• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合 MRI 靶向活检与系统确认性活检可提高前列腺癌主动监测患者的风险分层。

Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Urology. 2020 Oct;144:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.061. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.061
PMID:32679272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8916164/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of combined MRI-targeted plus systematic 12-core biopsy (Cbx) to aid in the selection of patients for active surveillance (AS).

METHODS

From July 2007 to January 2020, patients with Gleason Grade Group (GG) 1 or GG 2 prostate cancer were referred to our center for AS consideration. All patients underwent an MRI and confirmatory combined MRI-targeted plus systematic biopsy (Cbx), and AS outcomes based on Cbx results were compared. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of AS failure, defined as progression to ≥ GG3 disease on follow-up biopsies.

RESULTS

Of 579 patients referred for AS, 79.3% (459/579) and 20.7% (120/579) had an initial diagnosis of GG1 and GG2 disease, respectively. Overall, 43.2% of patients (250/579) were upgraded on confirmatory Cbx, with 19.2% (111/579) upgraded to ≥ GG3. For the 226 patients followed on AS, 32.7% (74/226) had benign, 45.6% (103/226) had GG1, and 21.7% (49/226) had GG2 results on confirmatory Cbx. In total, 28.8% (65/226) of patients eventually progressed to ≥ GG3, with a median time to AS failure of 89 months. The median time from confirmatory Cbx to AS failure for the negative, GG1, and GG2 groups were 97, 97, and 32 months, respectively (p < .001). On multivariable regression, only age (hazard ratio 1.06 [1.02-1.11], p < .005) and GG on confirmatory Cbx (hazard ratio 2.75 [1.78-4.26], p < .005) remained as positive predictors of AS failure.

CONCLUSION

The confirmatory combined MRI-targeted plus systematic biopsy provides useful information for the risk stratification of patients at the time of AS enrollment.

摘要

目的

评估 MRI 靶向联合系统 12 针活检(Cbx)在辅助选择主动监测(AS)患者中的疗效。

方法

2007 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月,我们中心对 Gleason 分级组(GG)1 或 GG 2 前列腺癌患者进行了转诊,以考虑 AS。所有患者均行 MRI 检查和确认性 MRI 靶向联合系统活检(Cbx),并比较基于 Cbx 结果的 AS 结果。Cox 回归用于识别 AS 失败的预测因素,AS 失败定义为随访活检进展为≥GG3 疾病。

结果

在 579 例转诊接受 AS 的患者中,79.3%(459/579)和 20.7%(120/579)患者的初始诊断分别为 GG1 和 GG2 疾病。总体而言,43.2%(250/579)的患者在确认性 Cbx 中升级,其中 19.2%(111/579)升级至≥GG3。在 226 例接受 AS 随访的患者中,74 例(74/226)的活检结果为良性,45.6%(103/226)为 GG1,21.7%(49/226)为 GG2。总的来说,28.8%(65/226)的患者最终进展为≥GG3,AS 失败的中位时间为 89 个月。阴性、GG1 和 GG2 组从确认性 Cbx 到 AS 失败的中位时间分别为 97、97 和 32 个月(p<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,只有年龄(危险比 1.06[1.02-1.11],p<0.005)和确认性 Cbx 的 GG(危险比 2.75[1.78-4.26],p<0.005)是 AS 失败的阳性预测因素。

结论

确认性联合 MRI 靶向联合系统活检为 AS 入组时患者的风险分层提供了有用的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa9/8916164/f07eb3c0cbb6/nihms-1781944-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa9/8916164/f07eb3c0cbb6/nihms-1781944-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa9/8916164/f07eb3c0cbb6/nihms-1781944-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.联合 MRI 靶向活检与系统确认性活检可提高前列腺癌主动监测患者的风险分层。
Urology. 2020 Oct;144:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.061. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.双侧病变经 MRI-融合引导下系统穿刺活检的主动监测患者中前列腺癌进展的风险。
J Urol. 2021 Nov;206(5):1157-1165. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001941. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.磁共振成像引导下的前列腺癌主动监测确认性活检。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11019.
4
Is Confirmatory Biopsy Still Necessary for Active Surveillance of Men With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric MRI?在多参数磁共振成像时代,对于1级前列腺癌男性患者进行主动监测时,确认性活检是否仍然必要?
J Urol. 2025 Jan;213(1):20-26. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004268. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
5
Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial.主动监测磁共振成像研究(ASIST):一项随机多中心前瞻性试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):300-309. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Comparing confirmatory biopsy outcomes between MRI-targeted biopsy and standard systematic biopsy among men being enrolled in prostate cancer active surveillance.比较在前列腺癌主动监测中入组的男性中,MRI 靶向活检与标准系统活检的确认性活检结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Mar;127(3):340-348. doi: 10.1111/bju.15100. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Randomized Study of Systematic Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted and Systematic Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance (ASIST): 2-year Postbiopsy Follow-up.主动监测(ASIST)中男性系统活检与磁共振成像及靶向和系统活检的随机研究:活检后 2 年随访。
Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
8
Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.3特斯拉多参数磁共振成像及靶向活检在考虑进行主动监测的患者中改善风险分层的价值
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):535-542. doi: 10.1111/bju.13624. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
9
PI-RADS® Category as a Predictor of Progression to Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.PI-RADS® 分类作为主动监测男性向不利风险前列腺癌进展的预测指标。
J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1229-1235. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001307. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?基线多参数磁共振成像上可见的 1 级前列腺癌是否会影响临床结局?
J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1187-1194. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001157. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The presence of prostate MRI-visible lesions at follow-up biopsy as a risk factor for histopathological upgrading during active surveillance.随访活检时前列腺MRI可见病变作为主动监测期间组织病理学升级的危险因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04871-6.
2
Reliability of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies versus Prostatectomy.系统活检和靶向活检与前列腺切除术的可靠性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 6;10(12):1395. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121395.
3
Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向、系统和联合活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
2
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗生素预防前列腺活检后感染性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2020 Aug;204(2):224-230. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000814. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
The long-term outcomes of Gleason grade groups 2 and 3 prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: Results from a large, population-based cohort.
22特征基因组分类器与前列腺癌主动监测期间活检Gleason分级升级之间的关联
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Feb 11;37:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.双侧病变经 MRI-融合引导下系统穿刺活检的主动监测患者中前列腺癌进展的风险。
J Urol. 2021 Nov;206(5):1157-1165. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001941. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
主动监测管理的Gleason分级组2和3前列腺癌的长期结局:来自一项基于人群的大型队列研究的结果
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jun;14(6):174-181. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6328.
4
Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.1 级前列腺癌的主动监测:来自大型前瞻性队列的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):675-682. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center.三级癌症中心采用主动监测管理的 2 级前列腺癌男性的转移风险。
J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1117-1121. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000742. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience.主动监测前列腺癌的长期结果:纪念斯隆·凯特琳癌症中心的经验。
J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1122-1127. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000713. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received.根据接受的治疗,来自ProtecT随机对照试验的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的十年死亡率、疾病进展及治疗相关副作用
Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-330. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
8
Randomized Study of Systematic Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted and Systematic Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance (ASIST): 2-year Postbiopsy Follow-up.主动监测(ASIST)中男性系统活检与磁共振成像及靶向和系统活检的随机研究:活检后 2 年随访。
Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.北美主动监测队列中不同活检频率下的前列腺癌死亡率和转移率。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):583-592. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32557. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.磁共振成像引导下的前列腺癌主动监测确认性活检。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11019.