• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目的比较结构型和自由型腹腔盆腔 CT 报告中的错误和报告长度。

Objective comparison of errors and report length between structured and freeform abdominopelvic computed tomography reports.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St South, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02646-9. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-020-02646-9
PMID:32676735
Abstract

PURPOSE

To objectively compare structured and freeform abdominopelvic CT reports based on the number and types of errors as well as report length.

METHODS

90 structured and 89 freeform reports from abdominopelvic CT scans with IV contrast obtained for the indication of abdominal pain were randomly selected for review. Each report was reviewed for errors, which were counted and categorized based on the type of error. The total number of words in each report was tallied.

RESULTS

105 total errors were found in the structured reports, compared to 157 total errors in freeform reports. There were 1.16 errors per structured report and 1.76 errors per freeform report (p < 0.001). 48% of structured reports contained at least one error, while 71% of freeform reports contained at least one error (p = 0.002). When a difference existed between the styles with regard to error categories, more errors were observed in freeform reports, with the exception of the duplicated period error where structured reports had more errors. No difference on the basis of average words per report existed, with 219.2 words per report for each reporting style.

CONCLUSION

The use of structured reporting for abdominopelvic CT results in less errors in the report when compared to freeform reporting, potentially reducing clinically significant adverse outcomes in patient care. The report length on the basis of number of words per report is not different between the two reporting styles.

摘要

目的

客观比较基于错误数量和类型以及报告长度的结构化和自由格式腹部盆腔 CT 报告。

方法

随机选择 90 份腹部盆腔 CT 扫描的结构化报告和 89 份自由格式报告进行回顾,这些扫描均为腹痛的指示性检查。每份报告均审查错误,根据错误类型进行计数和分类。总计每个报告中的字数。

结果

在结构化报告中发现 105 个总错误,而在自由格式报告中发现 157 个总错误。结构化报告每报告 1.16 个错误,自由格式报告每报告 1.76 个错误(p<0.001)。48%的结构化报告至少有一个错误,而 71%的自由格式报告至少有一个错误(p=0.002)。如果两种报告风格在错误类别上存在差异,则自由格式报告中观察到更多的错误,除了重复的句号错误,其中结构化报告中存在更多的错误。基于每个报告的平均字数,两种报告风格之间没有差异,每种报告风格的报告字数均为 219.2 个。

结论

与自由格式报告相比,在腹部盆腔 CT 结果中使用结构化报告可减少报告中的错误,从而可能减少患者护理中临床显著的不良后果。基于每个报告的字数,两种报告风格的报告长度没有差异。

相似文献

1
Objective comparison of errors and report length between structured and freeform abdominopelvic computed tomography reports.目的比较结构型和自由型腹腔盆腔 CT 报告中的错误和报告长度。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02646-9. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Revealing the most common reporting errors through data mining of the report proofreading process.通过挖掘报告审核过程中的数据来揭示最常见的报告错误。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2115-2125. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07306-6. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa.住院医生是否应该报告非工作时间的CT扫描结果?南非的错误率计算及影响因素分析。
Acta Radiol. 2012 Feb 1;53(1):61-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110103.
4
Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda.基于报告附加内容的描述,对腹部盆腔 CT 解读中的诊断错误进行分类。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Sep;41(9):1793-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0741-8.
5
Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports.全科室结构化报告的创建与实施:对放射学报告错误率影响的分析
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct;27(5):581-7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9699-7.
6
Frequency and analysis of non-clinical errors made in radiology reports using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System voice recognition dictation software.使用国家综合医学成像系统语音识别听写软件的放射学报告中非临床错误的频率及分析
Ir J Med Sci. 2016 Nov;185(4):921-927. doi: 10.1007/s11845-016-1507-6. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
Quantifying Language Before and After Instituting Structured CT Reports.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1444-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
8
Evaluation of guided reporting: quality and reading time of automatically generated radiology report in breast magnetic resonance imaging using a dedicated software solution.引导式报告评估:使用专用软件解决方案对乳腺磁共振成像中自动生成的放射学报告的质量和阅读时间进行评估。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Jan 1;31(1):19-28. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242702. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
9
Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning.多期 CT 对胰腺癌的结构化报告:对分期和手术规划的潜在影响。
Radiology. 2015 Feb;274(2):464-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140206. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
Structured reporting of CT scans of patients with trauma leads to faster, more detailed diagnoses: An experimental study.创伤患者 CT 扫描的结构化报告可实现更快、更详细的诊断:一项实验研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Nov;144:109954. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109954. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Outsourced Radiology Reports in Emergency Surgical Care: Do They Provide a High-Quality, Cost-Effective Service?急诊外科护理中外包放射学报告的准确性:它们能提供高质量、性价比高的服务吗?
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73152. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73152. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Structured reporting in radiology: a systematic review to explore its potential.放射科的结构化报告:一项探索其潜力的系统评价。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2837-2854. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08327-5. Epub 2021 Oct 15.