• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕金森病患者基于证据的决策辅助工具:访谈研究、在线调查及两项随机对照试验方案

Evidence-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Parkinson Disease: Protocol for Interview Study, Online Survey, and Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Bientzle Martina, Kimmerle Joachim, Eggeling Marie, Cebi Idil, Weiss Daniel, Gharabaghi Alireza

机构信息

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 14;9(7):e17482. doi: 10.2196/17482.

DOI:10.2196/17482
PMID:32673261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7388050/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making is particularly important in situations with different treatment alternatives. For the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson disease, both pharmacological and surgical approaches can be applied.

OBJECTIVE

In this research project, a series of studies will be conducted to investigate how decision aids for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease should be designed in order to support the decision-making process.

METHODS

In Study 1a, qualitative interviews will be conducted to determine which needs frequently occur for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease. In Study 1b, the identified needs will then be rated for personal relevance by an independent group of patients in an online survey. In Study 2, a randomized controlled trial will be used to pretest different decision aids in a sample group of people who do not have a medical background and who do not have Parkinson disease. In Study 3, a randomized controlled trial will be used to investigate the effect of the decision aids that had been evaluated as positive in Study 2 with patients who have idiopathic Parkinson disease.

RESULTS

This series of studies received ethical approval in January 2020. As of June 2020, data collection for Study 1a has started, and it is estimated that Studies 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 will take approximately 4, 4, 6, and 6 months to complete, respectively. It is planned to present the results and analyses at international conferences and to submit the results to peer-reviewed journals for publication, once the studies have been completed. The findings will also be shared with clinicians and patients through presentations at information events.

CONCLUSIONS

This series of studies is intended to result in an evidence-based decision aid for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease in order to support the informed and reflected shared decision-making process. We further intend to contribute to a deeper understanding of the individual preferences of patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease and the impact of those preferences on treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

在存在不同治疗方案的情况下,共同决策尤为重要。对于特发性帕金森病的治疗,药理学方法和手术方法均可应用。

目的

在本研究项目中,将开展一系列研究,以调查应如何设计特发性帕金森病患者的决策辅助工具,以支持决策过程。

方法

在研究1a中,将进行定性访谈,以确定特发性帕金森病患者经常出现的需求。在研究1b中,一组独立的患者将通过在线调查对已确定的需求的个人相关性进行评分。在研究2中,将采用随机对照试验,在一组没有医学背景且没有帕金森病的人群中对不同的决策辅助工具进行预测试。在研究3中,将采用随机对照试验,调查在研究2中被评估为有效的决策辅助工具对特发性帕金森病患者的效果。

结果

这一系列研究于2020年1月获得伦理批准。截至2020年6月,研究1a的数据收集工作已经开始,预计研究1a、1b、2和3分别需要约4、4、6和6个月完成。计划在国际会议上展示研究结果和分析,并在研究完成后将结果提交给同行评审期刊发表。研究结果还将通过在信息活动中的报告与临床医生和患者分享。

结论

这一系列研究旨在为特发性帕金森病患者提供基于证据的决策辅助工具,以支持明智且经过深思熟虑的共同决策过程。我们还打算更深入地了解特发性帕金森病患者的个人偏好以及这些偏好对治疗决策的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/c976208e36dc/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/76c197112043/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/5d26bfd69f0d/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/c976208e36dc/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/76c197112043/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/5d26bfd69f0d/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc87/7388050/c976208e36dc/resprot_v9i7e17482_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Parkinson Disease: Protocol for Interview Study, Online Survey, and Two Randomized Controlled Trials.帕金森病患者基于证据的决策辅助工具:访谈研究、在线调查及两项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 14;9(7):e17482. doi: 10.2196/17482.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options for Sickle Cell Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的镰状细胞病治疗方案患者决策辅助工具的比较效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 4;21(12):e14462. doi: 10.2196/14462.
9
Effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for patients with generalised anxiety disorder: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于网络的广泛性焦虑症患者决策辅助工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e039956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039956.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of patient narratives on medical students' perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial.患者叙述对医学生共享决策认知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1886642. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1886642.
2
Observing Inter-Professional Videos: Impact of Collaboration Between Physicians and Psychologists on Attitude and Knowledge Acquisition.观看跨专业视频:医生与心理学家之间的合作对态度和知识获取的影响。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Sep 30;7:2382120520957648. doi: 10.1177/2382120520957648. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Visualization Format and Navigational Options on Laypeople's Perception and Preference of Surgery Information Videos: Randomized Controlled Trial and Online Survey.可视化格式和导航选项对非专业人士对外科手术信息视频的认知及偏好的影响:随机对照试验与在线调查
J Particip Med. 2018 Nov 22;10(4):e12338. doi: 10.2196/12338.
2
Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis.制定共享决策的方案理论:一个现实主义综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4649-1.
3
The impact of physicians' recommendations on treatment preference and attitudes: a randomized controlled experiment on shared decision-making.
医生建议对治疗偏好和态度的影响:一项关于共享决策的随机对照试验。
Psychol Health Med. 2020 Mar;25(3):259-269. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1687917. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Patient Comprehension of Common Orthopedic Terminology.患者对常见骨科术语的理解。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Aug 8;3(3):e187-e193. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190624-04. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.遭遇患者决策辅助工具的影响和效用:系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):817-841. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Shared decision making and experiences of patients with long-term conditions: has anything changed?慢性病患者的共同决策与经历:有什么变化吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 10;18(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3575-y.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
8
Effect of a decision aid with patient narratives in reducing decisional conflict in choice for surgery among early-stage breast cancer patients: A three-arm randomized controlled trial.一项采用患者叙述的决策辅助工具对早期乳腺癌患者手术选择中决策冲突的影响:一项三臂随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):550-562. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Underutilization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease? A survey on possible clinical reasons.帕金森病深部脑刺激疗法的利用不足?关于可能临床原因的一项调查。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 May;159(5):771-778. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3122-3. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Involving Patients in Weighting Benefits and Harms of Treatment in Parkinson's Disease.让患者参与权衡帕金森病治疗的利弊
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 30;11(8):e0160771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160771. eCollection 2016.