SHI.

METHODS

Following the EPPI approach (Evidence for Policy and Practice of Information of the Institute of Education at the University of London), two databases were searched for the terms SHIs and eHealth and their derivatives in titles and abstracts. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed articles were included and evaluated. The software NVivo (QSR International) was employed to extract the data and allow for a metasynthesis of the data.

RESULTS

Of the 73 articles retained, 10 were theoretical, 7 were from reviews, and 56 were based on empirical studies. Of the latter, 40 used a quantitative approach, 8 used a qualitative approach, 4 used mixed methods approach, and only 4 were based on participatory research-action approach. The digital divide in eHealth is a serious barrier and contributes greatly to SHI. Ethnicity and low income are the most commonly used characteristics to identify people at risk of SHI. The most promising actions for reducing SHI via eHealth are to aim for universal access to the tool of eHealth, become aware of users' literacy level, create eHealth tools that respect the cultural attributes of future users, and encourage the participation of people at risk of SHI.

CONCLUSIONS

eHealth has the potential to widen the gulf between those at risk of SHI and the rest of the population. The widespread expansion of eHealth technologies calls for rigorous consideration of interventions, which are not likely to exacerbate SHI.

摘要

背景

电子健康正在迅速发展,并带来了减少社会健康不平等现象(SHIs)的希望。然而,它似乎也有可能加剧这些不平等。

目的

本综述的总体目标是阐述如何确保电子健康有助于减少而非加剧社会健康不平等现象。本综述有三个目标:(1)识别有健康方面社会不平等风险的人群特征;(2)确定开发避免加剧社会健康不平等的电子健康工具的可能性;(3)模拟易受社会健康不平等影响的人群使用电子健康工具的过程。

方法

按照伦敦大学教育学院政策与实践信息证据(EPPI)方法,在两个数据库中搜索标题和摘要中包含社会健康不平等现象(SHIs)、电子健康及其衍生词的文献。纳入并评估定性、定量和混合研究文章。使用NVivo软件(QSR国际公司)提取数据并进行数据的元综合分析。

结果

在保留的73篇文章中,10篇是理论性的,7篇来自综述,56篇基于实证研究。在后者中,40篇采用定量方法,8篇采用定性方法,4篇采用混合方法,只有4篇基于参与式研究 - 行动方法。电子健康中的数字鸿沟是一个严重障碍,对社会健康不平等有很大影响。种族和低收入是识别有社会健康不平等风险人群最常用的特征。通过电子健康减少社会健康不平等最有前景的行动是致力于实现电子健康工具的普遍可及性,了解用户的识字水平,创建尊重未来用户文化属性的电子健康工具,并鼓励易受社会健康不平等影响的人群参与。

