Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Verwelius 3D Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;50(3):287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
In mandibular surgery, three-dimensionally printed patient-specific cutting guides are used to translate the preoperative virtually planned resection planes to the operating room. This study was performed to determine whether cutting guides are positioned according to the virtual plan and to compare the intraoperative position of the cutting guide with the resection performed. Nine patients were included. The exact positions of the resection planes were planned virtually and a patient-specific cutting guide was designed and printed. After surgical placement of the cutting guide, intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed. Postoperative CT was used to obtain the final resection planes. Distances and yaw and pitch angles between the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative resection planes were calculated. Cutting guides were positioned on the mandible with millimetre accuracy. Anterior osteotomies were performed more accurately than posterior osteotomies (intraoperatively positioned and final resection planes differed by 1.2±1.0mm, 4.9±6.6°, and 1.8±1.5°, respectively, and by 2.2±0.9mm, 9.3±9°, and 8.3±6.5° respectively). Differences between intraoperatively planned and final resection planes imply a directional freedom of the saw through the saw slots. Since cutting guides are positioned with millimetre accuracy compared to the virtual plan, the design of the saw slots in the cutting guides needs improvement to allow more accurate resections.
在下颌骨手术中,使用三维打印的患者特异性切割导板将术前虚拟规划的切除平面转换到手术室。本研究旨在确定切割导板是否按照虚拟计划定位,并比较切割导板的术中位置与实际切除情况。纳入了 9 名患者。在虚拟规划中精确地设计了切除平面的位置,并设计和打印了患者特异性的切割导板。在手术放置切割导板后,进行术中锥形束 CT(CBCT)检查。术后 CT 用于获得最终的切除平面。计算了术前、术中、术后切除平面之间的距离和偏航角及俯仰角。切割导板在颌骨上的定位精度可达毫米。前骨切开术比后骨切开术更准确(术中定位与最终切除平面之间的差异分别为 1.2±1.0mm、4.9±6.6°和 1.8±1.5°,以及 2.2±0.9mm、9.3±9°和 8.3±6.5°)。术中规划和最终切除平面之间的差异意味着锯片通过锯槽的方向自由度。由于与虚拟计划相比,切割导板的定位精度可达毫米,因此需要改进切割导板中锯槽的设计,以实现更精确的切除。