Department of Physical Therapy, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City.
School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Dec;43(4):299-309. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000427.
Achieving a sufficient level of functional ambulation remains to be a challenge to most stroke survivors. Different modes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been applied for improving various aspects of walking and mobility following stroke. However, systematic reviews before 2017 provided only general effects of tDCS on limited walking outcomes. Therefore, the aims of this study were to update the evidence of tDCS for improving walking and mobility after stroke with emphasis on individual outcomes and to delineate the effects of different modes of tDCS in subgroup analysis. The systematic search of PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published up to January 2019 identified 14 eligible reports. The PEDro scale indicated a good methodological quality of the included studies (score 6.8). The meta-analysis of primary outcomes revealed that active tDCS had no better effect than sham on walking speed [n = 7, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.189, P = 0.252] and 6-minute walking distance (n = 3, SMD = 0.209, P = 0.453). Among the secondary outcomes, significant positive effects were found on functional ambulation category (FAC) (n = 5, SMD = 0.542, P = 0.008), Rivermead Mobility Index (n = 3, SMD = 0.699, P = 0.008), and timed up and go test (TUG) (n = 5, SMD = 0.676, P = 0.001), whereas non-significant positive effects were found on Tinetti test (n = 3, SMD = 0.441, P = 0.062) and Berg Balance Scale (n = 2, SMD = 0.408, P = 0.177). In subgroup analyses, anodal tDCS had significant positive effects on FAC (n = 4, SMD = 0.611, P = 0.005) and dual-hemispheric tDCS on TUG (n = 2, SMD = 1.090, P = 0.000). The results provide up-to-date evidence of variable effects of tDCS on walking and functional mobility after stroke.
对于大多数中风幸存者来说,实现足够水平的功能性步行仍然是一项挑战。不同模式的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被应用于改善中风后行走和移动能力的各个方面。然而,2017 年之前的系统评价仅提供了 tDCS 对有限行走结果的一般影响。因此,本研究的目的是更新 tDCS 改善中风后行走和移动能力的证据,重点是个体结果,并在亚组分析中描述不同模式的 tDCS 的影响。对截至 2019 年 1 月发表的研究进行了 PubMed、Medline、PEDro、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库的系统搜索,共确定了 14 项合格报告。PEDro 量表表明纳入研究的方法学质量较好(评分 6.8)。主要结局的荟萃分析显示,与假刺激相比,主动 tDCS 对行走速度没有更好的影响[n = 7,标准化均数差(SMD)= 0.189,P = 0.252]和 6 分钟步行距离(n = 3,SMD = 0.209,P = 0.453)。在次要结局中,在功能性步行类别(FAC)(n = 5,SMD = 0.542,P = 0.008)、Rivermead 移动指数(n = 3,SMD = 0.699,P = 0.008)和计时起立行走测试(TUG)(n = 5,SMD = 0.676,P = 0.001)中发现了显著的阳性效果,而在 Tinetti 测试(n = 3,SMD = 0.441,P = 0.062)和 Berg 平衡量表(n = 2,SMD = 0.408,P = 0.177)中发现了非显著的阳性效果。在亚组分析中,阳极 tDCS 对 FAC 有显著的阳性影响(n = 4,SMD = 0.611,P = 0.005),而双半球 tDCS 对 TUG 有显著的阳性影响(n = 2,SMD = 1.090,P = 0.000)。结果提供了 tDCS 对中风后行走和功能移动性的影响的最新证据。