Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE, Delft, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE, Delft, the Netherlands; Shaanxi Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Design, Northwestern Polytechnical University, No. 127, Youyi Road (West), Beilin District, Xi'an, 710072, PR China.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103132. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103132. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
This study explores the relationship between seat pitch and comfort, and the influencing factors, like space experience and anthropometric measurements. Two hundred ninety-four participants experienced economy class seats in a Boeing 737 with 28-inch, 30-inch, 32-inch and 34-inch seat pitches. Anthropometric measurements of the participants were measured. Participants completed a questionnaire on comfort (10-scale), discomfort (CP-50) and space experience and the results were analysed using SPSS 25. This study showed a significant relationship between seat pitch and comfort as well as discomfort. Additionally, it was found that the mean rank of discomfort of each pitch size for the middle seat was higher than the window and aisle seat, though seat pitch did affect the (dis)comfort more compared with seat location. It was also found that anthropometric sizes significantly affect the (dis)comfort on smaller pitch sizes, and all space experience questions had a correlation to the pitch sizes.
本研究探讨了座位间距与舒适度的关系,以及空间体验和人体测量学测量等影响因素。294 名参与者在波音 737 飞机的经济舱座位上体验了 28 英寸、30 英寸、32 英寸和 34 英寸的座位间距。测量了参与者的人体测量学测量值。参与者完成了一份关于舒适度(10 分制)、不舒适度(CP-50)和空间体验的问卷,结果使用 SPSS 25 进行了分析。本研究表明,座位间距与舒适度和不舒适度之间存在显著关系。此外,还发现中间座位的每个间距尺寸的不舒适度平均等级高于靠窗和靠过道的座位,尽管与座位位置相比,座位间距确实对(不)舒适度的影响更大。还发现,人体测量尺寸对较小的间距尺寸的(不)舒适度有显著影响,并且所有空间体验问题都与间距尺寸相关。