Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Adult Cardiology, Manila Doctors Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;76(4):461-471. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000871.
Increased uric acid levels have been known to be associated with different cardiovascular and renal diseases. Over the past few years, several studies have examined the role of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in hypertension and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and suggest a potential role of elevated serum uric acid as an independent cardiovascular risk factor. This meta-analysis was done to determine the association of 2 ULTs commonly used in clinical practice (febuxostat vs. allopurinol) on hypertension and MACE and resolve the conflicting results of the outcomes of earlier studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing febuxostat versus allopurinol published with outcomes on blood pressure, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke were searched through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. A total of 10 studies were subsequently included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of the mean differences (MD) were done for the outcomes on blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and risk ratios (RRs) for the outcomes on MACE with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pooled analysis of studies on hyperuricemic patients showed that febuxostat 40 mg has no significant difference compared with allopurinol 100/300 mg with respect to diastolic (MD, -0.56 with 95% CI of -4.28 to 3.15) and systolic blood pressure (MD, 0.30 with 95% CI of -3.33 to 3.93). No significant differences were also noted on all-cause mortality (RR, 1.18 with 95% CI of 0.99-1.41), MI (RR, 0.92 with 95% CI of 0.72-1.18), and stroke (RR, 1.05 with 95% CI of 0.77-1.43). The results of this meta-analysis showed that the 2 ULTs (febuxostat vs. allopurinol) have no significant association with respect to blood pressure among adult patients with hyperuricemia. No significant association was also noted of either ULT with all-cause mortality, MI, and stroke.
尿酸水平升高与心血管和肾脏疾病有关。在过去的几年中,有几项研究检查了尿酸降低疗法(ULT)在高血压和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)中的作用,并提出了血清尿酸升高作为独立心血管危险因素的潜在作用。进行这项荟萃分析是为了确定在高血压和 MACE 中两种在临床实践中常用的 ULT(非布司他与别嘌醇)之间的关联,并解决早期研究结果的冲突。通过 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane 数据库搜索比较非布司他与别嘌醇治疗高尿酸血症的随机对照试验,发表的结局包括血压、全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和中风。随后共有 10 项研究纳入荟萃分析。对血压(收缩压和舒张压)的结局进行平均差(MD)的汇总分析,对 MACE 的结局进行风险比(RR)的汇总分析,并附有相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。对高尿酸血症患者的研究进行汇总分析显示,非布司他 40mg 与别嘌醇 100/300mg 相比,在舒张压(MD,-0.56,95%CI-4.28 至 3.15)和收缩压(MD,0.30,95%CI-3.33 至 3.93)方面无显著差异。全因死亡率(RR,1.18,95%CI 0.99-1.41)、心肌梗死(RR,0.92,95%CI 0.72-1.18)和中风(RR,1.05,95%CI 0.77-1.43)也无显著差异。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,在患有高尿酸血症的成年患者中,这两种 ULT(非布司他与别嘌醇)在血压方面没有显著关联。也没有注意到任何一种 ULT 与全因死亡率、心肌梗死和中风有显著关联。