• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小麦如何应对稻瘟病菌的感染?一种生理和代谢方法。

How do wheat plants cope with Pyricularia oryzae infection? A physiological and metabolic approach.

机构信息

Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brasil.

Laboratório da Interação Planta-Patógeno, Departamento de Fitopatologia, UFV, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brasil.

出版信息

Planta. 2020 Jul 16;252(2):24. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03428-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00425-020-03428-9
PMID:32676874
Abstract

The infection of wheat leaves by Pyricularia oryzae induced remarkable reprogramming of the primary metabolism (amino acids, sugars, and organic acids) in favor of a successful fungal infection and certain changes were conserved among cultivars regardless of their level of resistance to blast. Wheat blast, caused by Pyricularia oryzae, has become one of the major threats for food security worldwide. Here, we investigated the behavior of three wheat cultivars (BR-18, Embrapa-16, and BRS-Guamirim), differing in their level of resistance to blast, by analyzing changes in cellular damage, antioxidative metabolism, and defense compounds as well as their photosynthetic performance and metabolite profile. Blast severity was lower by 45 and 33% in Embrapa-16 and BR-18 cultivars (moderately resistant), respectively, at 120 h after inoculation in comparison to BRS-Guamirim cultivar (susceptible). Cellular damage caused by P. oryzae infection was great in BRS-Guamirim compared to BR-18. The photosynthetic performance of infected plants was altered due to diffusional and biochemical limitations for CO fixation. At the beginning of the infection process, dramatic changes in both carbohydrate metabolism and on the levels of amino acids, intermediate compounds of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and polyamines were noticed regardless of cultivar suggesting an extensive metabolic reprogramming of the plants following fungal infection. Nevertheless, Embrapa-16 plants displayed a more robust and efficient antioxidant metabolism, higher phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenoloxidase activities and higher concentrations of phenolics and lignin, which, altogether, helped them to counteract more efficiently the infection by P. oryzae. Our results demonstrated that P. oryzae infection significantly modified the metabolism of wheat plants and different types of metabolic defence may act both additively and synergistically to provide additional plant protection to blast.

摘要

稻瘟病菌感染小麦叶片导致初级代谢(氨基酸、糖和有机酸)显著重编程,有利于真菌成功感染,而某些变化在不同品种中是保守的,无论其对穗瘟的抗性水平如何。稻瘟病由稻瘟病菌引起,已成为全球粮食安全的主要威胁之一。在这里,我们通过分析细胞损伤、抗氧化代谢和防御化合物以及光合作用性能和代谢物谱的变化,研究了三个小麦品种(BR-18、Embrapa-16 和 BRS-Guamirim)的行为,它们在对穗瘟的抗性水平上存在差异。与易感品种 BRS-Guamirim 相比,接种后 120 小时,中度抗性品种 Embrapa-16 和 BR-18 的穗瘟严重程度分别降低了 45%和 33%。与 BR-18 相比,稻瘟病菌感染引起的细胞损伤在 BRS-Guamirim 中更为严重。由于 CO2 固定的扩散和生化限制,感染植物的光合作用性能发生了改变。在感染过程的开始阶段,无论品种如何,碳水化合物代谢和氨基酸、三羧酸循环中间化合物和多胺水平都发生了剧烈变化,这表明真菌感染后植物发生了广泛的代谢重编程。然而,Embrapa-16 植物表现出更强壮和有效的抗氧化代谢,更高的苯丙氨酸解氨酶和多酚氧化酶活性,以及更高浓度的酚类和木质素,这一切都有助于它们更有效地对抗稻瘟病菌的感染。我们的研究结果表明,稻瘟病菌感染显著改变了小麦植物的代谢,不同类型的代谢防御可能会起到累加和协同作用,为穗瘟提供额外的植物保护。

相似文献

1
How do wheat plants cope with Pyricularia oryzae infection? A physiological and metabolic approach.小麦如何应对稻瘟病菌的感染?一种生理和代谢方法。
Planta. 2020 Jul 16;252(2):24. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03428-9.
2
Biochemical changes in the leaves of wheat plants infected by Pyricularia oryzae.小麦感染稻瘟病菌后叶片的生化变化。
Phytopathology. 2012 Dec;102(12):1121-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-12-0125-R.
3
Silicon Alleviates Changes in the Source-Sink Relationship of Wheat Plants Infected by .硅缓解 感染小麦源库关系的变化。
Phytopathology. 2019 Jul;109(7):1129-1140. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-18-0428-R. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
Limitations to photosynthesis in leaves of wheat plants infected by Pyricularia oryzae.稻瘟病菌侵染的小麦叶片光合作用的限制。
Phytopathology. 2014 Jan;104(1):34-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-13-0024-R.
5
Picolinic acid spray stimulates the antioxidative metabolism and minimizes impairments on photosynthesis on wheat leaves infected by Pyricularia oryzae.烟酰胺酸喷雾刺激抗氧化代谢,最大程度减少稻瘟病菌感染小麦叶片对光合作用的损害。
Physiol Plant. 2019 Dec;167(4):628-644. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12917. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
Effect of glutamate on Pyricularia oryzae infection of rice monitored by changes in photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant metabolism.谷氨酸对水稻稻瘟病菌感染的影响:通过光合作用参数和抗氧化代谢变化的监测。
Physiol Plant. 2020 Jun;169(2):179-193. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13061. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Alterations in Gas Exchange and Oxidative Metabolism in Rice Leaves Infected by Pyricularia oryzae are Attenuated by Silicon.硅减轻了稻瘟病菌感染的水稻叶片气体交换和氧化代谢的变化。
Phytopathology. 2015 Jun;105(6):738-47. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-10-14-0280-R. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
A New Resistance Gene in Combination with Rmg8 Confers Strong Resistance Against Triticum Isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in a Common Wheat Landrace.一个与 Rmg8 组合的新抗性基因赋予普通小麦地方品种对稻瘟病菌分离物的强抗性。
Phytopathology. 2018 Nov;108(11):1299-1306. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-17-0400-R. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Novel insights into host specificity of Pyricularia oryzae and Pyricularia grisea in the infection of gramineous plant roots.新型宿主特异性洞察:稻瘟病菌和稻曲病菌侵染禾本科植物根系。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1658-1670. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13259. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
The Risk of Wheat Blast in Rice-Wheat Co-Planting Regions in China: MoO Strains of Cause Typical Symptom and Host Reaction on Both Wheat Leaves and Spikes.中国稻麦混种区小麦赤霉病风险:MoO 菌株引起小麦叶片和穗部典型症状和寄主反应。
Phytopathology. 2021 Aug;111(8):1393-1400. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-10-20-0470-R. Epub 2021 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Spermidine treatment limits the development of the fungus in flax shoots by suppressing polyamine metabolism and balanced defence reactions, thus increasing flax resistance to fusariosis.亚精胺处理通过抑制多胺代谢和平衡防御反应来限制真菌在亚麻嫩枝中的生长,从而增强亚麻对镰刀菌病的抗性。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 25;16:1561203. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1561203. eCollection 2025.