Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):2779-2785. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
Recent evidence has demonstrated that formal physical therapy (PT) may not be required for most patients undergoing total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. This study compared the differences in costs and functional outcomes in patients receiving formal PT and those who did not follow primary THA and TKA.
We queried claims data from a single private insurer identifying patients who underwent primary THA or TKA from 2015 to 2017 in our practice. Demographics, comorbidities, number, and cost of PT visits in a 90-day episode of care were recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients using self-directed home exercises, home PT, outpatient PT, or both home and outpatient PT. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of outcomes.
Of the 2971 patients included in analysis, patients using both services had higher 90-day PT costs (mean $2091, P < .001) than those using home PT alone ($1146), outpatient PT alone ($1356), or no formal PT ($0). Home PT had the greatest cost per visit for both private insurance patients ($177/visit) and Medicare Advantage patients ($157/visit), but patients using both home PT and outpatient PT services had the greatest overall PT cost, $2091 for private insurance and $1891 for Medicare Advantage. Patients who used home PT were at significantly higher risk of both complications (odds ratio = 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-4.9; P < .001) and readmissions (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.5; P < .001).
Participation in formal PT accounts for up to 8% of the episode of care following THA and TKA. The role of formal PT for most patients should take into account the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
最近的证据表明,对于大多数接受全髋关节置换术(THA)和膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者,可能不需要进行正式的物理治疗(PT)。本研究比较了接受正式 PT 治疗和未接受主要 THA 和 TKA 治疗的患者在成本和功能结果方面的差异。
我们从一家私人保险公司的索赔数据中查询了 2015 年至 2017 年在我们诊所接受初次 THA 或 TKA 的患者数据。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、90 天治疗期间的 PT 就诊次数和费用。比较了使用自我指导家庭锻炼、家庭 PT、门诊 PT 或家庭和门诊 PT 联合使用的患者的结果。采用多元分析确定结果的显著预测因素。
在纳入分析的 2971 名患者中,使用两种服务的患者 90 天 PT 费用较高(平均 2091 美元,P <.001),高于仅使用家庭 PT(1146 美元)、仅门诊 PT(1356 美元)或无正式 PT(0 美元)的患者。家庭 PT 对私人保险患者(每次就诊 177 美元)和医疗保险优势计划患者(每次就诊 157 美元)的单次就诊费用最高,但使用家庭 PT 和门诊 PT 服务的患者的总体 PT 费用最高,私人保险患者为 2091 美元,医疗保险优势计划患者为 1891 美元。使用家庭 PT 的患者发生并发症的风险显著增加(优势比 3.21;95%置信区间,2.1-4.9;P <.001)和再次入院的风险也显著增加(优势比 3.4;95%置信区间,2.1-5.5;P <.001)。
接受正式 PT 治疗占 THA 和 TKA 治疗后治疗期的 8%。对于大多数患者,正式 PT 的作用应考虑到干预的成本效益。