More Simon John, Benford Diane, Hougaard Bennekou Susanne, Bampidis Vasileios, Bragard Claude, Halldorsson Thorhallur Ingi, Hernández-Jerez Antonio F, Koutsoumanis Kostas, Lambré Claude, Machera Kyriaki, Mullins Ewen, Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Schlatter Josef, Schrenk Dieter, Turck Dominique, Naska Androniki, Poulsen Morten, Ranta Jukka, Sand Salomon, Wallace Heather, Bastaki Maria, Liem Djien, Smith Anthony, Ververis Ermolaos, Zamariola Giorgia, Younes Maged
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 16;22(7):e8875. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8875. eCollection 2024 Jul.
The EFSA Scientific Committee has updated its 2010 Guidance on risk-benefit assessment (RBA) of foods. The update addresses methodological developments and regulatory needs. While it retains the stepwise RBA approach, it provides additional methods for complex assessments, such as multiple chemical hazards and all relevant health effects impacting different population subgroups. The updated guidance includes approaches for systematic identification, prioritisation and selection of hazardous and beneficial food components. It also offers updates relevant to characterising adverse and beneficial effects, such as measures of effect size and dose-response modelling. The guidance expands options for characterising risks and benefits, incorporating variability, uncertainty, severity categorisation and ranking of different (beneficial or adverse) effects. The impact of different types of health effects is assessed qualitatively or quantitatively, depending on the problem formulation, scope of the RBA question and data availability. The integration of risks and benefits often involves value-based judgements and should ideally be performed with the risk-benefit manager. Metrics such as Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) can be used. Additional approaches are presented, such as probability of all relevant effects and/or effects of given severities and their integration using severity weight functions. The update includes practical guidance on reporting results, interpreting outcomes and communicating the outcome of an RBA, considering consumer perspectives and responses to advice.
欧洲食品安全局科学委员会更新了其2010年关于食品风险效益评估(RBA)的指南。此次更新涉及方法学的发展和监管需求。虽然它保留了逐步进行风险效益评估的方法,但为复杂评估提供了额外的方法,例如多种化学危害以及影响不同人群亚组的所有相关健康影响。更新后的指南包括对有害和有益食品成分进行系统识别、优先级排序和选择的方法。它还提供了与表征有害和有益影响相关的更新内容,例如效应大小的测量和剂量反应建模。该指南扩展了表征风险和效益的选项,纳入了变异性、不确定性、严重程度分类以及不同(有益或有害)影响的排名。根据问题的提出、风险效益评估问题的范围和数据可用性,对不同类型健康影响的影响进行定性或定量评估。风险和效益的整合通常涉及基于价值的判断,理想情况下应由风险效益管理人员进行。可以使用残疾调整生命年(DALYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)等指标。还介绍了其他方法,例如所有相关影响的概率和/或给定严重程度的影响以及使用严重程度权重函数对其进行整合。此次更新包括关于报告结果、解释结果以及传达风险效益评估结果的实用指南,同时考虑了消费者的观点和对建议的反应。