• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛对降低急性冠状动脉综合征患者革兰阳性感染风险的影响。

Effect of Ticagrelor on Reducing the Risk of Gram-Positive Infections in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

机构信息

Internal Medicine "T", Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Internal Medicine "T", Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.016
PMID:32680674
Abstract

In light of recent studies describing the antibacterial properties of ticagrelor, the association between treatment with ticagrelor and subsequent risk for infection following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is taking on increased importance. A single center, retrospective, matched cohort analysis was performed. All patients older than 30 years of age admitted between January 1, 2013 and November 1, 2019 for an ACS and discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were included. The primary outcome was defined as hospital admissions due to infections likely caused by gram-positive bacteria up to 1 year following the ACS hospitalization. The base cohort included 3,909 patients. About 2,035 (52.1%) were treated with ticagrelor and 1,874 (47.9%) with clopidogrel. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a 64% lower risk of gram-positive infection during the first year following hospitalization after adjusting for demographic and co-morbidity factors compared with those treated with clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.61; p <0.001). In a cohort starting from 1 year (conclusion of DAPT period) and up to 3 years following ACS hospitalization, the risk of gram-positive infection was comparable in both groups (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.19; p = 0.182). Treatment with ticagrelor was not associated with a reduced risk of gram-negative infections (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.06; p = 0.07). In conclusion, DAPT regimen that includes aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with reduced risk of gram-positive infection compared with the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel.

摘要

鉴于最近的研究描述了替格瑞洛的抗菌特性,替格瑞洛治疗与急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后感染风险之间的关联变得越来越重要。进行了一项单中心、回顾性、匹配队列分析。纳入 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 11 月 1 日期间因 ACS 入院并接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)出院的年龄大于 30 岁的所有患者。主要结局定义为 ACS 住院后 1 年内因可能由革兰阳性菌引起的感染而住院。基础队列包括 3909 例患者。约 2035 例(52.1%)接受替格瑞洛治疗,1874 例(47.9%)接受氯吡格雷治疗。在校正人口统计学和合并症因素后,与接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者相比,接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者在 ACS 住院后第一年发生革兰阳性感染的风险降低 64%(风险比 [HR],0.36;95%置信区间 [CI],0.21 至 0.61;p<0.001)。在从 ACS 住院后 1 年(DAPT 结束)开始至 3 年的队列中,两组的革兰阳性感染风险相当(HR,0.70;95%CI,0.41 至 1.19;p=0.182)。替格瑞洛治疗与革兰阴性感染风险降低无关(HR,0.48;95%CI,0.21 至 1.06;p=0.07)。总之,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合治疗相比,包含阿司匹林和替格瑞洛的 DAPT 方案与革兰阳性感染风险降低相关。

相似文献

1
Effect of Ticagrelor on Reducing the Risk of Gram-Positive Infections in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.替格瑞洛对降低急性冠状动脉综合征患者革兰阳性感染风险的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Serum uric acid levels during dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel: Results from a single-centre study.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗期间的血清尿酸水平:一项单中心研究的结果
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;26(7):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Secondary prevention of acute coronary events with antiplatelet agents (SPACE-AA): One-year real-world effectiveness and safety cohort study in the French nationwide claims database.抗血小板药物二级预防急性冠脉事件(SPACE-AA):法国全国索赔数据库中的一年真实世界有效性和安全性队列研究。
Atherosclerosis. 2019 Feb;281:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.11.037. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
Clopidogrel or ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: CHANGE DAPT.在接受新一代药物洗脱支架治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛:CHANGE DAPT。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Nov 20;13(10):1168-1176. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00634.
5
Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design.替卡格雷单药治疗在新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后的随机评估:TICO 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Ticagrelor in patients with heart failure after acute coronary syndromes-Insights from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛在急性冠状动脉综合征后心力衰竭患者中的应用——来自血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验的见解。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
7
Effect of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Hyperuricemia.替格瑞洛对比氯吡格雷对伴有高尿酸血症的急性冠状动脉综合征患者全因和心血管死亡率的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Mar;44(3):163-174. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01342-6. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Vitamin D levels and platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.糖尿病患者接受双联抗血小板治疗时的维生素 D 水平和血小板反应性。
Vascul Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;120:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2019.106564. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
Comparative effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet drugs in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome.抗血小板药物在糖尿病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效及安全性比较
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1361-1370. doi: 10.1002/pds.4668. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor in comparison to clopidogrel: a retrospective pharmacodynamic analysis.比较普拉格雷或替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的血小板反应性:一项回顾性药效学分析。
Platelets. 2019;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1445836. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Adding P2Y12 Inhibitor to Anti-staphylococcal Therapy on Bacterial Clearance in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.在抗金黄色葡萄球菌治疗中添加P2Y12抑制剂对金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者细菌清除的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e71984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71984. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Impact of P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes in sepsis-3 patients receiving aspirin: a propensity score matched analysis.在接受阿司匹林治疗的脓毒症-3 患者中,P2Y12 抑制剂对临床结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09421-x.
3
Protective Effect of Ticagrelor Against Infective Endocarditis Induced by Virulent in Mice.
替格瑞洛对小鼠强毒株诱导的感染性心内膜炎的保护作用。
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 May 24;8(11):1439-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Endothelial ADAM10 utilization defines a molecular pathway of vascular injury in mice with bacterial sepsis.内皮细胞 ADAM10 的利用定义了小鼠脓毒症血管损伤的分子途径。
J Clin Invest. 2023 Dec 1;133(23):e168450. doi: 10.1172/JCI168450.
5
The Role of Platelets in Infective Endocarditis.血小板在感染性心内膜炎中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 19;24(8):7540. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087540.
6
Non-Antimicrobial Adjuvant Therapy Using Ticagrelor Reduced Biofilm-Related Prosthetic Joint Infection.使用替格瑞洛的非抗菌辅助治疗可减少生物膜相关的人工关节感染。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 1;13:927783. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.927783. eCollection 2022.
7
Antiplatelet Therapy in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: No Time Like the Past?金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的抗血小板治疗:过去的时光并非一无是处?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jun 21;66(6):e0036522. doi: 10.1128/aac.00365-22. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Antiplatelet therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Will it stick?金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的抗血小板治疗:它会有效吗?
PLoS Pathog. 2022 Feb 10;18(2):e1010240. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010240. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Aspirin or Ticagrelor in Infective Endocarditis: Where Do We Stand?阿司匹林或替格瑞洛用于感染性心内膜炎:我们目前的情况如何?
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Oct 7;9:716302. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.716302. eCollection 2021.