University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, USA.
51711Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Child Neurol. 2020 Nov;35(13):873-878. doi: 10.1177/0883073820937515. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Currently, the tracking of seizures is highly subjective, dependent on qualitative information provided by the patient and family instead of quantifiable seizure data. Usage of a seizure detection device to potentially detect seizure events in a population of epilepsy patients has been previously done. Therefore, we chose the Fitbit Charge 2 smart watch to determine if it could detect seizure events in patients when compared to continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring for those admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit. A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the study that met the criteria between 2015 and 2016. All seizure types were recorded. Twelve patients had a total of 53 epileptic seizures. The patient-aggregated receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve of 0.58 [0.56, 0.60], indicating that the neural network models were generally able to detect seizure events at an above-chance level. However, the overall low specificity implied a false alarm rate that would likely make the model unsuitable in practice. Overall, the use of the Fitbit Charge 2 activity tracker does not appear well suited in its current form to detect epileptic seizures in patients with seizure activity when compared to data recorded from the continuous EEG.
目前,癫痫发作的跟踪主要依赖于患者和家属提供的定性信息,而不是可量化的发作数据,具有很大的主观性。已经有使用发作检测设备在癫痫患者人群中检测发作事件的先例。因此,我们选择 Fitbit Charge 2 智能手表,以确定与癫痫监测病房中连续脑电图(EEG)监测相比,它是否可以检测到患者的发作事件。共有 40 名符合标准的患者在 2015 年至 2016 年期间入组了这项研究。记录了所有类型的癫痫发作。12 名患者共发生 53 次癫痫发作。患者汇总的接收器工作特征曲线下面积为 0.58[0.56,0.60],表明神经网络模型通常能够以上限概率检测到发作事件。然而,整体低特异性意味着假警报率可能使该模型在实际应用中不适用。总的来说,与连续 EEG 记录的数据相比,Fitbit Charge 2 活动追踪器目前似乎不太适合用于检测有发作活动的患者的癫痫发作。