• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践中的创新:一项针对患有多种复杂精神障碍的“难以接触到”的年轻人的病例对照和随访研究。

Innovations in Practice: A case control and follow-up study of 'hard to reach' young people who suffered from multiple complex mental disorders.

作者信息

Camilleri Nigel, Newbury-Birch Dorothy, McArdle Paul, Stocken Deborah D, Thick Tony, Le Couteur Ann

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddilley-Clarke Building, Richardson Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.

Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, County Durham DL2 2TS, UK.

出版信息

Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017 Feb;22(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/camh.12202. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1111/camh.12202
PMID:32680404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Innovations Project (IP) was a new multidisciplinary team based within an inner city, walk-in health centre, North East England (throughout 2011). The aim was to describe the social and mental disorders of the hard to reach young people (HTRYP) from the IP and compare with a matched sample who attended a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and follow-up both samples 24 months after discharge.

METHODS

A retrospective review of clinical case notes of YP who attended the IP and CMHT. A 24-month (postdischarge) follow-up evaluation of the mental state and social function of the YP in both groups using Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (HoNOSCA) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).

RESULTS

Thirty-six referrals were accepted over a one-year period by the IP, 31 met criteria for the HTRYP, 15 were offered individually tailored therapy. The HTRYP who were more deprived compared to the CMHT matched sample (n = 115), experienced a higher median number of mental disorders (n = 3 compared to CMHT n = 1), higher severity scores and lower levels of social function (HTRYP HoNOSCA mean: 19.1 (95% CI 15.9-22.2) and CMHT mean: 11.2 (95% CI 2.0-23.0) p = <.001, and HTRYP CGAS mean: 51.0 (95% CI 46.0-56.2) and CMHT mean: 58.9 (95% CI 52.9-64.8), p = .05). The HTRYP made significantly greater improvement compared to CMHTYP; (HoNOSCA p = <.001 and CGAS p = <.002) at discharge. A total of 13 HTRYP and 9 CMHT YP attended the follow-up review at 24 months. There was substantial variability in terms of social function between the YP within each sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The term 'HTR' describes a state that may be often temporary, as opposed to lifelong. A bespoke service offering a developmental theoretical framework, regular reviews and an individualised care plan, was able to engage and had the potential to reduce morbidity suffered by HTRYP.

摘要

背景

创新项目(IP)是2011年全年设在英格兰东北部市中心一家无需预约的健康中心内的一个新的多学科团队。其目的是描述来自该创新项目的难以接触到的年轻人(HTRYP)的社会和精神障碍,并与参加社区心理健康团队(CMHT)的匹配样本进行比较,并在出院24个月后对两个样本进行随访。

方法

对参加创新项目和社区心理健康团队的年轻人的临床病例记录进行回顾性审查。使用儿童和青少年心理健康国家健康结果量表(HoNOSCA)和儿童总体评估量表(CGAS)对两组年轻人出院后24个月的精神状态和社会功能进行随访评估。

结果

创新项目在一年期间接受了36例转诊,31例符合难以接触到的年轻人的标准,15例接受了个性化治疗。与社区心理健康团队的匹配样本(n = 115)相比,处境更不利的难以接触到的年轻人精神障碍的中位数更高(难以接触到的年轻人为n = 3,而社区心理健康团队为n = 1),严重程度得分更高,社会功能水平更低(难以接触到的年轻人HoNOSCA平均值:19.1(95%可信区间15.9 - 22.2),社区心理健康团队平均值:11.2(95%可信区间2.0 - 23.0),p = <.001;难以接触到的年轻人CGAS平均值:51.0(95%可信区间46.0 - 56.2),社区心理健康团队平均值:58.9(95%可信区间52.9 - 64.8),p = .05)。与社区心理健康团队的年轻人相比,难以接触到的年轻人在出院时改善更为显著(HoNOSCA p = <.001,CGAS p = <.002)。共有13名难以接触到的年轻人和9名社区心理健康团队的年轻人参加了24个月后的随访复查。每个样本中的年轻人在社会功能方面存在很大差异。

结论

“难以接触到”一词描述的是一种可能经常是暂时的状态,而非终身状态。一项提供发展理论框架、定期复查和个性化护理计划的定制服务能够让难以接触到的年轻人参与进来,并有可能降低他们所遭受的发病率。

相似文献

1
Innovations in Practice: A case control and follow-up study of 'hard to reach' young people who suffered from multiple complex mental disorders.实践中的创新:一项针对患有多种复杂精神障碍的“难以接触到”的年轻人的病例对照和随访研究。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017 Feb;22(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/camh.12202. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
2
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.为患有严重精神疾病和人格障碍者设立的社区心理健康团队。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD000270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000270.pub2.
3
Evaluating a mental health assessment for older people with depressive symptoms in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.在全科医疗中评估针对有抑郁症状老年人的心理健康评估:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Mar;52(476):202-7.
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
6
Comparison of referrals from primary and secondary care to CMHT psychologists.
Ir J Psychol Med. 2009 Jun;26(2):73-75. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700000276.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Young Australians with moderate to severe mental health problems: client data and outcomes at Children and Young People's Mental Health.患有中度至重度心理健康问题的澳大利亚年轻人:儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构的客户数据及结果
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;11(4):334-341. doi: 10.1111/eip.12252. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
IQ as a predictor of clinician-rated mental health problems in children and adolescents.智商作为儿童和青少年临床医生评定的心理健康问题的预测指标。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jun;51(2):185-96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02023.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive Outreach for Mental Health: Young People's Experiences of an Intensive Outreach Model on Recovery and Engagement.心理健康强化外展服务:年轻人对强化外展模式在康复与参与方面的体验
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01387-z. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Predictors and moderators of outcome of psychotherapeutic interventions for mental disorders in adolescents and young adults: protocol for systematic reviews.预测因素和调节因素对青少年和年轻成年人精神障碍心理治疗干预效果的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 30;10(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01788-1.