Suppr超能文献

收入和教育水平与北美的生育力前瞻性队列研究中的生育力相关。

Association of income and education with fecundability in a North American preconception cohort.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;50:41-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate socioeconomic determinants of fecundability.

METHODS

Among 8654 female pregnancy planners from Pregnancy Study Online, a North American prospective cohort study (2013-2019), we examined associations between socioeconomic status and fecundability (the per-cycle probability of conception). Information on income and education was collected via baseline questionnaires. Bimonthly follow-up questionnaires were used to ascertain pregnancy status. We estimated fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using proportional probabilities regression, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Relative to an annual household income of greater than or equal to $150,000, adjusted FRs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-1.01) for less than $50,000, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.92-1.07) for $50,000-$99,000, and 1.09 (95% CI: 1.01-1.18) for $100,000-$149,000. FRs for less than 12, 13-15, and 16 years of education, relative to greater than or equal to 17 years, were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.76-1.08), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95), respectively. Slightly stronger associations for income and education were seen among older women.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower levels of education and income were associated with modestly reduced fecundability. These results demonstrate the presence of socioeconomic disparities in fecundability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估生育力的社会经济决定因素。

方法

在北美前瞻性队列研究(2013-2019 年)——妊娠在线研究中,我们纳入了 8654 名妊娠计划女性,研究了社会经济地位与生育力(每个周期的受孕概率)之间的关系。通过基线问卷收集了收入和教育信息。双月随访问卷用于确定妊娠状态。我们使用比例概率回归控制潜在混杂因素后,估计了生育力比值(FRs)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

与年收入大于或等于 150000 美元相比,调整后的 FRs 分别为:年收入少于 50000 美元为 0.91(95%CI:0.83-1.01),年收入 50000-99000 美元为 0.99(95%CI:0.92-1.07),年收入 100000-149000 美元为 1.09(95%CI:1.01-1.18)。与接受教育年限大于或等于 17 年相比,接受教育年限少于 12 年、13-15 年和 16 年的 FRs 分别为 0.90(95%CI:0.76-1.08)、0.84(95%CI:0.78-0.91)和 0.89(95%CI:0.84-0.95)。在年龄较大的女性中,收入和教育与生育力的关联稍强。

结论

较低的教育水平和收入与生育力略有下降相关。这些结果表明生育力存在社会经济差异。

相似文献

1
Association of income and education with fecundability in a North American preconception cohort.
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;50:41-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Socioeconomic status and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort.
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead077.
4
Fecundability in relation to use of fertility awareness indicators in a North American preconception cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2019 Nov;112(5):892-899. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.036.
5
Menstrual cycle characteristics and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort.
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):482-487.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 31.
6
Female sleep patterns, shift work, and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2019 Jun;111(6):1201-1210.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Body mass index, physical activity and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Air pollution and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.
Environ Int. 2023 Nov;181:108249. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108249. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
10
Antibiotics and fecundability among female pregnancy planners: a prospective cohort study.
Hum Reprod. 2021 Sep 18;36(10):2761-2768. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab173.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of discrimination across the life course among pregnancy planners in the United States and Canada.
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 11;30:101803. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101803. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Female sexual function and distress and time-to-pregnancy in a prospective preconception cohort.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):375.e1-375.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.117. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Development and Mental Health in a North American Preconception Cohort Study: 2013-2023.
Am J Public Health. 2024 Sep;114(9):923-934. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307730. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Association between job control and time to pregnancy in a preconception cohort.
Fertil Steril. 2024 Mar;121(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.11.022. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Socioeconomic status and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort.
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead077.
7
Dietary Supplement Intake and Fecundability in a Singapore Preconception Cohort Study.
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 1;14(23):5110. doi: 10.3390/nu14235110.
8
Association Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Fertility Among Pregnancy Planners in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2218738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18738.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Behavior with Increasing Pregnancy Attempt Time: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Epidemiology. 2020 Sep;31(5):659-667. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001220.
2
"Research on Infertility: Definition Makes a Difference" Revisited.
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;187(2):337-346. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx240.
3
Transitions in pregnancy planning in women recruited for a large prospective cohort study.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1325-1333. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex065.
4
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
5
Are Pregnancy Intentions Associated with Transitions Into and Out of Marriage?
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Mar;48(1):35-43. doi: 10.1363/48e8116. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
6
Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):91-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000409.
7
Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Internet-based Study of Pregnancy Planners.
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):98-104. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000400.
8
Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1139. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
Design and Conduct of an Internet-Based Preconception Cohort Study in North America: Pregnancy Study Online.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;29(4):360-71. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12201.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验