School of Art and Design, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
School of Emergency Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0276900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276900. eCollection 2023.
In this paper, eight different contoured cushions (S1-S8) in two categories (flat and wrapped) were designed to study the influence of different contoured cushions on passenger comfort in high-speed trains. Meanwhile, subjective data investigation by the comfort Likert Scale questionnaire and objective physical variables collection by the body-cushion contact pressure test was carried out. In addition, one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis were performed on the subjective survey and objective test data. The results show that the cushion contours had a significant effect on the subjective evaluation of the overall comfort of the participants, in which the overall comfort below the waist of the separated wrapped cushion S8 has the highest subjective comfort score. The overall comfort of the flat-front bulge type cushion S4 and the local comfort of the thighs and the root of the thighs were rated higher than other flat types. Under the flat cushion, the effect of stature characteristics (mainly weight and hip-width) on the overall comfort subjective ratings was insignificant, and the effect on the contact pressure distribution variables was significant, but the contact pressure distribution variables were not correlated with the comfort ratings. Under the wrapped cushion, the effect of stature characteristics on the overall comfort subjective ratings and contact pressure distribution variables was significant. There were positive and negative correlations between the average peak contact pressure and average contact pressure and comfort ratings, respectively.
本文设计了 8 种不同轮廓的坐垫(S1-S8),分为两类(平垫和围垫),旨在研究不同轮廓的坐垫对高速列车乘客舒适度的影响。同时,通过舒适度李克特量表问卷进行主观数据调查,并通过人体-坐垫接触压力测试收集客观物理变量。此外,对主观调查和客观测试数据进行了单因素方差分析和 Pearson 相关分析。结果表明,坐垫轮廓对参与者整体舒适度的主观评价有显著影响,其中分离式围垫 S8 腰部以下的整体舒适度具有最高的主观舒适度评分。平前凸起型坐垫 S4 的整体舒适度和大腿及大腿根部的局部舒适度评分较高,其他平垫类型的评分较低。在平垫下,身高特征(主要是体重和臀宽)对整体舒适度主观评分的影响不显著,对接触压力分布变量的影响显著,但接触压力分布变量与舒适度评分不相关。在围垫下,身高特征对整体舒适度主观评分和接触压力分布变量的影响显著。平均峰值接触压力和平均接触压力与舒适度评分分别呈正相关和负相关。