结论

电子健康有可能扩大易受社会健康不平等影响的人群与其他人群之间的差距。电子健康技术的广泛普及需要对干预措施进行严格考量,这些干预措施不应加剧社会健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/5427250/18d1466cff9e/jmir_v19i4e136_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/5427250/f64afbf183d1/jmir_v19i4e136_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/5427250/18d1466cff9e/jmir_v19i4e136_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/5427250/f64afbf183d1/jmir_v19i4e136_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/5427250/18d1466cff9e/jmir_v19i4e136_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies.社会健康不平等与电子健康:一项对理论和实证研究进行定性综合的文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731.
2
Co-Design to Support the Development of Inclusive eHealth Tools for Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design.共同设计以支持为功能依赖老年人的护理人员开发包容性的电子健康工具:社会正义设计。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 9;22(11):e18399. doi: 10.2196/18399.
3
eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information.电子健康素养:将数字鸿沟扩展至健康信息领域。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 27;14(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1619.
4
Integration of Conversion Factors for the Development of an Inclusive eHealth Tool With Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design.整合转换因子以开发一个面向功能依赖老年人照顾者的包容性电子健康工具:社会正义设计
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Aug 26;7(3):e18120. doi: 10.2196/18120.
5
Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies.倾听社区声音:对弱势母亲和孕妇参与数字健康技术情况的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 5;19(7):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7736.
6
Evaluating the effect of income support policies on social health inequalities (SHIs) at birth in Montreal and Brussels using a contextualised comparative approach and model family method: a study protocol.采用情境化比较方法和模型家庭方法评估蒙特利尔和布鲁塞尔的收入支持政策对出生时社会健康不平等(SHIs)的影响:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e024015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024015.
7
Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature.电子健康时代的健康素养:文献系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
8
Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: eHealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide.理解战略健康营销中的健康素养:电子健康素养、健康差异与数字鸿沟。
Health Mark Q. 2008;25(1-2):175-203. doi: 10.1080/07359680802126301.
9
Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups.运用电子健康素养视角:针对社会弱势群体的电子健康干预措施的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e18476. doi: 10.2196/18476.
10
Navigating the digital divide: A systematic review of eHealth literacy in underserved populations in the United States.跨越数字鸿沟:对美国服务不足人群的电子健康素养的系统评价
Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2014.948171. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Telephone vs Text Message Counseling and Physical Activity Among Midlife and Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.中年及老年人群中人工电话咨询与短信咨询及身体活动的比较:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2528858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28858.
2
Best practices for home nutritional management in postoperative gastric cancer patients: an evidence summary.胃癌术后患者家庭营养管理的最佳实践:证据总结
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14608-9.
3
Digital Health Literacy in Patients With Common Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying Human Factors Principles to Mitigate Usability Issues Related to Embedded Assumptions in Health Information Technology Design.应用人因学原理减轻与健康信息技术设计中嵌入式假设相关的可用性问题。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2014 Dec 18;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3524.
2
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
3
常见慢性病患者的数字健康素养:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 25;27:e56231. doi: 10.2196/56231.
4
Facilitators and barriers for use of digital technology in chronic disease management.慢性病管理中使用数字技术的促进因素和障碍
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 10;15(1):29267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15549-w.
5
How digital health literacy shapes health: Mediating role of physical activity and heterogeneity in China.数字健康素养如何塑造健康:身体活动在中国的中介作用及异质性
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 15;20(7):e0328101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328101. eCollection 2025.
6
Use of Technology to Support Health Care Providers Delivering Care in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Umbrella Review.利用技术支持低收入和中低收入国家的医疗保健提供者提供护理:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 18;27:e66288. doi: 10.2196/66288.
7
Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Determinants for the Usage of Digital Patient Portals in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Digital Divide.医院数字患者门户网站使用情况的社会人口学和社会经济决定因素:关于数字鸿沟的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e68091. doi: 10.2196/68091.
8
25 Years of Digital Health Toward Universal Health Coverage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家实现全民健康覆盖的25年数字健康:快速系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 29;27:e59042. doi: 10.2196/59042.
9
Protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of digital health solutions in supporting adult cancer survivorship care.评估数字健康解决方案在支持成人癌症幸存者护理方面疗效的系统评价的伞形综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0322100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322100. eCollection 2025.
10
Weight management and its educational differences among retired individuals living with obesity-a salutogenic approach.肥胖退休人群的体重管理及其教育差异——一种健康生成方法
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):1892. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23072-w.
Digital communication between clinician and patient and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review in general practice.
临床医生与患者之间的数字通信及其对边缘化群体的影响:全科医学的现实主义综述
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e813-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687853.
4
Participatory design of ehealth solutions for women from vulnerable populations with perinatal depression.针对患有围产期抑郁症的弱势群体妇女的电子健康解决方案的参与式设计。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):105-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv109. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
A Study of the Demographics of Web-Based Health-Related Social Media Users.基于网络的健康相关社交媒体用户的人口统计学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 6;17(8):e194. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4308.
6
Increasing Knowledge and Health Literacy about Preterm Births in Underserved Communities: An Approach to Decrease Health Disparities, a Pilot Study.提高服务不足社区对早产的认知和健康素养:减少健康差距的方法,一项试点研究。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 May 17;8(1):83-9. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p83.
7
Where Do U.S. Adults Who Do Not Use the Internet Get Health Information? Examining Digital Health Information Disparities From 2008 to 2013.不使用互联网的美国成年人从何处获取健康信息?审视2008年至2013年的数字健康信息差异。
J Health Commun. 2016;21(1):118-24. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058444. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Information and Communication Technology Use Among Low-Income Pregnant and Postpartum Women by Race and Ethnicity: A Cross-Sectional Study.不同种族和族裔低收入孕妇及产后妇女的信息通信技术使用情况:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 3;17(7):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3916.
9
Who Follows eHealth Interventions as Recommended? A Study of Participants' Personal Characteristics From the Experimental Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial.谁会按照建议采用电子健康干预措施?一项对随机对照试验实验组参与者个人特征的研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 11;17(5):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3932.
10
Sociodemographic and health-(care-)related characteristics of online health information seekers: a cross-sectional German study.在线健康信息搜索者的社会人口学特征及与医疗保健相关的特征:一项德国横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 29;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1423-0.