Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Division of Aquaculture, Upgrading and Bioprospection, Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, I.P. (IPMA, I.P.), Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho 6, 1495-006, Lisbon, Portugal.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Oct;144:111573. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111573. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The importance of seafood for a healthy diet is widely recognized but concerns are raised over the risks associated with contaminants, causing a communication dilemma concerning this nutritional-toxicological conflict. Although health benefits outweigh the risks for the general population, caution is needed for vulnerable groups. Increased use of the internet for health and nutrition information grants new opportunities for online tools with tailored information. The interactive FishChoice tool, developed within EU-funded ECsafeSEAFOOD project, informs consumers on the health benefits and risks linked to their seafood consumption pattern. This study assesses the acceptance of the FishChoice tool through an online survey in five European countries, namely Belgium, Norway, Spain, Portugal and Ireland (n = 703). About two thirds of consumers agreed they would use the provided information when choosing seafood species, portion size or frequency of consumption. Heavy users of seafood had a higher intention to reuse the tool. This study provides preliminary evidence that for risk-benefit communication about seafood, online tailored tools such as FishChoice are evaluated as user-friendly and useful. Similar tools can be used in situations where no general recommendations can be made. Further research should determine the long term impact of these communication messages and tools on consumers' behavior.
海鲜对健康饮食的重要性已被广泛认可,但人们对与污染物相关的风险感到担忧,这就产生了关于这种营养-毒理学冲突的沟通难题。尽管健康益处超过了一般人群的风险,但弱势群体需要谨慎。互联网在健康和营养信息方面的使用增加为具有针对性信息的在线工具提供了新的机会。在欧盟资助的 ECsafeSEAFOOD 项目中开发的互动式 FishChoice 工具,为消费者提供了与其海鲜消费模式相关的健康益处和风险的信息。本研究通过在五个欧洲国家(比利时、挪威、西班牙、葡萄牙和爱尔兰)进行的在线调查,评估了 FishChoice 工具的接受程度(n=703)。大约三分之二的消费者表示,他们在选择海鲜品种、份量或食用频率时会使用提供的信息。海鲜的重度使用者更倾向于重复使用该工具。这项研究初步表明,对于海鲜的风险-效益沟通,在线定制工具(如 FishChoice)被评估为用户友好且有用。在无法制定一般建议的情况下,可以使用类似的工具。进一步的研究应确定这些沟通信息和工具对消费者行为的长期影响。