Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂在新生儿和婴儿中的应用。缺乏共识 - ASPO 调查。

Proton pump inhibitor administration in neonates and infants. Lack of consensus - An ASPO survey.

机构信息

NYU Langone Health, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NY, NY, USA.

NYU Langone Health, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NY, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110200. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laryngopharyngeal and Gastroesophageal reflux (LPR and GER) are distinct clinical entities that present with a range of non-specific symptoms. The exact prevalence in the pediatric population is unknown. While there has been an increase in the use of PPIs, lack of clear guidelines, conflicting evidence regarding efficacy and safety concerns with long-term use require physicians to use their own anecdotal experience and clinical judgement when treating patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate practice patterns among pediatric otolaryngologists regarding the use of proton-pump inhibitors for reflux-related conditions.

METHODS

A survey was submitted to American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) members to determine practice patterns regarding use of PPIs for reflux-related conditions in the newborn and infant population. Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test was performed.

RESULTS

37% of respondents would not prescribe PO PPIs in neonates, with 50% not prescribing IV PPIs. 60% would prescribe a PPI as second or third-line treatment for infants (10 weeks to 1-year). Only 10% would prescribe as first-line in this age group. 48% would prescribe PPIs once daily and 19% as BID. No significant practice differences exist based on years of experience, number of relevant patients seen, and setting of practice.

CONCLUSION

There was no agreement regarding dosage, frequency and duration of PPI treatment for reflux disease in neonates and infants. There was also no correlation with experience or practice setting. This emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to guide management of GER and LPR in this population.

摘要

目的

喉咽反流(LPR)和胃食管反流(GER)是两种不同的临床实体,它们表现出一系列非特异性症状。在儿科人群中的确切患病率尚不清楚。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的使用有所增加,但缺乏明确的指南,关于长期使用的疗效和安全性的证据相互矛盾,这要求医生在治疗患者时使用自己的经验和临床判断。本研究的目的是评估儿科耳鼻喉科医生在使用质子泵抑制剂治疗与反流相关疾病的实践模式。

方法

向美国小儿耳鼻喉科学会(ASPO)成员提交了一项调查,以确定他们在新生儿和婴儿人群中使用质子泵抑制剂治疗与反流相关疾病的实践模式。使用 Fisher 精确检验进行了统计分析。

结果

37%的受访者不会为新生儿开口服 PPI,50%的受访者不会开静脉 PPI。60%的人会将 PPI 作为婴儿(10 周至 1 岁)的二线或三线治疗药物。只有 10%的人会在这个年龄段作为一线药物。48%的人会开每日一次的 PPI,19%的人会开每日两次。根据经验年限、就诊相关患者数量和实践环境,不存在显著的实践差异。

结论

对于新生儿和婴儿的反流性疾病,PPI 的剂量、频率和治疗持续时间没有达成共识。经验或实践环境也没有相关性。这强调了需要多学科方法和共识声明来指导这一人群中 GER 和 LPR 的管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验