Department of Sport Science, Bielefeld University, 33 501, Bielefeld, Germany.
Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Aug 3;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and analyze the available evidence of non-invasive brain stimulation/spinal cord stimulation on gait, balance and/or lower limb motor recovery in stroke patients.
The PubMed database was searched from its inception through to 31/03/2021 for randomized controlled trials investigating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial/trans-spinal direct current/alternating current stimulation for improving gait, balance and/or lower limb motor function in stroke patients.
Overall, 25 appropriate studies (including 657 stroke subjects) were found. The data indicates that non-invasive brain stimulation/spinal cord stimulation is effective in supporting recovery. However, the effects are inhomogeneous across studies: (1) transcranial/trans-spinal direct current/alternating current stimulation induce greater effects than repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and (2) bilateral application of non-invasive brain stimulation is superior to unilateral stimulation.
The current evidence encourages further research and suggests that more individualized approaches are necessary for increasing effect sizes in stroke patients.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在总结和分析现有的关于非侵入性脑刺激/脊髓刺激对脑卒中患者步态、平衡和/或下肢运动功能恢复的影响的证据。
从 PubMed 数据库的建立到 2021 年 3 月 31 日,检索了关于重复经颅磁刺激或经颅/经脊髓直流电/交流电刺激改善脑卒中患者步态、平衡和/或下肢运动功能的随机对照试验。
共发现 25 项合适的研究(包括 657 名脑卒中患者)。数据表明,非侵入性脑刺激/脊髓刺激在支持康复方面是有效的。然而,研究结果存在异质性:(1)经颅/经脊髓直流电/交流电刺激比重复经颅磁刺激产生更大的效果,(2)非侵入性脑刺激的双侧应用优于单侧刺激。
目前的证据鼓励进一步研究,并表明对于增加脑卒中患者的效果大小,需要采取更个体化的方法。