Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Atrium Health Weight Management, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3865-3873. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07800-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Failed fundoplication is a difficult reoperative challenge, with limited evidence differentiating outcomes of a redo fundoplication versus conversion to Roux-en-Y anatomy with a gastric diversion (RYGD). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these reoperative strategies on symptom resolution.
A retrospective single institution study of patients with failed fundoplications undergoing conversion to RYGD or redo fundoplication between 2006 and 2019 was conducted. Patient characteristics, preoperative evaluation, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
180 patients with symptomatic, failed fundoplications were identified: 101 patients (56.1%) underwent conversion to RYGD, and 79 patients (43.9%) underwent redo fundoplication. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher for the patients undergoing RYGD with mean BMI of 34.3 ± 6.9 vs 27.7 ± 3.9 kg/m (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing conversion to RYGD were also more comorbid than their counterparts, with higher rates of obstructive sleep apnea (17.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.01), but similar rates of hypertension (54.5% vs 44.3%, p = 0.18, asthma/COPD (25.7% vs 16.5%, p = 0.13), diabetes (10.9% vs 10.1%, p = 0.87), and hyperlipidemia (29.7% vs 36.7%, p = 0.32). Mean operative times were significantly higher for the RYGD (359.6 ± 90.4 vs 238.8 ± 75.6 min, p < 0.0001), as was mean estimated blood loss (168.8 ± 207.5 vs 81.0 ± 145.4, p < 0.0001). Conversion rates from minimally invasive to open were similar (10.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.92). The incidence of recurrent reflux symptoms was not significantly different (p = 0.46) between RYGD (16.8%) and redo fundoplication (12.8%), at an average follow-up of 50.6 ± 140.7 vs 34.7 ± 39.2 months, (p = 0.03). For the RYGD cohort, patients also had resolution of other comorbidities including obesity 35.6%, OSA 16.7%, hyperlipidemia 10.0%, hypertension 9.1%, and diabetes 9.1%. On average, patients decreased their BMI by 6.8 ± 5.5 kg/m and lost 69.6% of their excess body weight. Mean length of stay was higher in patients undergoing RYGD (5.3 ± 7.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.9 days, p = 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar (9.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.12). The reoperation rate was higher in the RYGD cohort (17.8% vs 2.5%, p = 0.001).
RYBG and redo fundoplication are equivalent in terms of resolution of reflux. RYGD resulted in significant loss of excess body weight.
胃食管反流病(GERD)手术失败后再次手术极具挑战性,目前仅有少量证据可以区分再次行抗反流手术(如胃底折叠术)和改行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)的效果。本研究旨在确定这些手术策略对症状缓解的影响。
对 2006 年至 2019 年间在我院行手术治疗失败的胃底折叠术患者进行回顾性单中心研究。记录并分析患者的一般特征、术前评估、手术发现和术后结果。
共确定了 180 例有症状的胃底折叠术失败患者:101 例(56.1%)患者改行 RYGB,79 例(43.9%)患者行再次胃底折叠术。RYGB 组患者的 BMI 显著高于再次胃底折叠术组(平均 BMI 分别为 34.3 ± 6.9kg/m² 和 27.7 ± 3.9kg/m²,p<0.001)。与再次胃底折叠术组相比,RYGB 组患者的合并症更多,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的发生率更高(17.8%比 5.1%,p=0.01),但高血压(54.5%比 44.3%,p=0.18)、哮喘/COPD(25.7%比 16.5%,p=0.13)、糖尿病(10.9%比 10.1%,p=0.87)和高脂血症(29.7%比 36.7%,p=0.32)的发生率无显著差异。RYGB 组的平均手术时间显著长于再次胃底折叠术组(分别为 359.6 ± 90.4 分钟和 238.8 ± 75.6 分钟,p<0.0001),平均估计失血量也显著高于再次胃底折叠术组(分别为 168.8 ± 207.5 毫升和 81.0 ± 145.4 毫升,p<0.0001)。从微创手术转为开放手术的转化率在两组之间无显著差异(分别为 10.9%和 11.4%,p=0.92)。RYGB 组(16.8%)和再次胃底折叠术组(12.8%)的复发性反流症状发生率无显著差异(p=0.46),平均随访时间分别为 50.6 ± 140.7 个月和 34.7 ± 39.2 个月(p=0.03)。对于 RYGB 组患者,其他合并症也得到缓解,包括肥胖症(35.6%)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(16.7%)、高脂血症(10.0%)、高血压(9.1%)和糖尿病(9.1%)。平均而言,患者的 BMI 下降了 6.8 ± 5.5kg/m²,多余体重减少了 69.6%。RYGB 组患者的平均住院时间较长(分别为 5.3 ± 7.3 天和 3.0 ± 1.9 天,p=0.01)。两组患者的 30 天再入院率相似(分别为 9.9%和 3.8%,p=0.12)。RYGB 组的再次手术率更高(17.8%比 2.5%,p=0.001)。
RYGB 和再次胃底折叠术在缓解反流方面效果相当。RYGB 可显著减轻多余体重。