Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):377-383. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003128.
To investigate the safety and effectiveness of early enteral feeding versus traditional enteral feeding after gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis in children in the pediatric literature.
Prolonged postoperative fasting has been the traditional model of care following pediatric GI surgery. In contrast, early feeding has become well established in the adult population, where meta-analyses have shown early introduction of enteral feeds to be beneficial to hospital stay and patient outcomes.
Comprehensive literature searches of the English literature search (PubMed, Ovid, Embase databases) from inception to present according to the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies were assessed according to the MINORS criteria. Outcomes for time to first feed and full feeds, and discharge, and risk of major complications were synthesized.
Ten studies comprising 451 patients were included in the analysis. All studies aimed at investigating the safety of early feeding in pediatric GI surgery, with or without a fast-track program. Only 4 studies compared the study group to a control group in which patients were fed in a traditional way (traditional feeding).Most studies defined early feeding as feeds commenced ≤24 hours postoperatively (range 2-72 hours). Mean time to first feed was significantly lower in the early feeding group, but not significantly lower for the mean time to full feeds and mean hospital stay. Bowel obstruction and anastomotic breakdown were classed as major complications. There was no significant difference in their occurrence in both groups.
Although the studies identified are few and heterogeneous, they demonstrate that there is no clear advantage of keeping children "nil by mouth" and no clear disadvantage of providing early enteral nutrition following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Larger randomized controlled trials are required to assess the true impact on postoperative complications, health care associated costs, and to investigate patient-reported outcome measures.
在儿科文献中调查胃肠道(GI)吻合术后早期肠内喂养与传统肠内喂养相比的安全性和有效性。
术后长时间禁食一直是小儿胃肠手术后的传统护理模式。相比之下,早期喂养在成人中已经得到广泛应用,荟萃分析表明,早期引入肠内喂养对住院时间和患者结局有益。
根据 PRISMA 指南,全面检索英文文献(PubMed、Ovid、Embase 数据库),检索时间从建库至今。根据 MINORS 标准评估纳入的研究。综合分析首次喂养和全喂养时间、出院时间以及主要并发症风险的结果。
纳入分析的 10 项研究共纳入 451 例患者。所有研究均旨在调查小儿胃肠手术中早期喂养的安全性,无论是否有快速康复程序。只有 4 项研究将研究组与以传统方式喂养的对照组(传统喂养组)进行了比较。大多数研究将早期喂养定义为术后≤24 小时开始喂养(范围 2-72 小时)。早期喂养组首次喂养的平均时间显著降低,但全喂养和平均住院时间的平均时间无显著降低。肠阻塞和吻合口破裂被归类为主要并发症。两组的发生率无显著差异。
尽管已确定的研究数量较少且存在异质性,但它们表明,让儿童“禁食”并没有明显的优势,也没有明显的劣势提供早期肠内营养后选择性胃肠道手术。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来评估对术后并发症、医疗保健相关成本的真正影响,并调查患者报告的结果测量。